Integrated food, energy and environmental services production as an alternative for small rural properties in Brazil

Energy from sources alternative to fossil fuels is being studied and interest in energy derived from vegetal biomass is increasing. In Brazil - mainly at Sao Paulo State -, sugarcane ethanol is being intensively produced on large-scales, giving rise to social and environmental concerns about its production. If ethanol production systems are to maintain a balance between economic, social and environmental aspects, a systemic approach needs to be considered in their assessment. Particularly, human needs other than energy must be taken into account. In this sense, the Integrated Food, Energy and Environmental Services Production (IFEES) on small-scale suggests an alternative approach. The aim of this work is to assess, in a multi-criteria way, the energetic-environmental aspects of a common IFEES found in Brazil and compare its indices against large-scale ethanol production. For this, embodied energy analysis, emergy accounting, ecological rucksack and gas emission inventory are used as tools. Results show that IFEES has better overall energetic-environmental indices than large-scale ethanol production. At the same time, IFEES produces several other by-products than just ethanol (i.e. food, forestry products and environmental services), although productivity of large-scale process is 25 times higher than for IFEES, if only ethanol is considered.

[1]  Torbjörn Rydberg,et al.  Emergy evaluation on the production, processing and export of coffee in Nicaragua , 2006 .

[2]  J. Seabra,et al.  Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. , 2008 .

[3]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[4]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  A Prosperous Way Down: Principles And Policies , 2001 .

[5]  S. Filoso,et al.  Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  I. Boustead,et al.  Handbook of industrial energy analysis , 1979 .

[7]  Luis Augusto Barbosa Cortez,et al.  Can Brazil replace 5% of the 2025 gasoline world demand with ethanol? , 2009 .

[8]  David Biello,et al.  The false promise of biofuels. , 2011, Scientific American.

[9]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Assessment of a large watershed in Brazil using Emergy Evaluation and Geographical Information System , 2010 .

[10]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil , 2010 .

[11]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol - an assessment of the possibilities of certified production , 2007 .

[12]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Sustainable biomass production: A comparison between Gross Energy Requirement and Emergy Synthesis methods , 2009 .

[13]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  The Center for Environmental Policy , 2003 .

[14]  Cinthia Rubio Urbano da Silva,et al.  Sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Brazil considering land use change, GHG emissions and socio-economic aspects , 2011 .

[15]  Handan Akcaoz,et al.  ENERGY REQUIREMENT AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CITRUS PRODUCTION IN TURKEY , 2004 .

[16]  A. A. Jensen.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) : a guide to approaches, experiences and information sources , 1998 .

[17]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Brazilian Soybean Production: Emergy Analysis With an Expanded Scope , 2005 .

[18]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): Assessing the implications of allocation , 2006 .

[19]  David R. Tilley,et al.  Integrated energy, environmental and financial analysis of ethanol production from cellulosic switchgrass , 2009 .

[20]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy, nutrients balance, and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil , 2009 .

[21]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Sustainability assessment of large-scale ethanol production from sugarcane , 2010 .

[22]  J. Goldemberg,et al.  Are biofuels a feasible option , 2009 .

[23]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  The use of emergy assessment and the Geographical Information System in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil , 2008 .

[24]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[25]  F. Alves.  Certificação socioambiental para a agricultura : desafios para o setor sucroalcooleiro , 2008 .

[26]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil , 2006 .

[27]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil , 2009 .

[28]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Overcoming the inadequacy of single-criterion approaches to Life Cycle Assessment , 2006 .

[29]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  An emergy evaluation of complexity, information and technology, towards maximum power and zero emissions , 2007 .

[30]  J. Laherrère,et al.  The End of Cheap Oil , 1998 .

[31]  B. E. Vaughan,et al.  Ethanol as Fuel: Energy, Carbon Dioxide Balances, and Ecological Footprint , 2005 .

[32]  Stelvia Matos,et al.  Brazilian biofuels and social exclusion: established and concentrated ethanol versus emerging and dispersed biodiesel , 2009 .

[33]  Tim Lang,et al.  Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket , 2005 .

[34]  C. Hall,et al.  Revisiting the Limits to Growth After Peak Oil : In the 1970s a rising world population and the finite resources available to support it were hot topics. Interest faded-but it's time to take another look , 2009 .