How the Perceived Masculinity and/or Femininity of Software Applications Influences Students' Software Preferences

Increasingly, technology skills are becoming central to academic and economic success. More and more technological tools are becoming a vehicle for teaching and learning and a vehicle for buying and selling goods. However, research continues to show that women lag behind men in PC-ownership regardless of social economic status (SES) or education level (Lenhart, 2003; McConnaughey & Lader, 1998); girls take fewer computer science and computer design courses and consistently rate themselves significantly lower than boys in terms of computer skills (AAUW, 1998); men outnumber women 6 to 1 in computer science Ph.D. programs (AAUW, 2000; Furger, 1998); and girls and boys are more likely to perceive computers as a male domain (Clewell, 2002; Eastman & Krendl, 1987). Due to our society's increasing dependence on technological skills, the continued existence of the technological gender and cultural gap is a problem that must be explored with vigor in order to ensure that the technological tools we use provide equitable1 access to and experiences for women and children of color.

[1]  Marcy M. Allen,et al.  The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look At Internet Access and the Digital Divide, Amanda Lenhart (Ed.). The Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2003) , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Joan Hanor,et al.  Concepts and Strategies Learned from Girls' Interactions with Computers. , 1998 .

[3]  H. Becker,et al.  Equity in School Computer Use: National Data and Neglected Considerations , 1987 .

[4]  I. Miura,et al.  Gender and Socioeconomic Status Differences in Middle-School Computer Interest and Use , 1987 .

[5]  Nichole Pinkard,et al.  Rappin' Reader and Say Say OH Playmate: Using Children's Childhood Songs as Literacy Scaffolds in Computer-Based Learning Environments , 2001 .

[6]  E. Bunderson,et al.  An Analysis of Retention Problems for Female Students in University Computer Science Programs , 1995 .

[7]  Jan Hawkins,et al.  Computers and girls: Rethinking the issues , 1985 .

[8]  Lily Shashaani.  Gender-Differences in Computer Experience and its Influence on Computer Attitudes , 1994 .

[9]  Susan K. Dyer.  Under the Microscope: A Decade of Gender Equity Projects in the Sciences. , 2004 .

[10]  Margaret Honey,et al.  Girls and Design: Exploring the Question of Technological Imagination , 1991 .

[11]  Barry J. Fishman,et al.  Bringing Urban Schools into the Information Age: Planning for Technology vs. Technology Planning , 2001 .

[12]  Nichole Pinkard,et al.  Lyric Reader: An Architecture for Creating Intrinsically Motivating and Culturally Responsive Reading Environments , 1999, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[13]  Leslie Miller,et al.  Girls' Preferences in Software Design: Insights from a Focus Group , 1996 .

[14]  Susan Tyler Eastman,et al.  Computers and Gender: Differential Effects of Electronic Search on Students' Achievement and Attitudes. , 1984 .

[15]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Mirrors of Minds: Patterns of Experience in Educational Computing , 1987 .

[16]  J. Schofield.  Computers and classroom culture , 1995 .

[17]  Nancy Nelson Knupfer.  Gender DiVisions Across Technology Advertisements and the WWW: Implications for Educational Equity , 1998 .