Environment-adjusted operational performance evaluation of solar photovoltaic power plants: A three stage efficiency analysis

There is widespread concern that environmental factor may not be playing a pivotal role in influencing the generation performance of solar photovoltaic (PV) plants. The aim of this paper is to provide a fair and impartial operational performance evaluation of solar PV power plants taking into account of the impacts of environmental factors from real field data. Stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) is used to attribute the impacts of environmental factors (temperature, cloud amount, elevation, wind speed and precipitation) on inputs (like insolation and daylight hours) of solar PV power plants; while data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used to compute the environment-adjusted operational efficiency of these plants. SFA is utilized in the adjustment process for its merit of separating statistical noise from the error term, and DEA is used for its advantage of capturing the interaction among multiple inputs and outputs in a scalar value. The empirical analysis shows that the average operational efficiency of 70 grid-connected solar PV power plants in the United States slightly declines after accounting the impacts of environmental factors and statistical noise. Finally, the results partially support the initial concern from the statistical perspective and temperature is found to be the most significant influencing environmental factor, while precipitation and wind speed show no significant influence on operational efficiency. Therefore, the necessity of accounting for the impacts of environmental factors in the performance evaluation of solar PV power plants should not be omitted.

[1]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Effect of Dust Deposition on the Performance of Multi-Crystalline Photovoltaic Modules Based on Experimental Measurements , 2013 .

[2]  Austin Stanforth,et al.  Solar Panel Efficacy vs. Altitude in an Urban City Environment , 2015 .

[3]  Dezso Sera,et al.  Investigation of wind speed cooling effect on PV panels in windy locations , 2016 .

[4]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  Mohd. Kaleem Khan,et al.  Performance enhancement of solar collectors—A review , 2015 .

[6]  N. Rajasekar,et al.  A comprehensive review on solar PV maximum power point tracking techniques , 2017 .

[7]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  I. A. Raja,et al.  Insolation-sunshine relation with site elevation and latitude , 1994 .

[9]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[11]  Matthew Muller,et al.  Determining the effects of environment and atmospheric parameters on PV field performance , 2016, 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[12]  Dingtao Zhao,et al.  Influence of social media on operational efficiency of national scenic spots in china based on three-stage DEA model , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  Furkan Dincer,et al.  A review of the factors affecting operation and efficiency of photovoltaic based electricity generation systems , 2011 .

[15]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  Incorporating the Operating Environment Into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[16]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: An illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data☆ , 2009 .

[17]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Energy policy and financing options to achieve solar energy grid penetration targets: Accounting for external costs , 2014 .

[18]  Pascal Henry Biwole,et al.  Cooling methodologies of photovoltaic module for enhancing electrical efficiency: A review , 2017 .

[19]  Brian Norton,et al.  Optimal sizing of array and inverter for grid-connected photovoltaic systems , 2006 .

[20]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[21]  P. Zhou,et al.  Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure , 2012 .

[22]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Forest and rangeland ecosystem condition indicators: identifying national areas of opportunity using data development analysis , 2004 .

[23]  N. Gomesh,et al.  Indoor Test Performance of PV Panel through Water Cooling Method , 2015 .

[24]  Manuel Fuentes,et al.  Modelling the influence of atmospheric conditions on the outdoor real performance of a CPV (Concentrated Photovoltaic) module , 2014 .

[25]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Nanofluids for improved efficiency in cooling solar collectors – A review , 2014 .

[26]  Shin'ya Obara,et al.  Output prediction of large-scale photovoltaics by wind-condition analysis using 3D topographic maps , 2014 .

[27]  Miqdam T. Chaichan,et al.  Experimental analysis of the effect of dust’s physical properties on photovoltaic modules in Northern Oman , 2016 .

[28]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Location optimization of solar plants by an integrated hierarchical DEA PCA approach , 2008 .

[29]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  On-site PV characterization and the effect of soiling on their performance , 2013 .

[30]  Y. Cui,et al.  Estimating regional coal resource efficiency in China using three-stage DEA and bootstrap DEA models , 2015 .

[31]  José Manuel Pastor,et al.  Credit risk and efficiency in the European banking system: A three-stage analysis , 2002 .

[32]  Terry Rowlands,et al.  How to better identify the true managerial performance: State of the art using DEA , 2008 .

[33]  Hongliang Yang,et al.  Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[34]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  Purging data before productivity analysis , 2010 .

[35]  Shree Raj Shakya,et al.  Dust accumulation effects on efficiency of solar PV modules for off grid purpose: A case study of Kathmandu , 2016 .

[36]  H. O. Fried,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002 .

[37]  Dennis Moon,et al.  Observed Impacts of Transient Clouds on Utility Scale PV Fields , 2010 .

[38]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Energy efficiency of PV panels under real outdoor conditions–An experimental assessment in Athens, Greece , 2017 .

[39]  Yukiharu Uraoka,et al.  Field-test analysis of PV system output characteristics focusing on module temperature , 2003 .

[40]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: A comparative study by data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[41]  N. H. Saad,et al.  Enhancing the design of battery charging controllers for photovoltaic systems , 2016 .

[42]  John K. Kaldellis,et al.  Systematic experimental study of the pollution deposition impact on the energy yield of photovoltaic installations , 2011 .

[43]  Furkan Dincer,et al.  Critical Factors that Affecting Efficiency of Solar Cells , 2010 .

[44]  D. Zha,et al.  Performance evaluation of Chinese photovoltaic companies with the input-oriented dynamic SBM model , 2016 .

[45]  Valerie Eveloy,et al.  Thermal management of solar photovoltaics modules for enhanced power generation , 2015 .

[46]  Yusuf Al-Turki,et al.  On the investigation of photovoltaic output power reduction due to dust accumulation and weather conditions , 2016 .

[47]  J. Apt,et al.  The character of power output from utility‐scale photovoltaic systems , 2008 .

[48]  J. K. Kaldellis,et al.  Ash deposition impact on the energy performance of photovoltaic generators , 2011 .

[49]  Syed A.M. Said,et al.  Effect of dust accumulation on the power outputs of solar photovoltaic modules , 2013 .

[50]  P. Mandal,et al.  Progress in plasmonic solar cell efficiency improvement: A status review , 2016 .

[51]  Hai Jiang,et al.  Experimental investigation of the impact of airborne dust deposition on the performance of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules , 2011 .

[52]  Xingxing Zhang,et al.  Review of R&D progress and practical application of the solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) technologies. , 2012 .

[53]  M. Irwanto,et al.  Building integrated photovoltaic: Analysis of wind effect due to convection heat transfer , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE).

[54]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Solar thermal collectors and applications , 2004 .

[55]  Rohit Pillai,et al.  Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations , 2010 .

[56]  Yang Shao,et al.  Controlling for exogenous environmental variables when using data envelopment analysis for regional environmental assessments. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[57]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Experimental investigation of dust pollutants and the impact of environmental parameters on PV performance: an experimental study , 2018, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[58]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Environment-adjusted total-factor energy efficiency of Taiwan's service sectors , 2013, Energy Policy.

[59]  E. Skoplaki,et al.  Operating temperature of photovoltaic modules: A survey of pertinent correlations , 2009 .