Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods

The correction of presbyopia and restoration of true accommodative function to the ageing eye is the focus of much ongoing research and clinical work. A range of accommodating intraocular lenses (AIOLs) implanted during cataract surgery has been developed and they are designed to change either their position or shape in response to ciliary muscle contraction to generate an increase in dioptric power. Two main design concepts exist. First, axial shift concepts rely on anterior axial movement of one or two optics creating accommodative ability. Second, curvature change designs are designed to provide significant amplitudes of accommodation with little physical displacement. Single‐optic devices have been used most widely, although the true accommodative ability provided by forward shift of the optic appears limited and recent findings indicate that alternative factors such as flexing of the optic to alter ocular aberrations may be responsible for the enhanced near vision reported in published studies. Techniques for analysing the performance of AIOLs have not been standardised and clinical studies have reported findings using a wide range of both subjective and objective methods, making it difficult to gauge the success of these implants. There is a need for longitudinal studies using objective methods to assess long‐term performance of AIOLs and to determine if true accommodation is restored by the designs available. While dual‐optic and curvature change IOLs are designed to provide greater amplitudes of accommodation than is possible with single‐optic devices, several of these implants are in the early stages of development and require significant further work before human use is possible. A number of challenges remain and must be addressed before the ultimate goal of restoring youthful levels of accommodation to the presbyopic eye can be achieved.

[1]  J Stuart Cumming,et al.  Performance of the crystalens. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[2]  O. Nishi,et al.  Accommodation amplitude after lens refilling with injectable silicone by sealing the capsule with a plug in primates. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  R F Fisher,et al.  Presbyopia and the water content of the human crystalline lens , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  N Orzalesi,et al.  Performance of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in extracapsular cataract surgery , 1994, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  L. J. Summers,et al.  Diffractive Alvarez lens. , 2000, Optics letters.

[6]  Lisa Toto,et al.  Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  Murat Dogru,et al.  Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  B Gilmartin,et al.  The aetiology of presbyopia: a summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  Jane F. Koretz,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye—aging of the anterior segment , 1989, Vision Research.

[10]  M. Leyland,et al.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[11]  G. L. Van Der Heijde,et al.  Pseudo-accommodation in Pseudophakia , 1992 .

[12]  Geoff Neilson,et al.  Selective death of lens epithelial cells using demineralized water and Triton X-100 with PerfectCapsule sealed capsule irrigation: a histological study in rabbit eyes. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Mathews,et al.  Scleral expansion surgery does not restore accommodation in human presbyopia. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[14]  Sunil Shah,et al.  Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  P R Preussner,et al.  [Accommodative lens implant]. , 2001, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[16]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[17]  Roberto Pineda,et al.  Accommodating Intraocular Lenses: Theory and Practice , 2010, International ophthalmology clinics.

[18]  Charles D Reilly,et al.  Surgical Monovision and Monovision Reversal in LASIK , 2006, Cornea.

[19]  F. Manns,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Accommodation Amplitude and Ametropia Correction by Varying Refractive Index in Phaco-Ersatz , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  H Burkhard Dick,et al.  Single optic accommodative intraocular lenses. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[21]  S P Percival,et al.  Prospectively randomized trial comparing the pseudoaccommodation of the AMO ARRAY multifocal lens and a monofocal lens , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  D J Coleman,et al.  On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. , 1986, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[23]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  C. Huber,et al.  Myopic astigmatism a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia , 1981, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[25]  Donald R Sanders,et al.  Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[26]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[27]  James S. Wolffsohn,et al.  In vivo Biometric Evaluation of Phakic and Pseudophakic Eyes During Accommodation With Optical Coherence Tomography , 2008 .

[28]  J W BETTMAN,et al.  Apparent accommodation in aphakic eyes. , 1950, American journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  V. Portney,et al.  A dual optic accommodating foldable intraocular lens , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  Alexander Duane,et al.  NORMAL VALUES OF THE ACCOMMODATION AT ALL AGES , 1912 .

[31]  M Millodot,et al.  Presbyopia correction and the accommodation in reserve , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[32]  O. Findl,et al.  Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[33]  R P Rutstein,et al.  Comparing the Amplitude of Accommodation Determined Objectively and Subjectively , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[34]  Donald R Sanders,et al.  Functional reading acuity and performance: Comparison of 2 accommodating intraocular lenses , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[35]  S. Strenk,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of aging, accommodating, phakic, and pseudophakic ciliary muscle diameters , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[36]  Pamela J Blade,et al.  Validation of the PowerRefractor for Measuring Human Infant Refraction , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  G. U. Auffarth,et al.  Validität der Vorderkammertiefenmessung zur Akkommodationsevaluierung nach Implantation einer akkommodativen Intraokularlinse (Modell Humanoptics 1CU) , 2002, Der Ophthalmologe.

[38]  Michel Millodot Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science , 1997 .

[39]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Synchrony dual‐optic accommodating intraocular lens: Part 2: Pilot clinical evaluation , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[40]  Erik A Hermans,et al.  Development of a ciliary muscle–driven accommodating intraocular lens , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[41]  H Burkhard Dick,et al.  Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status , 2005, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[42]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens: a randomized trial. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[43]  John Corzine Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science, 6th ed. , 2005 .

[44]  John M Sparrow,et al.  Cataract surgical rates: is there overprovision in certain areas? , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[45]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[46]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[47]  Emilio Pedrotti,et al.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: Pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[48]  H B Dick,et al.  [Dynamic aberrometry during accommodation of phakic eyes and eyes with potentially accommodative intraocular lenses]. , 2002, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[49]  John F Doane,et al.  Accommodative intraocular lenses: considerations on use, function and design , 2007, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[50]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann‐Shack aberrometry , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[51]  G. Sanderson,et al.  Apparent accommodation and depth of field in pseudophakia , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[52]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K Autorefractor , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[53]  M. Azzolini,et al.  Zonal photorefractive keratectomy for presbyopia. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.

[54]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[55]  Mark Packer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT‐45 accommodating intraocular lens: Results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[56]  J. Marshall,et al.  Fellow‐eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[57]  Kazuno Negishi,et al.  Biconvex posterior chamber accommodating intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery: Long‐term outcomes , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[58]  W. Charman,et al.  Dynamic retinoscopy and accommodation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[59]  Leon N Davies,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM‐5500 , 2010, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[60]  P. Hugger,et al.  Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[61]  J L Semmlow,et al.  Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[62]  Oliver Stachs,et al.  Pharmacological-induced haptic changes and the accommodative performance in patients with the AT-45 accommodative IOL. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[63]  Oliver Findl,et al.  Meta‐analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[64]  Corina van de Pol,et al.  Intracorneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[65]  J. Sivak,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Human Ciliary Muscle , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[66]  W. Charman The eye in focus: accommodation and presbyopia , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[67]  I Schmack,et al.  [Validity of anterior chamber depth measurements for the evaluation of accommodation after implantation of an accommodative Humanoptics 1CU intraocular lens]. , 2002, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[68]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[69]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Evaluation of the measurement of refractive error by the PowerRefractor: a remote, continuous and binocular measurement system of oculomotor function , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[70]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[71]  R. Fisher Elastic constants of the human lens capsule , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[72]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Accommodative intraocular lens with spring action--Part 2. Fixation in the living rabbit. , 1992, Ophthalmic surgery.

[73]  M. Campbell,et al.  Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia , 1999, Vision Research.

[74]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Pilocarpine‐induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT‐45 Crystalens , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[75]  M A Parafita,et al.  The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction , 2005, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[76]  Jane F. Koretz,et al.  Modeling age-related accomodative loss in the human eye , 1986 .

[77]  W N Charman,et al.  Restoring accommodation to the presbyopic eye: how do we measure success? , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[78]  O Nishi,et al.  Amplitudes of accommodation of primate lenses refilled with two types of inflatable endocapsular balloons. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[79]  A. S. Vilupuru,et al.  Accommodative lens refilling in rhesus monkeys. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[80]  Ken Hayashi,et al.  Aging changes in apparent accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[81]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Stability of refraction, accommodation, and lens position after implantation of the 1CU accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[82]  V. Portney,et al.  Synchrony dual‐optic accommodating intraocular lens: Part 1: Optical and biomechanical principles and design considerations , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[83]  Jorge L. Alió,et al.  Feasibility and development of a high‐power real accommodating intraocular lens , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[84]  Oliver Stachs,et al.  Performance of the Crystalens/Reply , 2006 .

[85]  Oliver Findl,et al.  Lens refilling to restore accommodation. , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[86]  James S. Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor in adults , 2001 .

[87]  F Verzella,et al.  Multifocal effect of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. , 1993, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[88]  Clifton M Schor,et al.  Charles F. Prentice Award Lecture 2008: Surgical Correction of Presbyopia with Intraocular Lenses Designed to Accommodate , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[89]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Restoration of accommodation. , 2006, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[90]  Rafael Navarro,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of Zywave, Tracey, and experimental aberrometers. , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[91]  Coleman Dj,et al.  On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. , 1986 .

[92]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[93]  Geoff Neilson,et al.  Selective and specific targeting of lens epithelial cells during cataract surgery using sealed- capsule irrigation. , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[94]  Kamlesh,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. , 2001, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[95]  L N Thibos,et al.  Principles of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[96]  J C Javitt,et al.  Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[97]  M. Macsai,et al.  Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[98]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[99]  J. Marshall,et al.  Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[100]  T. Olsen,et al.  Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[101]  D. Azar,et al.  Monovision Achieved with Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery , 2001, International ophthalmology clinics.

[102]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Sarfarazi Elliptical Accommodating IntraOcular Lens (EAIOL) in Rhesus Monkey Eyes In Vitro and In Vivo , 2003 .

[103]  Jay S Pepose,et al.  Maximizing satisfaction with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: the missing links. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[104]  Oliver Stachs,et al.  Monitoring accommodative ciliary muscle function using three-dimensional ultrasound , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[105]  D. Apple,et al.  The 50th anniversary of the intraocular lens and a quiet revolution. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[106]  M Nakazawa,et al.  Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. , 1983, American journal of ophthalmology.

[107]  H. Dick,et al.  Dynamische Aberrometrie während der Akkommodation phaker Augen sowie Augen mit potenziell akkommodativer Intraokularlinse , 2002, Der Ophthalmologe.

[108]  M. Holzer,et al.  Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[109]  R. Shack,et al.  History and principles of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[110]  法杰·M·萨法拉齐 Sarfarazi elliptical accommodative intraocular lens for small incision surgery , 2003 .

[111]  L Werner,et al.  Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[112]  George Smith,et al.  Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[113]  M Rosenfield,et al.  Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[114]  P. Kaufman,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia. , 2001, International ophthalmology clinics.

[115]  M Millodot,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1. , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[116]  T. Oshika,et al.  Anterior shift of zonular insertion onto the anterior surface of human crystalline lens with age. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[117]  W Drexler,et al.  Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[118]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. , 2005 .

[119]  J. Marshall,et al.  Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[120]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[121]  J. Bauerberg Centered vs. inferior off-center ablation to correct hyperopia and presbyopia. , 1999, Journal of refractive surgery.

[122]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Accommodative intraocular lens with spring action. Part 1. Design and placement in an excised animal eye. , 1990, Ophthalmic surgery.

[123]  Navneet Gupta,et al.  Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[124]  W. Trattler,et al.  Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[125]  Faezeh Mona Sarfarazi,et al.  Sarfarazi dual optic accommodative intraocular lens. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[126]  A. Foster Vision 2020: the cataract challenge. , 2000, Community eye health.

[127]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  Dynamic performance of accommodating intraocular lenses in a negative feedback control system: A simulation-based study , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[128]  J Wollensak,et al.  Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[129]  R. Guthoff,et al.  [Ultrasound biomicroscopy imaging of accommodative configuration changes in the presbyopic ciliary body]. , 1996, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[130]  Achim Langenbucher,et al.  Accommodation after Nd: YAG capsulotomy in patients with accommodative posterior chamber lens 1CU , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[131]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Comparison of pilocarpine-induced and stimulus-driven accommodation in phakic eyes. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[132]  Wolfgang Haigis,et al.  Laserinterferometric measurements of accommodative changes in the position of an optic-shift intraocular lens. , 2009, Journal of refractive surgery.

[133]  P.-R. Preußner,et al.  Akkommodatives Linsenimplantat , 2001, Der Ophthalmologe.

[134]  T. Wong,et al.  Cycloplegic refraction in preschool children: comparisons between the hand‐held autorefractor, table‐mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy , 2009, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.