An Easy and Inexpensive Method for Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Damage by Using Vital Dye Staining and Adobe Photoshop Software

Purpose: We developed a simple, practical, and inexpensive technique to analyze areas of endothelial cell loss and/or damage over the entire corneal area after vital dye staining by using a readily available, off-the-shelf, consumer software program, Adobe Photoshop. The purpose of this article is to convey a method of quantifying areas of cell loss and/or damage. Methods: Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty corneal transplant surgery was performed by using 5 precut corneas on a human cadaver eye. Corneas were removed and stained with trypan blue and alizarin red S and subsequently photographed. Quantitative assessment of endothelial damage was performed by using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software. Results: The average difference for cell area damage for analyses performed by 1 observer twice was 1.41%. For analyses performed by 2 observers, the average difference was 1.71%. Three masked observers were 100% successful in matching the randomized stained corneas to their randomized processed Adobe images. Conclusions: Vital dye staining of corneal endothelial cells can be combined with Adobe Photoshop software to yield a quantitative assessment of areas of acute endothelial cell loss and/or damage. This described technique holds promise for a more consistent and accurate method to evaluate the surgical trauma to the endothelial cell layer in laboratory models. This method of quantitative analysis can probably be generalized to any area of research that involves areas that are differentiated by color or contrast.

[1]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  G. Peyman,et al.  A new technique for the vital staining of the corneal endothelium. , 1976, Investigative ophthalmology.

[3]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[4]  A. Ruggeri,et al.  A new system for the automatic estimation of endothelial cell density in donor corneas , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  E. Pels,et al.  A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. , 1998, Cornea.

[6]  Ross Gagliano,et al.  Review of , 2006, UBIQ.

[7]  M. Taylor,et al.  Dual staining of corneal endothelium with trypan blue and alizarin red S: importance of pH for the dye-lake reaction. , 1981, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Lawrence W. Hirst Fraco,et al.  The past, present, and future of clinical specular microscopy. , 1983 .

[9]  E. Pels,et al.  The effects of high molecular weight dextran on the preservation of human corneas. , 1984, Cornea.

[10]  A. Behrens,et al.  A new donor cornea harvesting technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Chuck,et al.  Microkeratome Preparation of Lamellar Corneal Grafts , 2006, Eye & contact lens.

[12]  M. Terry,et al.  Stability of vision, topography, and endothelial cell density from 1 year to 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty surgery. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[13]  M. Terry,et al.  Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[14]  D. Glasser,et al.  Endothelial protection and viscoelastic retention during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  Michael J Lynn,et al.  Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. , 2008, Cornea.

[16]  M. Terry Endothelial keratoplasty: history, current state, and future directions. , 2006, Cornea.

[17]  M. Mommaerts,et al.  Analysis of the cleft-lip nose in submental-vertical view, Part I--reliability of a new measurement instrument. , 2007, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[18]  R. Chuck,et al.  Femtosecond Laser Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: A Laboratory Model , 2005, Cornea.

[19]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Morphological image processing and network analysis of cornea endothelial cell images , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[20]  N. Rich,et al.  Effect of 1% sodium hyaluronate (Healon) on a nonregenerating (feline) corneal endothelium. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  P. Mulder,et al.  Endothelial cell density after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Melles techniques): 3 years follow-up. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  R. Chuck,et al.  Microkeratome Versus Femtosecond Laser Predissection of Corneal Grafts for Anterior and Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty , 2006, Cornea.

[23]  M. Terry,et al.  Stability of Vision, Topography, and Endothelial Cell Density from One Year to Two Years After Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty (DLEK) Surgery , 2004 .

[24]  N. Mamalis,et al.  Air bubble endothelial damage during phacoemulsification in human eye bank eyes: The protective effects of Healon and Viscoat , 1990, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.