Effects of Issue Involvement and Framing of a Responsible Drinking Message on Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior

To decrease the prevalence and the amount of alcohol consumption among students, health messages advocating responsible alcohol behavior can be used. However, it is unclear whether responsible drinking messages are most effective when they use a gain frame, presenting the advantages of responsible drinking, or a loss frame, presenting the disadvantages of irresponsible drinking. This study tests the effects of framing and the moderating role of involvement with the issue of responsible drinking. A three-wave, between-subjects, experimental study was conducted, in which participants (N = 90) were exposed to either a gain- or loss-framed message about responsible drinking behavior at Wave 2. At all three waves, attitudes, intentions and behavior toward responsible drinking were measured. Results showed that for participants with low issue- involvement, a gain frame led to more positive attitudes and intentions toward responsible alcohol use, whereas a loss frame did not have any effects for them. For partic...

[1]  George A. Parks,et al.  Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  A. Duhachek,et al.  Guilt versus Shame: Coping, Fluency, and Framing in the Effectiveness of Responsible Drinking Messages , 2012 .

[3]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[4]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  John A Updegraff,et al.  Health Message Framing Effects on Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Meta-analytic Review , 2012, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[6]  J. Brug,et al.  The (Ir)Relevance of Framing Nutrition Education Messages , 2003, Nutrition and health.

[7]  M. Cullen,et al.  Effects of message framing and temporal context on college student drinking behavior , 2008 .

[8]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Detection Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[9]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2004. , 2003 .

[10]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Message Framing Outcomes When Systematic, Heuristic, or Both Types of Processing Occur , 2004 .

[11]  J. Baer.  Student factors: understanding individual variation in college drinking. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[12]  Elissa R Weitzman,et al.  Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. , 2009, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement.

[13]  J. Zaichkowsky.  Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[14]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  Do Loss-Framed Persuasive Messages Engender Greater Message Processing Than Do Gain-Framed Messages? A Meta-Analytic Review , 2008 .

[15]  Brian L Quick,et al.  The Use of Gain- or Loss-Frame Messages and Efficacy Appeals to Dissuade Excessive Alcohol Consumption Among College Students: A Test of Psychological Reactance Theory , 2010, Journal of health communication.

[16]  Inhyae Park,et al.  Constructing a Questionnaire on Male Workers' Sobriety Behavior: Based on Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior , 2010 .

[17]  F. Meijman,et al.  Consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs in university students in Belgium and the Netherlands: The role of living situation , 2010, International journal of adolescent medicine and health.

[18]  J. Villegas,et al.  The Effects of Message Framing, Involvement, and Nicotine Dependence on Anti-Smoking Public Service Announcements , 2011, Health marketing quarterly.

[19]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[21]  Philip Broemer.  Relative effectiveness of differently framed health messages: the influence of ambivalence , 2002 .

[22]  J. Covey.  The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. , 2014, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[23]  Jakob D. Jensen,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[24]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The Strategic Use of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages to Promote Healthy Behavior: How Theory Can Inform Practice , 2006 .

[25]  Emmanuel Kuntsche,et al.  Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives. , 2005, Clinical psychology review.

[26]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The Effectiveness of Gain-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behavior: Is All Hope Lost? , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[27]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .