The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning

Literal meaning has been defined as linguistic meaning, i.e., as nonfigurative, coded, fully compositional, context-invariant, explicit, and truth conditional (Katz, Jerrold J., 1977. Propositional structure and illocutionary force. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell). Nonliteral meaning is seen as its counterpart, i.e., as extralinguistic, figurative, indirect, inferred, noncompositional, context-dependent, and cancelable. I argue that the requirements made on literal meaning conflict with each other (e.g., coded vs. truth condtional; figurative vs. coded; inferred vs. literal). I then propose to replace the one concept of literal meaning with three concepts of minimal meanings. Each, I argue, reflects a different respect in which a meaning can be minimal. A meaning can be minimal because it is coded, compositional, and contextinvariant—the linguistic meaning. A meaning can be minimal because psycholinguistically it is the one foremost on our mind—Giora’s (Giora, Rachel, 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 183–206.) salient meaning. And a meaning can be minimal because it is the privileged interactional interpretation communicated, namely what the speaker is seen as bound by, what constitutes her relevant contribution to the discourse (Ariel, Mira, 2002. Privileged interactional interpretations. Journal of Pragmatics, in press). # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Stanley A. Rice,et al.  Polysemy and lexical representation: The case of three English prepositions , 1992 .

[2]  D. Sperber,et al.  Linguistic form and relevance , 1993 .

[3]  J. L. Morgan,et al.  Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts. Technical Report No. 52. , 1977 .

[4]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics , 1998 .

[5]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[6]  J. Katz.  The philosophy of language , 1967 .

[7]  Deirdre Wilson,et al.  Is there a maxim of truthfulness ? , 1995 .

[8]  John R. Searle,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Jay David Atlas,et al.  Negation, ambiguity, and presupposition , 1977 .

[10]  N. Cocchiarella,et al.  Situations and Attitudes. , 1986 .

[11]  Jonathan Berg,et al.  Is semantics still possible , 2002 .

[12]  R. Giora.  Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[13]  G. Fauconnier.  Mappings in thought and language , 1997 .

[14]  Kent Bach.  Thought and Reference , 1987 .

[15]  H. Grice.  Further Notes on Logic and Conversation , 1978 .

[16]  Kent Bach,et al.  The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters , 1997 .

[17]  Frederick Bowers,et al.  Linguistic Aspects of Legislative Expression , 1989 .

[18]  Nat Hansen,et al.  Literal Meaning: Introduction , 2003 .

[19]  Ofer Fein,et al.  Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. , 1998 .

[20]  M. Pickering,et al.  Obtaining a Figurative Interpretation of a Word: Support for Underspecification , 2001 .

[21]  Robyn Carston.  Quantity maxims and generalised implicature , 1995 .

[22]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Obtaining a Figurative Interpretation of a Word: Support for Underspecification , 2001 .

[23]  F. Récanati.  The Pragmatics of What is Said , 1989 .

[24]  Ernesto Napoli.  (Direct) reference , 1995, J. Philos. Log..

[25]  J. Searle.  The Background of Meaning , 1980 .

[26]  Eve Sweetser.  From Etymology To Pragmatics , 1990 .

[27]  Marcelo Dascal,et al.  On the Roles of Context and Literal Meaning in Understanding , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  P. Matthews.  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics , 1998 .

[29]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .

[30]  Literally speaking , 2002 .

[31]  François Récanati,et al.  The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  B. Bix.  Analyzing Law: New Essays in Legal Theory , 1998 .

[33]  Rachel Giora,et al.  On the informativeness requirement , 1988 .

[34]  J. Aitchinson.  The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  Marcelo Dascal,et al.  Defending Literal Meaning , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  D Wilson,et al.  Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force , 1979 .

[37]  S. Glucksberg.  Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality. , 1990 .

[38]  R. Jackendoff.  On Katz's Autonomous Semantics , 1981 .

[39]  R. Giora.  Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? , 2002 .

[40]  Oswald Ducrot,et al.  Les échelles argumentatives , 1980 .

[41]  J. Berg.  Literal meaning and context , 1993 .

[42]  Ofer Fein,et al.  Irony: Context and Salience , 1999 .

[43]  R. Giora,et al.  Irony comprehension: The graded salience hypothesis , 1999 .

[44]  C. Hookway.  Thought and Reference , 1989 .

[45]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[46]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation , 2001 .

[47]  D. Davidson.  Truth and Meaning , 1967 .

[48]  Robyn Carston,et al.  The semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from Relevance Theory , 1998 .

[49]  D. Sperber,et al.  On Grice's Theory of Conversation , 1981 .

[50]  Asa Kasher,et al.  On the pragmatic modules: A lecture , 1991 .

[51]  Jerrold M. Sadock.  Metaphor and Thought: Figurative speech and linguistics , 1993 .

[52]  T. Brown.  Metaphor and Thought , 1981 .

[53]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Conventional Implicature. Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition , 1981 .

[54]  Mira Ariel.  Privileged interactional interpretations , 2002 .

[55]  J. Mahon.  The Poetics of Mind , 1996 .

[56]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[57]  John N. Williams.  Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence for interrelated meanings , 1992 .

[58]  A. Avramides.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[59]  S. Tsohatzidis.  Foundations of speech act theory : philosophical and linguistic perspectives , 1994 .

[60]  K. Bach,et al.  Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts , 1983 .

[61]  Robert J. Stainton,et al.  Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis , 1997 .

[62]  F. Hundsnurscher,et al.  The Myth of Literal Meaning , 1996 .

[63]  Marjolein Groefsema,et al.  Understood arguments: a semantic/pragmatic approach , 1995 .

[64]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[65]  R. GibbsJr..  Literal meaning and psychological theory , 1984 .

[66]  Palle Yourgrau.  A Companion to the Philosophy of Language , 1999 .

[67]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Competition and Lexical Categorization , 1987 .

[68]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Understanding and Literal Meaning , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[69]  George Lakoff,et al.  The Meanings of Literal , 1986 .

[70]  Orna Peleg,et al.  Salience and Context Effects: Two Are Better Than One , 2001 .

[71]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora , 1986 .

[72]  Michael Darnell.  Functionalism and formalism in linguistics , 1999 .

[73]  D. Sandra,et al.  Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind—the linguist’s or the language user’s? , 1995 .

[74]  R. Gibbs.  A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated , 2002 .

[75]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  28. The pragmatics of indirect anaphors , 1987 .

[76]  B. Heine,et al.  Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework , 1991 .

[77]  Christopher J. Lee.  Some hypotheses concerning the evolution of polysemous words , 1990 .

[78]  J. Fodor.  Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind , 1988 .

[79]  R. Giora.  On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language , 2003 .

[80]  P. Werth.  Conversation and Discourse , 2022 .

[81]  Jerrold J. Katz,et al.  Chomsky on Meaning , 1980 .

[82]  Michael Don Palmer,et al.  Reflections on language , 1977 .

[83]  John Llewelyn.  MEANING, REFERENCE AND NECESSITY: New Studies in Semantics , 1976 .

[84]  R. Giora,et al.  On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language☆ , 1999 .

[85]  Charles Travis.  Annals of Analysis , 1991 .

[86]  Begoña Vicente.  What pragmatics can tell us about (literal) meaning: A critical note on Bach's theory of impliciture , 2002 .

[87]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[88]  R. Carston.  Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistisc , 1997 .

[89]  James Higginbotham,et al.  Priorities in the Philosophy of Thought , 1994 .

[90]  R. Gibbs.  Speakers' intuitions and pragmatic theory. , 1999, Cognition.

[91]  E. Doerr,et al.  General Semantics. , 1958, Science.

[92]  Deirdre Wilson,et al.  Presuppositions And Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics , 1975 .

[93]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability , 1977 .

[94]  I. Noveck.  When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[95]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[96]  Rachel Giora,et al.  On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language , 1999 .

[97]  Nicholas Asher.  Discourse Structure and the Logic of Conversation , 2000 .

[98]  D. Rumelhart.  Metaphor and Thought: Some problems with the notion of literal meanings , 1993 .

[99]  B. Clark,et al.  Experimental pragmatics and what is said: a response to Gibbs and Moise. , 1999, Cognition.

[100]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication , 2002 .

[101]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Pragmatics in understanding what is said , 1997, Cognition.

[102]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  English verb classes and alternations , 1993 .

[103]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .

[104]  H. H. Clark.  Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[105]  J. Katz,et al.  Propositional Structure And Illocutionary Force , 1977 .

[106]  D. Sperber,et al.  Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction , 1981 .

[107]  W. T. Farrar,et al.  Literal meaning and figurative language , 1993 .

[108]  A. Bezuidenhout,et al.  Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing , 2002 .

[109]  Steven Davis.  Pragmatics : a reader , 1991 .

[110]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[111]  J. Searle,et al.  Speech act theory and pragmatics , 1980 .

[112]  Ken Turner,et al.  The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view , 1999 .

[113]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .