A probabilistic assessment of ground condition prediction ahead of TBM tunnels combining each geophysical prediction method

It is usually not an easy task to counter-measure on time and appropriately when confronting with troubles in mechanized tunnelling job-sites because of the limitation of available spaces to perform those actions with the existence of disk cutter, cutter head, chamber and other various apparatus in Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM). So, it is important to predict the ground condition ahead of a tunnel face during tunnel excavation. Efforts have been made to utilize geophysical methods such as elastic wave survey, electromagnetic wave survey, electrical resistivity survey, etc for predicting the ground condition ahead of the TBM tunnel face. Each prediction method among these geophysical methods has its own advantage and disadvantage. Therefore, it might be needed to apply several geophysical methods rather than just one to predict the ground condition ahead of the tunnel face in the complex and/or mixed grounds since those methods will compensate among others. The problem is that each prediction method will give us different answer on the predicted ground condition; how to combine different solutions into a most reasonable and representative predicted value might be important. Therefore, in this study, we proposed a methodology how to systematically combine each prediction method utilizing probabilistic analysis as well as analytic hierarchy process. The proposed methods is applied to a virtual job site to confirm the applicability of the model to predict the ground condition ahead of the tunnel face in the mechanized tunnelling.

[1]  In Mo Lee,et al.  Development for prediction system of TBM tunnel face ahead using probe drilling equipment and drilled hole imaging equipment , 2015 .

[2]  Hee-Hwan Ryu,et al.  Development of a tunnel electrical resistivity prospecting system and its application = 터널 전기비저항 탐사 시스템 개발 및 적용 , 2010 .

[3]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[4]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[5]  Jung-Ho Kim,et al.  Application of resistivity monitoring with tunnel excavation area , 2008 .

[6]  G. Kneib,et al.  Automatic seismic prediction ahead of the tunnel boring machine , 2000 .

[7]  Hyung-Joon Seo,et al.  A study on correlation between electrical resistivity obtained from electrical resistivity logging and rock mass rating in-situ tunnelling site , 2012 .

[8]  김영수,et al.  삼각분포를 사용한 Cost Risk 분석모델에 관한 연구 ( a study on the cost risk analysis model using the triangular distribution ) , 2000 .

[9]  R. Teale The concept of specific energy in rock drilling , 1965 .

[10]  Arnim Kaus,et al.  BEAM – Geoelectrical Ahead Monitoring for TBM‐Drives , 2008 .

[11]  Tien H. Wu,et al.  Uncertainties in Evaluation of Strength of Marine Sand , 1987 .

[12]  Cemal Balci,et al.  Prediction of the penetration rate of rotary blast hole drills using a new drillability index , 2000 .

[13]  이상호,et al.  A study on the estimation of rock mass classes using the information off a tunnel center line , 2004 .

[14]  R. E. Barlow The Bayesian approach in risk analysis , 1986 .