The usefulness of net-centric support tools for traffic incident management

In the last two decades traffic Incident Management (IM) has become an important tool to reduce and prevent congestion on the road network, especially in urban areas. IM involves the coordinated interactions of many public and private actors. To support their tasks in an effective way, information systems are becoming increasingly important. In particular, information and system quality and Situational Awareness (SA) have been identified as major hurdles for effective emergency response. This paper reports the results of an empirical analysis of the effectiveness of net-centric information systems to improve the cooperation between public and private IM organizations. A set of controlled experiments were conducted with 16 participants. Data on the responses of the participants were collected through questionnaires and observer notes. The analysis focused on: a comparison of the tools tested, in terms of the appreciation of information and system quality, a comparison of the communication and coordination of a test group and a control group of the emergency workers; the value of SA in the performance of the decision-making process; and, how scenario complexity can affect the design principles of net-centric systems.

[1]  Christopher Cooper,et al.  Disaster: Hurricane Katrina and the Failure of Homeland Security , 2006 .

[2]  Jason Scholz,et al.  A Dialectic for Network Centric Warfare , 2005 .

[3]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  There is more to context than location , 1999, Comput. Graph..

[4]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Traffic incident and crisis management : challenges and obstacles in information sharing , 2012 .

[5]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Jungwoo Ryoo,et al.  A comparison and classification framework for disaster information management systems , 2006 .

[8]  John Piggott,et al.  Situational awareness and safety , 2001 .

[9]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[10]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Gary Wills,et al.  An evaluation of Information quality frameworks for the World Wide Web , 2006 .

[12]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Traffic Incident Management: A Common Operational Picture to Support Situational Awareness of Sustainable Mobility , 2012 .

[14]  James R. Evans,et al.  The management and control of quality , 1989 .

[15]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Identifying and confirming information and system quality requirements for multi-agency disaster management , 2009 .

[16]  Ben Immers,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF INCIDENT MANAGEMENT PROJECTS IN THE NETHERLANDS , 1998 .

[17]  M R Endsley,et al.  Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001 , 2006 .

[19]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[20]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[21]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[22]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  How do SMEs learn in a systems-of-innovation context? The role of sources of innovation and absorptive capacity on the innovation performance of Dutch SMEs , 2013 .

[24]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  Problematical aspects of the information/ communication revolution for disaster planning and research: ten non‐technical issues and questions , 1997 .

[25]  Dale Lambert Grand challenges of information fusion , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[26]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Situation Awareness and the Cognitive Management of Complex Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  ONE FIGHT, ONE TEAM: THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT ON INTELLIGENCE, FRAGMENTATION AND INFORMATION , 2006 .

[28]  Henk J. Scholten,et al.  From Spatial Data to Synchronised Actions: The Network-centric Organisation of Spatial Decision Support for Risk and Emergency Management , 2011 .

[29]  Walter L. Perry,et al.  EXPLORING INFORMATION SUPERIORITY A Methodology for Measuring the Quality of Information and Its Impact on Shared Awareness , 2004 .

[30]  Rohan Samarajiva,et al.  Mobilizing Information and Communications Technologies for Effective Disaster Warning: Lessons from the 2004 Tsunami , 2005 .

[31]  Mouzhi Ge,et al.  Analysing the effect of security on information quality dimensions , 2009, ECIS.

[32]  Thomas A. Horan,et al.  Time-critical information services , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[33]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[34]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[35]  Craig W. Fisher,et al.  Criticality of data quality as exemplified in two disasters , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Steven Wark,et al.  Presenting the Story Behind the Data: Enhancing Situational Awareness using Multimedia Narrative , 2007, MILCOM 2007 - IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[38]  I. R. Wilmink,et al.  DERIVING INCIDENT MANAGEMENT MEASURES USING INCIDENT PROBABILITY MODELS AND SIMULATION , 1996 .

[39]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Situation Awareness , 2006 .

[40]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Analysis of Situation Awareness from Critical Incident Reports , 2000 .

[41]  Edward G. Schilling,et al.  Juran's Quality Handbook , 1998 .

[42]  Holmes Miller,et al.  The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[43]  Insu Park,et al.  Information Sharing: A Study of Information Attributes and their Relative Significance During Catastrophic Events , 2009 .

[44]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Completeness versus Consistency Tradeoffs in Information Decision Contexts , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[45]  Min Xie,et al.  Factor analysis of service quality dimension shifts in the information age , 2003 .

[46]  John R. Harrald,et al.  Shared Situational Awareness in Emergency Management Mitigation and Response , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[47]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  A framework for information overload research in organizations , 2003 .

[48]  E. C. Adam,et al.  Fighter cockpits of the future , 1993, [1993 Proceedings] AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[49]  Henk J. Scholten,et al.  Spatial Data Infrastructure for Emergency Response in Netherlands , 2008 .

[50]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Urban traffic incident management in a digital society. An actor-network approach in information technology use in urban Europe , 2014 .

[51]  C. McDaniel,et al.  Contemporary Marketing Research , 1991 .

[52]  Richard W Pew The State of Situation Awareness Measurement: Heading Toward the Next Century , 2017 .

[53]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[54]  Henk J. Scholten,et al.  The role of Geo-ICT and Spatial Approaches in Science , 2009 .

[55]  Vikas Singh,et al.  National Incident Management System , 2007 .

[56]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[57]  Neville Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[58]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[59]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Group value and intention to use - A study of multi-agency disaster management information systems for public safety , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[60]  M. Turoff,et al.  Session details: Emergency response information systems: emerging trends and technologies , 2007 .

[61]  D. A. Lambert Situations for situation awareness , 2001 .

[62]  G. Bedny,et al.  Theory of Activity and Situation Awareness , 1999 .

[63]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Road Incidents and Network Dynamics: Effects on driving behaviour and traffic congestion , 2009 .

[64]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness and Workload in Aviation , 2002 .