Local-in-time adjoint-based method for design optimization of unsteady flows

We present a new local-in-time discrete adjoint-based methodology for solving design optimization problems arising in unsteady aerodynamic applications. The new methodology circumvents storage requirements associated with the straightforward implementation of a global adjoint-based optimization method that stores the entire flow solution history for all time levels. This storage cost may quickly become prohibitive for large-scale applications. The key idea of the local-in-time method is to divide the entire time interval into several subintervals and to approximate the solution of the unsteady adjoint equations and the sensitivity derivative as a combination of the corresponding local quantities computed on each time subinterval. Since each subinterval contains relatively few time levels, the storage cost of the local-in-time method is much lower than that of the global methods, thus making the time-dependent adjoint optimization feasible for practical applications. Another attractive feature of the new technique is that the converged solution obtained with the local-in-time method is a local extremum of the original optimization problem. The new method carries no computational overhead as compared with the global implementation of adjoint-based methods. The paper presents a detailed comparison of the global- and local-in-time adjoint-based methods for design optimization problems governed by the unsteady compressible 2-D Euler equations.

[1]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Recent improvements in aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes , 2001 .

[2]  Julia Sternberg,et al.  A-revolve: an adaptive memory-reduced procedure for calculating adjoints; with an application to computing adjoints of the instationary Navier–Stokes system , 2005, Optim. Methods Softw..

[3]  B. Diskin,et al.  Adjoint-based Methodology for Time-Dependent Optimization , 2008 .

[4]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  An Unsteady Discrete Adjoint Formulation for Two-Dimensional Flow Problems with Deforming Meshes , 2007 .

[5]  Foluso Ladeinde,et al.  A Comparison of Two POD Methods for Airfoil Design Optimization , 2005 .

[6]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Using an Adjoint Approach to Eliminate Mesh Sensitivities in Computational Design , 2005 .

[7]  Haecheon Choi,et al.  Suboptimal feedback control of vortex shedding at low Reynolds numbers , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  An Adjoint-Based Design Methodology for CFD Optimization Problems , 2003 .

[9]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  An implicit upwind algorithm for computing turbulent flows on unstructured grids , 1994 .

[10]  Antony Jameson,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF UNSTEADY FLOWS USING A TIME ACCURATE METHOD , 2002 .

[11]  R. LeVeque Approximate Riemann Solvers , 1992 .

[12]  Nail K. Yamaleev,et al.  Discrete Adjoint-Based Design Optimization of Unsteady Turbulent Flows on Dynamic Unstructured Grids , 2009 .

[13]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Investigation of non-linear projection for POD based reduced order models for Aerodynamics , 2001 .

[14]  A. Hay,et al.  Reduced-Order Models for parameter dependent geometries based on Shape Sensitivity Analysis of the POD , 2008 .

[15]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[16]  Roger Temam,et al.  A general framework for robust control in fluid mechanics , 2000 .

[17]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[18]  A. Walther,et al.  An optimal memory‐reduced procedure for calculating adjoints of the instationary Navier‐Stokes equations , 2006 .

[19]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  Helicopter Rotor Design Using a Time-Spectral and Adjoint-Based Method , 2008 .

[20]  J. N. Lyness,et al.  Numerical Differentiation of Analytic Functions , 1967 .

[21]  L. S. Hou,et al.  Dynamics and Approximations of a Velocity Tracking Problem for the Navier--Stokes Flows with Piecewise Distributed Controls , 1997 .

[22]  Karl Kunisch,et al.  Three Control Methods for Time-Dependent Fluid Flow , 2000 .

[23]  Antony Jameson,et al.  NON-LINEAR FREQUENCY DOMAIN BASED OPTIMUM SHAPE DESIGN FOR UNSTEADY THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOWS , 2006 .

[24]  Wr Graham,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF VORTEX SHEDDING USING LOW-ORDER MODELS. PART I-OPEN-LOOP MODEL DEVELOPMENT , 1999 .

[25]  V. Guinot Approximate Riemann Solvers , 2010 .