Improved non-local self-similarity measures for effective speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE In the observed medical ultrasound image, there is always some speckle noise which suppress the details of images and impairs the value of ultrasonography in diagnosis. This work present a novel despeckling method which effectively exploit non-local self-similarity for restoration of corrupted ultrasound images. The proposed approach consist of three stages. First, an improved optimized Bayesian non-local means (OBNLM) filter in which pixel patch is represented by a new vector form is used to get an preliminary estimation of noise-free image. Then, a new index called redundancy index of each pixel patch is calculated for determining which areas in image have low redundancy. Finally, another new vector form is used to represent pixel patch in areas with low redundancy obtained in second stage to recalculate filtered output, and the recalculated output is superimposed on preliminary estimation to generate final result of proposed method. METHODS The performance of proposed approach is evaluated on simulated and real ultrasound images. The experiments conducted on various test image illustrate that our proposed algorithm outperforms the various classic denoising algorithms included block matching 3-D (BM3D) and optimized Bayesian non-local means filter. RESULTS The objective evaluations and subjective visual inspection of denoised simulated and real ultrasound images demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can achieve superior performance than previously developed methods for speckle noise suppression. CONCLUSIONS The combined use of two new representations improve denoising and edge preserving capability of proposed filter apparently. The success of proposed algorithm would help in building the lay foundation for inventing the despeckling algorithms that can make fuller use of information in images.

[1]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Context-based entropy coding of block transform coefficients for image compression , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  O. V. von Ramm,et al.  Frequency compounding for speckle contrast reduction in phased array images. , 1982, Ultrasonic imaging.

[3]  Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas,et al.  Ultrasound Image Despeckling Using Stochastic Distance-Based BM3D , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[5]  Sudhish N. George,et al.  Ultrasound image despeckling using low rank matrix approximation approach , 2017, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[6]  Jonathan Li,et al.  SAR Image Denoising via Clustering-Based Principal Component Analysis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Probabilistic-Driven Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion with Application to Cardiac Ultrasonic Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[8]  Ajay Gupta,et al.  Speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images using an unbiased non-local means method , 2016, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[9]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Giacomo Boracchi,et al.  Foveated Nonlocal Self-Similarity , 2016, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  A. Fenster,et al.  3-D ultrasound imaging: a review , 1996 .

[12]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Bayesian Non-local Means Filter, Image Redundancy and Adaptive Dictionaries for Noise Removal , 2007, SSVM.

[13]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Jian Sun,et al.  Guided Image Filtering , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Noise Smoothing Filter for Images with Signal-Dependent Noise , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Y. Wang,et al.  Speckle filtering of ultrasonic images using a modified non local-based algorithm , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[17]  Zvi Friedman,et al.  A new method of spatial compounding imaging. , 2003, Ultrasonics.

[18]  Prerna Singh,et al.  Synthetic models of ultrasound image formation for speckle noise simulation and analysis , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Signals and Systems (ICSigSys).

[19]  Chandan Singh,et al.  A hybrid algorithm for speckle noise reduction of ultrasound images , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[20]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Tong Fang,et al.  Ultrasound-Specific Segmentation via Decorrelation and Statistical Region-Based Active Contours , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[23]  Charles Perreault,et al.  Speckle Simulation Based on B-Mode Echographic Image Acquisition Model , 2007, Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV '07).

[24]  Fabio Baselice Ultrasound Image Despeckling Based on Statistical Similarity. , 2017, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Ming Yang,et al.  Image Blind Denoising with Generative Adversarial Network Based Noise Modeling , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[26]  Chen Wang,et al.  Comparison of Despeckle Filters for Breast Ultrasound Images , 2015, Circuits Syst. Signal Process..

[27]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive restoration of images with speckle , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[28]  Lahcène Mitiche,et al.  Medical image denoising using dual tree complex thresholding wavelet transform and Wiener filter , 2015, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci..

[29]  T. Loupas,et al.  An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images , 1989 .

[30]  Alexandre Jouan,et al.  Speckle filtering of SAR images: a comparative study between complex-wavelet-based and standard filters , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[31]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Non-local sparse models for image restoration , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[32]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[33]  Zong-Guo Xia,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of filters for radar speckle suppression , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[34]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[35]  Hemant D. Tagare,et al.  Evaluation of Four Probability Distribution Models for Speckle in Clinical Cardiac Ultrasound Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Charles-Alban Deledalle,et al.  Non-local Methods with Shape-Adaptive Patches (NLM-SAP) , 2012, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[37]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[39]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[40]  Danni Ai,et al.  Local statistics and non-local mean filter for speckle noise reduction in medical ultrasound image , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[41]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[42]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of abdominal tissues via digital analysis of backscattered waveforms. , 1981, Radiology.

[43]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[44]  S. D. Silverstein,et al.  Optimum displacement for compound image generation in medical ultrasound , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[45]  Ganapathi Subramanian,et al.  Adaptive wavelet packet-based de-speckling of ultrasound images with bilateral filter. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[46]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  On the estimation of the coefficient of variation for anisotropic diffusion speckle filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[47]  Olaf T. von Ramm,et al.  Compound Scanning with a Phased Array , 1982 .

[48]  Ivan W. Selesnick,et al.  Enhanced Low-Rank Matrix Approximation , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[49]  Bogdan Smolka,et al.  Adaptive Non-local Means Filtering for Speckle Noise Reduction , 2014, ICCVG.

[50]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[51]  R. S. Anand,et al.  Despeckling of ultrasound medical images using nonlinear adaptive anisotropic diffusion in nonsubsampled shearlet domain , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[52]  Xuming Zhang,et al.  Nonlocal means method using weight refining for despeckling of ultrasound images , 2014, Signal Process..