Multiperson Decision Making: A Selective Review
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Trick,et al. The computational difficulty of manipulating an election , 1989 .
[2] James M. Enelow,et al. A general probabilistic spatial theory of elections , 1989 .
[3] M. Trick,et al. Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election , 1989 .
[4] Undominated candidate strategies under alternative voting rules , 1989 .
[5] T. Tideman,et al. Complete independence of clones in the ranked pairs rule , 1989 .
[6] Stephen Wright,et al. Plurality and runoff systems and numbers of candidates , 1989 .
[7] Ron Holzman,et al. To vote or not to vote: What is the quota? , 1989, Discret. Appl. Math..
[8] Kenneth C. Williams,et al. The rationally uninformed electorate: Some experimental evidence , 1989 .
[9] R. McAfee,et al. Multidimensional incentive compatibility and mechanism design , 1988 .
[10] H. Young. Condorcet's Theory of Voting , 1988, American Political Science Review.
[11] Jerry S. Kelly. 5. Computational complexity , 1988 .
[12] Murat R. Sertel,et al. Characterizing approval voting , 1988 .
[13] H. Moulin. Condorcet's principle implies the no show paradox , 1988 .
[14] S. Reiter,et al. Game forms with minimal message spaces , 1988 .
[15] M. Sertel. A non-dictatorial compromise , 1988 .
[16] Jeffrey S. Banks,et al. Voting games, indifference, and consistent sequential choice rules , 1988 .
[17] Bhaskar Dutta. Covering sets and a new condorcet choice correspondence , 1988 .
[18] P. Fishburn,et al. Does Approval Voting Elect the Lowest Common Denominator? , 1988, PS: Political Science & Politics.
[19] J. Kelly. Social choice and computational complexity , 1988 .
[20] D. Marc Kilgour,et al. The geometry of the uncovered set in the three-voter spatial model , 1987 .
[21] T. Tideman,et al. Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules , 1987 .
[22] Scott L. Feld,et al. The uncovered set in spatial voting games , 1987 .
[23] H. Gottinger. Choice and complexity , 1987 .
[24] Bhaskan Dutta,et al. Fuzzy preferences and social choice , 1987 .
[25] D. Saari. The Source of Some Paradoxes from Social Choice and Probability , 1987 .
[26] An extension of Black's theorem on voting orders to the successive procedure , 1987 .
[27] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Interprofile Conditions And Impossibility , 1987 .
[28] H. Nurmi. Comparing Voting Systems , 1987 .
[29] Richard D. McKelvey,et al. Covering, Dominance, and Institution Free Properties of Social Choice , 1986 .
[30] Depankar Ray,et al. On the practical possibility of a ‘no show paradox’ under the single transferable vote , 1986 .
[31] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Empirical comparisons of voting procedures , 1986 .
[32] P. Pattanaik,et al. Exact choice and fuzzy preferences , 1986 .
[33] A. A. Lewis,et al. On effectively computable realizations of choice functions : Dedicated to Professors Kenneth J. Arrow and Anil Nerode , 1985 .
[34] Dominique Henriet,et al. The Copeland choice function an axiomatic characterization , 1985 .
[35] P. Fishburn. Probabilistic Social Choice Based on Simple Voting Comparisons , 1984 .
[36] Donald G. Saari,et al. The ultimate of chaos resulting from weighted voting systems , 1984 .
[37] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Discrete Mathematics in Voting and Group Choice , 1984 .
[38] J. Banks. Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control , 1984 .
[39] Barry R. Weingast,et al. Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions , 1984 .
[40] Clyde H. Coombs,et al. An Empirical Study of Some Election Systems , 1984 .
[41] P. Fishburn,et al. Manipulability of voting by sincere truncation of preferences , 1984 .
[42] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Dimensions of election procedures: Analyses and comparisons , 1983 .
[43] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Paradoxes of Preferential Voting , 1983 .
[44] Robert A. Pollak,et al. Rational Collective Choice , 1983 .
[45] Nicholas R. Miller. The Covering Relation in Tournaments: Two Corrections , 1983 .
[46] W. Gehrlein. Condorcet's paradox , 1983 .
[47] Peter C. Fishburn. A new characterization of simple majority , 1983 .
[48] Donald G. Saari,et al. Inconsistencies of Weighted Summation Voting Systems , 1982, Math. Oper. Res..
[49] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Majority efficiencies for simple voting procedures: Summary and interpretation , 1982 .
[50] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Monotonicity paradoxes in the theory of elections , 1982, Discret. Appl. Math..
[51] Charles R. Plott,et al. Nonbinary Social Choice: An Impossibility Theorem , 1982 .
[52] Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al. Optimal pairs of score vectors for positional scoring rules , 1982 .
[53] William V. Gehrlein,et al. Scoring rule and majority agreements for large electorates with arbitrary preferences , 1982, Math. Soc. Sci..
[54] H. Nurmi. Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations , 1981 .
[55] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Inverted orders for monotone scoring rules , 1981, Discret. Appl. Math..
[56] Ariel Rubinstein,et al. A further characterization of Borda ranking method , 1981 .
[57] D. Granberg,et al. Perceptions of Issue Positions of Presidential Candidates , 1980 .
[58] Nicholas R. Miller. A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting: Further Graph- Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting , 1980 .
[59] John H. Aldrich. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Campaigns , 1980 .
[60] H. Moulin. Dominance Solvable Voting Schemes , 1979 .
[61] Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften,et al. Decision Theory and Social Ethics Issues in Social Choice , 1979 .
[62] Gideon Doron,et al. He Hare Voting System is Inconsistent , 1979 .
[63] T. Groves,et al. Efficient Collective Choice when Compensation is Possible , 1979 .
[64] E. Maskin,et al. The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some General Results on Incentive Compatibility , 1979 .
[65] Samuel Merrill,et al. Approval Voting: A ‘Best Buy’ Method for Multi-candidate Elections? , 1979 .
[66] Robert A. Pollak,et al. Bergson-Samuelson Social Welfare Functions and the Theory of Social Choice , 1979 .
[67] J. Laffont. Aggregation and revelation of preferences , 1979 .
[68] Jeffrey T. Richelson,et al. A comparative-analysis of social choice functions, I, II, III: A summary , 1979 .
[69] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Proportions of profiles with a majority candidate , 1979 .
[70] M. Garey. Johnson: computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of np- completeness (freeman , 1979 .
[71] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Probabilities of election outcomes for large electorates , 1978 .
[72] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Axioms for approval voting: Direct proof , 1978 .
[73] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules , 1978 .
[74] H. Young,et al. A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle , 1978 .
[75] Salvador Barberà,et al. Preference aggregation with randomized social orderings , 1978 .
[76] J. Kelly. Arrow Impossibility Theorems , 1978 .
[77] C. Plott,et al. A Model of Agenda Influence on Committee Decisions , 1978 .
[78] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Acceptable Social Choice Lotteries , 1978 .
[79] J. Richelson. A comparative analysis of social choice functions, IV , 1978 .
[80] Bhaskar Dutta,et al. Strategy and group choice , 1978 .
[81] David S. Johnson,et al. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .
[82] H. Young. Extending Condorcet's rule , 1977 .
[83] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Towards a Theory of Elections with Probabilistic Preferences , 1977 .
[84] P. Fishburn. Condorcet Social Choice Functions , 1977 .
[85] John Kellett,et al. Presidential Primaries: Measuring Popular Choice , 1977, Polity.
[86] Gideon Doron,et al. Single Transferrable Vote: An Example of a Perverse Social Choice Function , 1977 .
[87] A. Sen,et al. Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination , 1977 .
[88] W. Riker,et al. The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's Law , 1976 .
[89] Robert P. Parks,et al. An Impossibility Theorem for Fixed Preferences: A Dictatorial Bergson-Samuelson Welfare Function , 1976 .
[90] Bengt Hansson,et al. A proof technique for social choice with variable electorate , 1976 .
[91] P. Gärdenfors. Manipulation of social choice functions , 1976 .
[92] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. The probability of the paradox of voting: A computable solution , 1976 .
[93] Charles R. Plott,et al. Axiomatic Social Choice Theory: An Overview and Interpretation , 1976 .
[94] R. Niemi,et al. The Choice of Voting Systems , 1976 .
[95] Joseph L. Bernd,et al. Mathematical applications in political science , 1976 .
[96] Dennis C. Mueller,et al. Public Choice: A Survey , 1976 .
[97] H. Young. Social Choice Scoring Functions , 1975 .
[98] M. Satterthwaite. Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .
[99] J. Ferejohn,et al. Purposive Models of Legislative Behavior , 1975 .
[100] H. P. Young,et al. An axiomatization of Borda's rule , 1974 .
[101] P. Fishburn. Paradoxes of Voting , 1974, American Political Science Review.
[102] Steven J. Brams,et al. The 3/2's Rule in Presidential Campaigning , 1974, American Political Science Review.
[103] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. On the sum-of-ranks winner when losers are removed , 1974, Discret. Math..
[104] J. H. Smith. AGGREGATION OF PREFERENCES WITH VARIABLE ELECTORATE , 1973 .
[105] Michael D. Intriligator,et al. A Probabilistic Model of Social Choice , 1973 .
[106] A. Gibbard. Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .
[107] P. Fishburn. The Theory Of Social Choice , 1973 .
[108] T. Schwartz. Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum , 1972 .
[109] Andreu Mas-Colell,et al. General Possibility Theorems for Group Decisions , 1972 .
[110] A. Sen,et al. Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .
[111] R. Niemi. The occurrence of the paradox of voting in University elections , 1970 .
[112] Michael J. Shapiro. Rational Political Man: A Synthesis of Economic and Social-Psychological Perspectives , 1969, American Political Science Review.
[113] Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al. Majority Rule with Lotteries on Alternatives , 1969 .
[114] J. Harsanyi. Rational-Choice Models of Political Behavior vs. Functionalist and Conformist Theories , 1969, World Politics.
[115] Robin Farquharson,et al. Theory of voting , 1969 .
[116] Rudolf Wildenmann. Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch für Politik , 1969 .
[117] M. Kamien,et al. The paradox of voting: probability calculations. , 1968, Behavioral science.
[118] R. Niemi,et al. A mathematical solution for the probability of the paradox of voting. , 1968, Behavioral science.
[119] Y. Murakami. Logic and Social Choice , 1968 .
[120] D. Hill,et al. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws , 1969 .
[121] William H. Flanigan,et al. The Theory of Political Coalitions. , 1965 .
[122] W. Riker. Voting and the Summation of Preferences: An interpretive Bibliographical Review of Selected Developments During the Last Decade , 1961, American Political Science Review.
[123] P. Slater. Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons , 1961 .
[124] Angus Campbell,et al. The American voter , 1960 .
[125] G. Thompson,et al. The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .
[126] W. Riker,et al. The Paradox of Voting and Congressional Rules for Voting on Amendments , 1958, American Political Science Review.
[127] A. Downs. An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .
[128] Kenneth O. May,et al. A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision , 1952 .
[129] L. A. Goodman,et al. Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .
[130] K. Arrow. A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.
[131] D. Black. On the Rationale of Group Decision-making , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.
[132] J. C. Meredith. Proportional Representation in Ireland , 1920, American Political Science Review.
[133] Great Britain. Foreign Office.. Report of the royal commission appointed to enquire into electoral systems with appendices , 1910 .
[134] F. Galton. One Vote, One Value , 1907, Nature.
[135] P.-C.-F. Daunou,et al. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin , 1803 .