Less adaption of newly approved variety Basmati 515 among aromatic basmati rice varieties in Kallar Tract of Punjab, Pakistan

A field survey was conducted after harvesting of rice crop 2016 to identify the reasons for less adaption of aromatic rice variety Basmati 515. The rice growers adopting rice-wheat cropping pattern in kallar tract were included in population of research study. Thirty male farmers from each selected district making a total of 180 respondent farmers were interviewed by convenience sampling method. The survey findings showed that the aromatic rice variety Basmati 515 was cultivated on only 2.7% rice area while maximum area (47.3%) was under Super basmati variety. The comparison of Basmati 515 was made with Super basmati and PS 2 due to comparatively more cultivated area and declared yield potential of these varieties. Overall the farmers were applying under dosed phosphorus fertilizer (DAP) as 0.25, 0.20 and 0.22 bag ha -1 respectively for basmati 515, super basmati and PS-2 varieties. The descriptive analysis showed that the less adaptability of basmati 515 was due to less yield and more attacks of borer (11%), BLB (10%) and leaf roller (3.25%) in comparison to other aromatic and fine rice varieties. Similarly maximum lodging (16%) was recorded on basmati 515. Maximum yield was estimated for PS 2 variety (4.7 t ha -1 ) followed by super basmati (4.0 t ha -1 ) and basmati 515 (3.78 t ha -1 ). The market price of super basmati was still higher due to its natural aroma, long & thin grain and export demand. The research institutes should focus for development of new aromatic high yielding and more qualitative rice varieties to increase the rice production and export.

[1]  Irfana Noor Memon,et al.  Economic Assessment of Rice Production in Sindh, Pakistan , 2017 .

[2]  Tewodros Getnet Determinates Of Farmers' Adoption Decisions Of Improved Seed Variety In Dabat District, Ethiopia , 2015 .

[3]  Muhammad Ashfaq,et al.  Basmati Rice a Class Apart (A review) , 2015 .

[4]  C. Msuya The comparative role of intervening and independent variables in the adoption behaviour of maize growers in Njombe district, Tanzania , 2008 .

[5]  N. Grotz,et al.  Limiting nutrients: an old problem with new solutions? , 2002, Current opinion in plant biology.

[6]  Munir Ahmad,et al.  Adoption of Recommended Varieties: A Farm level Analysis of Wheat Growers in Irrigated Punjab , 2002 .

[7]  Aloyce R. Kaliba,et al.  Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Maize Seeds and Use of Inorganic Fertilizer for Maize Production in the Intermediate and Lowland Zones of Tanzania , 2000, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[8]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[9]  Naeem,et al.  A field survey to identify the problems in adaptability of Direct Seeded Rice , 2017 .

[10]  Shahzad Kouser,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF RICE PRODUCTION IN PUNJAB (PAKISTAN) Implications for Future Investment Strategies , 2016 .

[11]  M. Younas,et al.  ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF DIRECT SEEDED AND TRANSPLANTED RICE: EVIDENCES FROM ADAPTIVE RESEARCH AREA OF PUNJAB PAKISTAN , 2016 .

[12]  M. Asghar,et al.  Farmers' perceptions and beliefs regarding future of rice crop in the Kallar tract of the Punjab, Pakistan. , 2015 .

[13]  A. Wahid,et al.  Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities , 2011 .

[14]  R. Packham,et al.  The farming systems approach , 2010 .

[15]  Katarzyna Bijak,et al.  Innovation adoption in agriculture : innovators, early adopters and laggards , 2003, Cahiers d'Economie et sociologie rurales.

[16]  W. R. Coffman,et al.  Rainfed lowland rice improvement. , 1996 .

[17]  P. Chantran Peasant participation in community development projects. , 1970 .