Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments

MANY secondary sexual characters are supposed to have evolved as a response to female choice of the most extravagantly ornamented males1, a hypothesis supported by studies demonstrating female preferences for the most ornamented males2–5. Comparative studies of elaborate feather ornaments in birds have shown that (1) ornaments have larger degrees of fluctuating asymmetry6 (small, random deviations from bilateral symmetry caused by an inability of individuals to cope with environmental and genetic stress during development of a character7) than other morphological traits, and (2) the degree of fluctuating asymmetry is often negatively related to the size of the ornament6. The negative relationship between ornament asymmetry and size suggests that ornament size reliably reflects male quality because the largest secondary sex traits demonstrate the least degree of fluctuating asymmetry. I manipulated tail length and tail asymmetry independently in male swallows (Hirundo rustica) to determine whether ornament size or asymmetry were used as cues in mate choice. Male swallows with elongated, symmetric tails mated earlier, and enjoyed larger annual reproductive success than did males with shortened tails and increased asymmetry. Females therefore prefer large as well as symmetric ornaments, which suggests that females in their mate choice use ornament asymmetry and size as reliable indicators of male quality.

[1]  M. Andersson Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird , 1982, Nature.

[2]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[4]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Fluctuating Asymmetry: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns , 1986 .

[5]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[6]  Wilhelm Ludwig,et al.  Das Rechts-Links-Problem im Tierreich und beim Menschen , 1932 .

[7]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[8]  M. Petrie,et al.  Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallow Hirundo rustica , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  A. Møller,et al.  Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow , 1988, Nature.

[12]  A. Møller,et al.  Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: implications for models of sexual selection , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Møller,et al.  Sexual ornament size and the cost of fluctuating asymmetry , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  P. Parsons,et al.  FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY: AN EPIGENETIC MEASURE OF STRESS , 1990, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.