Now You See Me, Now You Don't: Environmental Conditions, Signaler Behavior, and Receiver Response Thresholds Interact to Determine the Efficacy of a Movement-Based Animal Signal

Knowledge of the environment in which animals operate and the sensory processing demands that mediate behavior in an ecological context are crucial for understanding animal communication systems. Understanding how environmental factors constrain communication strategies requires quantifying both the signal and noise in detail, as has been demonstrated in studies of acoustic and color signals for some time. However, comparable analyzes of movement-based animal signals and the signalling environment is limited. There is now growing evidence that the dynamics of motion noise, in the form of wind-blown plant-movement, are a major sensory constraint for movement-based signals. However, progress has been limited as traditional techniques for understanding the ecological constraints on movement-based signals have proven insufficient. Our study utilized an innovative approach to quantify motion ecology by simulating a signaling animal in a natural habitat using highly realistic 3D animations, which afforded us unprecedented control over the signal and the circumstances in which signalling takes place. Using the Jacky dragon Amphibolurus muricatus as a model species, we quantified the efficacy of signal in noise under different combinations of wind and dapple light intensities, and quantified the potential benefit of signaling faster, or in different orientations relative to the background. We also examined signal performance as a function of varying receiver operating characteristics. Our results suggest that prevailing environmental conditions at the time of signaling do indeed affect the efficacy of movement-based signals, with wind and light levels interacting to influence efficacy. We found that faster speeds and selecting particular orientations can be beneficial, but signal efficacy comes down to the interaction between wind conditions, intensity of dappled light, signaler orientation and thresholds for receiver responses.

[1]  Andrew C. Mason,et al.  Measuring and quantifying dynamic visual signals in jumping spiders , 2006 .

[2]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Noise Matters: The Evolution of Communication , 2015 .

[3]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[4]  M. Ryan,et al.  THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION IN INTRASPECIFIC DIVERGENCE OF MATE RECOGNITION SIGNALS IN THE CRICKET FROG, ACRIS CREPITANS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  R. Peters,et al.  Signaling against the Wind: Modifying Motion-Signal Structure in Response to Increased Noise , 2007, Current Biology.

[6]  P. Chapman,et al.  Visual Search of Driving Situations: Danger and Experience , 1998, Perception.

[7]  Yubo Zhang,et al.  Quartz: an autonomous navigation system for MOUT simulations , 2007 .

[8]  J. Endler,et al.  Interacting Effects of Lek Placement, Display Behavior, Ambient Light, and Color Patterns in Three Neotropical Forest-Dwelling Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[9]  L. Fleishman Motion detection in the presence and absence of background motion in anAnolis lizard , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Richard A. Peters,et al.  Noise in Visual Communication: Motion from Wind-Blown Plants , 2013 .

[11]  J. Krebs,et al.  Geographical Variation in the Song of the Great Tit (Parus major) in Relation to Ecological Factors , 1979 .

[12]  R. Peters,et al.  Display response of the Jacky Dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus (Lacertilia: Agamidae), to intruders: A semi-Markovian process , 2003 .

[13]  L. Fleishman,et al.  The influence of stimulus and background colour on signal visibility in the lizard Anolis cristatellus. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Jun Ohya,et al.  Modeling and animation of botanical trees for interactive virtual environments , 1999, VRST '99.

[15]  R. Peters Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals , 2008, Biology Letters.

[16]  Alain Fournier,et al.  Stochastic Motion—Motion Under the Influence of Wind , 1992, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[17]  Amitava Datta,et al.  Animating real-time realistic movements in small plants , 2004, GRAPHITE '04.

[18]  Katsuhiro Kitajima,et al.  Computer animation of swaying trees based on physical simulation , 2006, Comput. Graph..

[19]  R. Peters,et al.  Dragon wars: Movement-based signalling by Australian agamid lizards in relation to species ecology , 2016 .

[20]  C. G. Sibley ECOLOGICAL SOURCES OF SELECTION ON AVIAN SOUNDS , 2004 .

[21]  Jochen J. Steil,et al.  Where to Look Next? Combining Static and Dynamic Proto-objects in a TVA-based Model of Visual Attention , 2010, Cognitive Computation.

[22]  R. Peters,et al.  Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Norishige Chiba,et al.  Wind Field Synthesis for Animating Wind-induced Vibration , 2011, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[24]  Jos Stam,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics: Simulating the Effects of Turbulence on Flexible Structures , 1997 .

[25]  R. Peters,et al.  Integrating evolutionary biology with digital arts to quantify ecological constraints on vision‐based behaviour , 2017 .

[26]  X. Bian,et al.  The swaying behavior of Extatosoma tiaratum: motion camouflage in a stick insect? , 2016 .

[27]  J. Endler Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[29]  C. Clifford,et al.  Measuring the structure of dynamic visual signals , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  R. Cocroft,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication , 2005 .

[31]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  HABITAT-DEPENDENT SONG DIVERGENCE IN THE LITTLE GREENBUL: AN ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION PRESSURES ON ACOUSTIC SIGNALS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Julien Diener,et al.  Wind projection basis for real‐time animation of trees , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[33]  D. H. Owings,et al.  Ground squirrels use an infrared signal to deter rattlesnake predation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  R. Peters,et al.  Social context affects tail displays by Phrynocephalus vlangalii lizards from China , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  R. Menzel,et al.  Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT , 2006 .

[37]  H. Cogger Reproductive cycles, fat body cycles and socio-sexual behaviour in the Mallee dragon, Amphibolurus fordi (Lacertilia : Agamidae) , 1978 .

[38]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  S. Wuerger,et al.  The perception of motion in chromatic stimuli. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[40]  Debasish Biswas,et al.  Visualization of unsteady viscous flow around turbine blade , 2008, J. Vis..

[41]  J. Lythgoe The Ecology of vision , 1979 .

[42]  T. Ord,et al.  Gliding lizards use the position of the sun to enhance social display , 2017, Biology Letters.

[43]  J. Atema Chemical signals in the marine environment: dispersal, detection, and temporal signal analysis. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  R. A. Peters,et al.  Design of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal and noise characteristics in a complex moving environment , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[45]  W. Singer,et al.  Two segmentation mechanisms with differential sensitivity for colour and luminance contrast , 1998, Vision Research.

[46]  J. Zeil,et al.  Towards an Ecology of Motion Vision , 2001 .

[47]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[48]  Adam C Pallus,et al.  Motion perception and visual signal design in Anolis lizards , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Seismic communication in amphibians , 1994 .

[50]  Gil G. Rosenthal,et al.  Technical and conceptual considerations for using animated stimuli in studies of animal behavior , 2016, Current zoology.

[51]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Graph-Based Visual Saliency , 2006, NIPS.

[52]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[53]  H. Harmon,et al.  Geographic Variation in Sexual Dichromatism in the Collared Lizard, Crotaphytus collaris (Sauria: Crotaphytidae) , 1997 .

[54]  R. Peters,et al.  Quantifying Ecological Constraints on Motion Signaling , 2017, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[55]  R. Peters,et al.  The Effect of Variation in Prey Movement on the Predatory Response of Jacky Lizards (Amphibolurus muricatus) , 2008 .

[56]  Thomas W. Pike,et al.  Quantifying camouflage and conspicuousness using visual salience , 2018 .

[57]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Concealment in a dynamic world: dappled light and caustics mask movement , 2018, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  J. Endler On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns , 1990 .

[59]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning , 2005 .

[60]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  Norishige Chiba,et al.  A hybrid method for real-time animation of trees swaying in wind fields , 2004, The Visual Computer.

[62]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Ecology and signal evolution in lizards , 2002 .

[63]  Tyson L Hedrick,et al.  Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[64]  M. Land,et al.  The Roles of Vision and Eye Movements in the Control of Activities of Daily Living , 1998, Perception.

[65]  Matthew H Tong,et al.  SUN: Top-down saliency using natural statistics , 2009, Visual cognition.

[66]  P. Slater,et al.  The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[68]  Leo J. Fleishman,et al.  Sensory influences on physical design of a visual display , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  R. Macedo,et al.  Here comes the sun: multimodal displays are associated with sunlight incidence , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[70]  M. Leal,et al.  Differences in Visual Signal Design and Detectability between Allopatric Populations of Anolis Lizards , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[71]  J. Swets The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology , 1973, Science.

[72]  Richard A. Peters,et al.  COMMENTARIES Measuring the structure of dynamic visual signals , 2002 .

[73]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[74]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  Detection of coloured patterns by honeybees through chromatic and achromatic cues , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[75]  T. Schoener,et al.  Predation-associated modulation of movement-based signals by a Bahamian lizard , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Signal Detection, Noise, and the Evolution of Communication , 2013 .

[77]  M. Stoffel,et al.  Wintering Snowy Owls Bubo scandiacus integrate plumage colour, behaviour and their environment to maximize efficacy of visual displays , 2011 .

[78]  Jochen Zeil,et al.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[79]  L. Fleishman Sensory and environmental influences on display form in Anolis auratus, a grass anole from Panama , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[80]  C. Koch,et al.  From stimulus encoding to feature extraction in weakly electric fish , 1996, Nature.

[81]  P. Hannah,et al.  Wind and Trees: Predicting windspeeds for forest areas in complex terrain , 1995 .

[82]  J. Stamps,et al.  Alert signals enhance animal communication in “noisy” environments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[83]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Signal Detection and Animal Communication , 2006 .

[84]  J. Endler The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications , 1993 .

[85]  Michael Wimmer,et al.  Physically Guided Animation of Trees , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[86]  L. Fleishman The Influence of the Sensory System and the Environment on Motion Patterns in the Visual Displays of Anoline Lizards and Other Vertebrates , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[87]  G. Kuhn,et al.  Magic and Fixation: Now You Don't See it, Now You Do , 2005, Perception.

[88]  A. Radford,et al.  Fitness costs as well as benefits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise , 2014 .

[89]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Seismic Communication in Anuran AmphibiansWhite-lipped frogs thump the ground as they chirp , 1990 .