Nonlinear optimization strategy based on multivariate prediction capability ratios: Analytical schemes and model validation for duplex stainless steel end milling

Abstract Given the complex nature of their phenomena and interactions, industrial processes often have multiple variables of interest, usually grouped into critical-to-quality and critical-to-performance characteristics. These variables often have significant correlations, which make engineering problems multivariate. For this reason, Response Surface Methodology, coupled with multivariate techniques, has been widely used as a logical roadmap for modeling and optimization of the characteristics of interest. However, the variability and prediction capability of the numerical solutions obtained are almost always neglected, reducing the likelihood that numerical results are indeed compatible with observable process improvements. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a nonlinear multiobjective optimization strategy based on multivariate prediction capability ratios. For this, rotated Factor Analysis is used as the multivariate technique for grouping process characteristics and composing capability ratios, so that the prediction variance is taken as the natural variability of the process modeled and the expected value distances to the nadir solutions of the latent variables are taken as the allowed variability. Normal Boundary Intersection method, combined with Generalized Reduced Gradient algorithm, is used as the numerical scheme to maximize the prediction capability of Pareto optimal solutions. To illustrate the feasibility of the proposed strategy, we present a case study of end milling without cutting fluids of duplex stainless steel UNS S32205. Rotatable Central Composite Design, with three cutting parameters, was employed for data collection. Traditional multivariate and proposed approaches were compared. The results demonstrate that the proposed optimization strategy is able to provide solutions with satisfactory prediction capability for all variables analyzed, regardless of their convexities, optimization directions, and correlation structure. In addition, while critical-to-quality characteristics are more difficult to control, they have been favored by the proposed optimization regarding prediction capability, which was a desirable result.

[1]  Gregory F. Piepel,et al.  Discussion of “Response surface design evaluation and comparison” by C.M. Anderson-Cook, C.M. Borror, and D.C. Montgomery , 2009 .

[2]  Lin Li,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of milling parameters – the trade-offs between energy, production rate and cutting quality , 2013 .

[3]  C. S. Sumesh,et al.  Numerical Modeling and Multi Objective Optimization of Face Milling of AISI 304 Steel , 2019 .

[4]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Robust parameter optimization based on multivariate normal boundary intersection , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Francisco Silva,et al.  Comparative study of PVD and CVD cutting tools performance in milling of duplex stainless steel , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[6]  Silvana M. B. Afonso,et al.  A modified NBI and NC method for the solution of N-multiobjective optimization problems , 2012 .

[7]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Optimization of combined time series methods to forecast the demand for coffee in Brazil: A new approach using Normal Boundary Intersection coupled with mixture designs of experiments and rotated factor scores , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[8]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 1986 .

[9]  Juntao Fang,et al.  Comparative study of response surface designs with errors-in-variables model , 2011 .

[10]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  GAUGE CAPABILITY AND DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS. PART I: BASIC METHODS , 1993 .

[11]  Francisco J. G. Silva,et al.  Machining GX2CrNiMoN26-7-4 DSS Alloy: Wear Analysis of TiAlN and TiCN/Al2O3/TiN Coated Carbide Tools Behavior in Rough End Milling Operations , 2019, Coatings.

[12]  Carmita Camposeco-Negrete,et al.  Sustainable machining as a mean of reducing the environmental impacts related to the energy consumption of the machine tool: a case study of AISI 1045 steel machining , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[13]  N. Radhika,et al.  Optimization of Cutting Parameters for MRR, Tool Wear and Surface Roughness Characteristics in Machining ADC12 Piston Alloy Using DOE , 2020, Tribology in Industry.

[14]  Li Li,et al.  Optimization of cutting parameters with a sustainable consideration of electrical energy and embodied energy of materials , 2018 .

[15]  Neelesh Kumar Jain,et al.  Analysis and optimization of micro-geometry of miniature spur gears manufactured by wire electric discharge machining , 2014 .

[16]  J. Dennis,et al.  A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems , 1997 .

[17]  João Roberto Ferreira,et al.  Robust optimisation of surface roughness of AISI H13 hardened steel in the finishing milling using ball nose end mills , 2019, Precision Engineering.

[18]  Lora S. Zimmer,et al.  Process Capability Indices in Theory and Practice , 2000, Technometrics.

[19]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces , 1957 .

[20]  Juan Ignacio Arribas,et al.  A visible-range computer-vision system for automated, non-intrusive assessment of the pH value in Thomson oranges , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[21]  A. C. Rencher Methods of multivariate analysis , 1995 .

[22]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Response surface methodology for advanced manufacturing technology optimization: theoretical fundamentals, practical guidelines, and survey literature review , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[23]  M. Ghobakhloo,et al.  Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability , 2020 .

[24]  Michael Quinten A Practical Guide to Surface Metrology , 2019 .

[25]  Jos J. A. M. Weusten,et al.  Process capability in industry: Setting preliminary statistical specification limits , 2017 .

[26]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  A normal boundary intersection with multivariate mean square error approach for dry end milling process optimization of the AISI 1045 steel , 2016 .

[27]  Enrique Del Castillo,et al.  Process Optimization: A Statistical Approach , 2007 .

[28]  Tarek Mabrouki,et al.  Modeling and optimization in dry face milling of X2CrNi18-9 austenitic stainless steel using RMS and desirability approach , 2017 .

[29]  Neelesh Kumar Jain,et al.  Analysis and multi-response optimization of gear quality and surface finish of meso-sized helical and bevel gears manufactured by WSEM process , 2019, Precision Engineering.

[30]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Multivariate robust modeling and optimization of cutting forces of the helical milling process of the aluminum alloy Al 7075 , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[31]  C. R. Deepak,et al.  Weldability, machinability and surfacing of commercial duplex stainless steel AISI2205 for marine applications – A recent review , 2017, Journal of advanced research.

[32]  Pardeep Saini,et al.  Multi-response Optimization using TGRA for End Milling of AISI H11 Steel Alloy Using Carbide End Mill , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[33]  Shey-Huei Sheu,et al.  Process capability monitoring chart with an application in the silicon-filler manufacturing process , 2006 .

[34]  Guan Gong,et al.  Enhancing tensile strength of injection molded fiber reinforced composites using the Taguchi-based six sigma approach , 2017 .

[35]  J. Borkowski Spherical prediction-variance properties of central composite and Box-Behnken designs , 1995 .

[36]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Graphical assessment of the prediction capability of response surface designs , 1989 .

[37]  Li Li,et al.  Experimental investigation of cutting force, surface roughness and tool wear in high-speed dry milling of AISI 4340 steel , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology.

[38]  Ali Akbar Entezami,et al.  Modeling and optimization of mechanical behavior of bonded composite–steel single lap joints by response surface methodology , 2014 .

[39]  Indraneel Das On characterizing the “knee” of the Pareto curve based on Normal-Boundary Intersection , 1999 .

[40]  G. Box,et al.  Response Surfaces, Mixtures and Ridge Analyses , 2007 .

[41]  Jianfeng Li,et al.  Characterizing the effect of process variables on energy consumption in end milling , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[42]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  A new multivariate gage R&R method for correlated characteristics , 2013 .

[43]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: A Retrospective and Literature Survey , 2004 .

[44]  Hengameh Hadian,et al.  Multivariate statistical control chart and process capability indices for simultaneous monitoring of project duration and cost , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[45]  Fabrício Alves de Almeida,et al.  A multiobjective optimization model for machining quality in the AISI 12L14 steel turning process using fuzzy multivariate mean square error , 2019, Precision Engineering.

[46]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[47]  Catalin Iulian Pruncu,et al.  Multi-Response Optimization of Face Milling Performance Considering Tool Path Strategies in Machining of Al-2024 , 2019, Materials.

[48]  Nagayoshi Kasashima,et al.  Prediction of surface roughness in CNC turning by model-assisted response surface method , 2020 .

[49]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Prediction capability of Pareto optimal solutions: A multi-criteria optimization strategy based on model capability ratios , 2019 .

[50]  P. Sathiya,et al.  Multi-objective Optimization of Continuous Drive Friction Welding Process Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology with Intelligent Optimization Algorithm , 2015 .

[51]  H. Kaiser The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[52]  Steven G. Gilmour,et al.  Comparisons of augmented pairs designs and subset designs , 2018, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[53]  Stephen C. Veldhuis,et al.  Investigation of Coated Cutting Tool Performance during Machining of Super Duplex Stainless Steels through 3D Wear Evaluations , 2017 .

[54]  Vitor F. C. Sousa,et al.  Recent Advances on Coated Milling Tool Technology—A Comprehensive Review , 2020, Coatings.

[55]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[56]  Francisco J. G. Silva,et al.  Machining Duplex Stainless Steel: Comparative Study Regarding End Mill Coated Tools , 2016 .

[57]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Evaluating economic feasibility and maximization of social welfare of photovoltaic projects developed for the Brazilian northeastern coast: An attribute agreement analysis , 2020 .

[58]  N. Bratchell,et al.  Multivariate response surface modelling by principal components analysis , 1989 .

[59]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[60]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Robust weighting applied to optimization of AISI H13 hardened-steel turning process with ceramic wiper tool: A diversity-based approach , 2017 .

[61]  Ibrahim Kucukkoc,et al.  Type-E parallel two-sided assembly line balancing problem: Mathematical model and ant colony optimisation based approach with optimised parameters , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[62]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Response surface design evaluation and comparison , 2009 .

[63]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  A multivariate mean square error optimization of AISI 52100 hardened steel turning , 2009 .

[64]  R. Marler,et al.  The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights , 2010 .

[65]  Rafael Garcia,et al.  Surface roughness analysis in finishing end-milling of duplex stainless steel UNS S32205 , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[66]  M. Elbah,et al.  Performance comparison of wiper and conventional ceramic inserts in hard turning of AISI 4140 steel: analysis of machining forces and flank wear , 2016 .

[67]  Nanda Naik Korra,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of activated tungsten inert gas welding of duplex stainless steel using response surface methodology , 2015 .

[68]  Xiaobin Cui,et al.  Optimization of cutting conditions in hard milling with the performance of cemented carbide tool material considered , 2018 .

[69]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Multivariate Normal Boundary Intersection based on rotated factor scores: A multiobjective optimization method for methyl orange treatment , 2017 .

[70]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .