Analysis of the Structure of Surgical Activity for a Suturing and Knot-Tying Task

Background Surgical tasks are performed in a sequence of steps, and technical skill evaluation includes assessing task flow efficiency. Our objective was to describe differences in task flow for expert and novice surgeons for a basic surgical task. Methods We used a hierarchical semantic vocabulary to decompose and annotate maneuvers and gestures for 135 instances of a surgeon’s knot performed by 18 surgeons. We compared counts of maneuvers and gestures, and analyzed task flow by skill level. Results Experts used fewer gestures to perform the task (26.29; 95% CI = 25.21 to 27.38 for experts vs. 31.30; 95% CI = 29.05 to 33.55 for novices) and made fewer errors in gestures than novices (1.00; 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.39 vs. 2.84; 95% CI = 2.3 to 3.37). Transitions among maneuvers, and among gestures within each maneuver for expert trials were more predictable than novice trials. Conclusions Activity segments and state flow transitions within a basic surgical task differ by surgical skill level, and can be used to provide targeted feedback to surgical trainees.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  Marc Immenroth,et al.  Mental Training in Surgical Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[3]  Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al.  Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .

[4]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Patterns of Technical Error Among Surgical Malpractice Claims: An Analysis of Strategies to Prevent Injury to Surgical Patients , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[6]  F. D'Auria,et al.  Gesture recognition and classification for surgical skill assessment , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications.

[7]  Stefanie Speidel,et al.  Recognition of surgical skills using hidden Markov models , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Sanjeev Khudanpur,et al.  Learning and inference algorithms for dynamical system models of dextrous motion , 2011 .

[9]  D. Yuh,et al.  Objective measures for longitudinal assessment of robotic surgery training. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  Sandeep Aggarwal,et al.  Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, et al. Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1434–1442 , 2014 .

[11]  Bummo Ahn,et al.  Event-driven Surgical Gesture Segmentation and Task Recognition for Ocular Trauma Simulation , 2012, Intelligent Environments.

[12]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Richard M Satava,et al.  Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Generalized approach for modeling minimally invasive surgery as a stochastic process using a discrete Markov model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  String Motif-Based Description of Tool Motion for Detecting Skill and Gestures in Robotic Surgery , 2013, MICCAI.

[16]  A. Goh,et al.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Emden R. Gansner,et al.  Graphviz and Dynagraph – Static and Dynamic Graph Drawing Tools , 2003 .

[18]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Task versus Subtask Surgical Skill Evaluation of Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2009, MICCAI.

[19]  Amod Jog,et al.  Assessing system operation skills in robotic surgery trainees , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[20]  Gregory Loan,et al.  Board 512 - Technology Innovations Abstract Events Driven Surgical Gesture Recognition Validation on Eyelid Laceration Surgery Simulation (Submission #1357) , 2013 .

[21]  R. Bell,et al.  Why Johnny cannot operate. , 2009, Surgery.

[22]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Sparse Hidden Markov Models for Surgical Gesture Classification and Skill Evaluation , 2012, IPCAI.

[23]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Structure in surgical motion , 2010 .

[24]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  M. Iskander,et al.  The assessment of surgical competence , 2015, Medical teacher.

[26]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Pairwise Comparison-Based Objective Score for Automated Skill Assessment of Segments in a Surgical Task , 2014, IPCAI.

[27]  René Vidal,et al.  Surgical Gesture Classification from Video Data , 2012, MICCAI.

[28]  Lavie Pinchas Golenberg.  Task Analysis, Modeling, And Automatic Identification Of Elemental Tasks In Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery , 2010 .

[29]  George C Velmahos,et al.  Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[30]  C G Cao,et al.  Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic procedures. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[31]  Yuvraj Ratan Naikavde.  Robotic Surgical Skill Assessment Based on Pattern Classification Tools , 2012 .

[32]  Richard Clark,et al.  Integrated studies on the use of cognitive task analysis to capture surgical expertise for central venous catheter placement and open cricothyrotomy. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[33]  Ali Tavakkolizadeh,et al.  Utilization of a cognitive task analysis for laparoscopic appendectomy to identify differentiated intraoperative teaching objectives. , 2012, American journal of surgery.