The Cultural Adaptation of Prevention Interventions: Resolving Tensions Between Fidelity and Fit

A dynamic tension has developed in prevention science regarding two imperatives: (a) fidelity of implementation—the delivery of a manualized prevention intervention program as prescribed by the program developer, and (b) program adaptation—the modification of program content to accommodate the needs of a specific consumer group. This paper examines this complex programmatic issue from a community-based participatory research approach for program adaptation that emphasizes motivating community participation to enhance program outcomes. Several issues, key concepts, and implementation strategies are presented under a strategic approach to address issues of fidelity and adaptation. Despite the noted tension between fidelity and adaptation, both are essential elements of prevention intervention program design and they are best addressed by a planned, organized, and systematic approach. Towards this aim, an innovative program design strategy is to develop hybrid prevention programs that “build in” adaptation to enhance program fit while also maximizing fidelity of implementation and program effectiveness.

[1]  J. Eddy,et al.  Preventing Substance Use among Latino Youth , 2006 .

[2]  F. Castro,et al.  Social theory, social action, and intervention research: implications for cancer prevention among Latinos. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[3]  S. Ennett,et al.  Reasons for Teachers' Adaptation of Substance Use Prevention Curricula in Schools with Non-White Student Populations , 2004, Prevention Science.

[4]  Felipe González Castro,et al.  Integrating Cultural Variables into Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment with Racial/Ethnic Minorities , 2002 .

[5]  K. Geisinger.  Cross-Cultural Normative Assessment: Translation and Adaptation Issues Influencing the Normative Interpretation of Assessment Instruments. , 1994 .

[6]  Gary W. Peterson,et al.  Growing up in Appalachia: Ecological Influences on Adolescent Development , 2000 .

[7]  W. Vega,et al.  Lifetime prevalence of and risk factors for psychiatric disorders among Mexican migrant farmworkers in California. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[8]  K. Kumpfer,et al.  Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptation in Family-Based Prevention Interventions , 2002, Prevention Science.

[9]  A. Stewart,et al.  Translation and validation of arthritis outcome measures into Spanish. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  José Szapocznik,et al.  An ecodevelopmental framework for organizing the influences on drug abuse: A developmental model of risk and protection. , 1999 .

[11]  Meredith Minkler,et al.  Community-Based Participatory Research for Health , 2002 .

[12]  Ken Resnicow,et al.  Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention , 2000 .

[13]  Walter Ling,et al.  Dancing with strangers: will U.S. substance abuse practice and research organizations build mutually productive relationships? , 2002, Addictive behaviors.

[14]  Richard H. Dana,et al.  Understanding Cultural Identity in Intervention and Assessment , 1997 .

[15]  Marilyn M. Skaff,et al.  Lessons in cultural competence: Adapting research methodology for Latino participants , 2002 .

[16]  Felipe González Castro,et al.  10.05 – Cultural Competence Training in Clinical Psychology: Assessment, Clinical Intervention, and Research , 1998 .