Quantifying the influence of previously burned areas on suppression effectiveness and avoided exposure: A case study of the Las Conchas Fire

We present a case study of the Las Conchas Fire (2011) to explore the role of previously burned areas (wildfires and prescribed fires) on suppression effectiveness and avoided exposure. Methodological innovations include characterisation of the joint dynamics of fire growth and suppression activities, development of a fire line effectiveness framework, and quantification of relative fire line efficiencies inside and outside of previously burned areas. We provide descriptive statistics of several fire line effectiveness metrics. Additionally, we leverage burn probability modelling to examine how burned areas could have affected fire spread potential and subsequent exposure of highly valued resources and assets to fire. Results indicate that previous large fires exhibited significant and variable impacts on suppression effectiveness and fire spread potential. Most notably the Cerro Grande Fire (2000) likely exerted a significant and positive influence on containment, and in the absence of that fire the community of Los Alamos and the Los Alamos National Laboratory could have been exposed to higher potential for loss. Although our scope of inference is limited results are consistent with other research, suggesting that fires can exert negative feedbacks that can reduce resistance to control and enhance the effectiveness of suppression activities on future fires.

[1]  Richard D. Stratton Guidebook on LANDFIRE fuels data acquisition, critique, modification, maintenance, and model calibration , 2009 .

[2]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires , 2006 .

[3]  Tonja S. Opperman,et al.  LANDFIRE - A national vegetation/fuels data base for use in fuels treatment, restoration, and suppression planning , 2013 .

[4]  Steven G. Cumming,et al.  A parametric model of the fire-size distribution , 2001 .

[5]  Carol Miller,et al.  Previous Fires Moderate Burn Severity of Subsequent Wildland Fires in Two Large Western US Wilderness Areas , 2013, Ecosystems.

[6]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Progress towards and barriers to implementation of a risk framework for US federal wildland fire policy and decision making , 2011 .

[7]  Peter R. Robichaud,et al.  Review of fuel treatment effectiveness in forests and rangelands and a case study from the 2007 megafires in central, Idaho, USA , 2011 .

[8]  Michael C Wimberly,et al.  Assessing fuel treatment effectiveness using satellite imagery and spatial statistics. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  H. Temesgen,et al.  Evaluation of sampling strategies to estimate crown biomass , 2015, Forest Ecosystems.

[10]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Modeling containment of large wildfires using generalized linear mixed-model analysis , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Allowing a wildfire to burn: estimating the effect on future fire suppression costs , 2013 .

[12]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Quantifying the Threat of Unsuppressed Wildfires Reaching the Adjacent Wildland-Urban Interface on the Bridger-Teton National Forest, Wyoming, USA , 2012 .

[13]  João Claro,et al.  Forest fire management to avoid unintended consequences: a case study of Portugal using system dynamics. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into Wildland Urban Interface risk assessments within the United States , 2013 .

[15]  Alexandra D. Syphard,et al.  Factors affecting fuel break effectiveness in the control of large fires on the Los Padres National Forest, California , 2011 .

[16]  Lloyd P. Queen,et al.  Characterizing Fire-on-Fire Interactions in Three Large Wilderness Areas , 2012 .

[17]  Sandra L. Haire,et al.  Wilderness shapes contemporary fire size distributions across landscapes of the western United States , 2013 .

[18]  M. Finney FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[19]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Challenges and Approaches in Planning Fuel Treatments across Fire-Excluded Forested Landscapes , 2010, Journal of Forestry.

[20]  Jon D. Rieck,et al.  Built structure identification in wildland fire decision support , 2011 .

[21]  Carol Miller,et al.  Wildland fire as a self-regulating mechanism: the role of previous burns and weather in limiting fire progression. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  S. Stephens,et al.  The Effects of Forest Fuel-Reduction Treatments in the United States , 2012 .

[23]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Fuel treatment effects on modeled landscape- level fire behavior in the northern Sierra Nevada , 2010 .

[24]  L. Queen,et al.  Changes in Severity Distribution after Subsequent Fires on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA , 2014, Fire Ecology.

[25]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Econometric analysis of fire suppression production functions for large wildland fires , 2013 .

[27]  Birgit Peterson,et al.  The LANDFIRE Refresh Strategy: Updating the National Dataset , 2013, Fire Ecology.

[28]  Matthew P. Thompson Modeling Wildfire Incident Complexity Dynamics , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Andrew J. McMahan,et al.  Restoration of fire in managed forests: a model to prioritize landscapes and analyze tradeoffs , 2013 .

[30]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management , 2015, Forest Ecosystems.

[31]  Zissis Maditinos,et al.  Mega fires: can they be managed effectively? , 2011 .

[32]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  A Method for Ensemble Wildland Fire Simulation , 2011 .

[33]  Michael C. Wimberly,et al.  Estimation of wildfire size and risk changes due to fuels treatments , 2012 .

[34]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Adaptive economic and ecological forest management under risk , 2015, Forest Ecosystems.

[35]  B. C. Ward,et al.  Simulating landscape-scale effects of fuels treatments in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2011 .

[36]  David S. Pilliod,et al.  Pattern and process of prescribed fires influence effectiveness at reducing wildfire severity in dry coniferous forests , 2012 .

[37]  E. Knapp,et al.  Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[38]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Using Fire to Increase the Scale, Benefits, and Future Maintenance of Fuels Treatments , 2012 .

[39]  M. Rollins LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment , 2009 .

[40]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Interactions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area , 2009, Ecosystems.

[41]  Andrew T. Hudak,et al.  Burn Severity of Areas Reburned by Wildfires in the Gila National Forest, New Mexico, USA , 2010 .

[42]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  A fuel treatment reduces fire severity and increases suppression efficiency in a mixed conifer forest , 2007 .