The effect of a triclosan/copolymer/fluoride liquid dentifrice on interproximal enamel remineralization and fluoride uptake.

BACKGROUND The authors measured the enamel remineralization of dental interproximal surfaces by a triclosan/copolymer/fluoride liquid dentifrice to test its performance against that of a standard toothpaste. METHODS In a randomized, crossover, blinded, in situ protocol, the authors fitted 19 healthy adult subjects with mandibular appliances holding bilateral, interproximal bovine enamel slabs. They measured initial abrasion levels and fluoride content. In a two-phase crossover protocol, they evaluated the percentage of surface mineral recovery, or SMR, and fluoride uptake caused by the experimental dentifrice and a fluoride-containing traditional control toothpaste. RESULTS Abrasion depths were similar and not different statistically (P > .05). The interproximal blocks exposed to the triclosan-containing liquid dentifrice had a mean fluoride uptake that was nearly 100 parts per million (13.1 percent) greater than that achieved with the American Dental Association-accepted control dentifrice. This finding, while not statistically significant, may indicate enhanced performance of the experimental dentifrice because the initial enamel slab abrasion depths were shown to be quite uniform. Moreover, the blocks exposed to the experimental toothpaste had a 49.8 percent SMR, while the positive control blocks had an SMR of only 36.9 percent. This enhanced remineralization performance was statistically significant (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to show enhanced performance of a triclosan-containing liquid dentifrice in preventing interproximal dental caries. The difference in percentage of SMR was statistically significant and is likely to be clinically relevant. CLINICAL IMPLICATION The results of this preliminary study offer evidence supporting clinicians' recommendation of the new liquid dentifrice to patients who are prone to developing interproximal carious lesions.

[1]  C. Scully,et al.  Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General , 2000, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[2]  J. Featherstone The science and practice of caries prevention. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  J. Featherstone,et al.  Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. , 1999, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[4]  N. Chilton,et al.  Interim Report of the ad hoc Committee for the Consideration of Statistical Concerns Related to the Use of Intra-oral Models in Submissions for Product Claims Approval to the American Dental Association , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[5]  G. Rølla,et al.  Critical Evaluation of the Composition and Use of Topical Fluorides, with Emphasis on the Role of Calcium Fluoride in Caries Inhibition , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[6]  A. Tatevossian Fluoride in Dental Plaque and its Effects , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[7]  Leon M. Silverstone,et al.  Fluoride in Dentistry , 1988 .

[8]  T. Koulourides,et al.  Mineral Density and Fluoride Content of in vitro Remineralized Lesions , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[9]  Fluoride Use,et al.  Fluorides and oral health. Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Oral Health Status and Fluoride Use. , 1994, World Health Organization technical report series.

[10]  A. Thylstrup,et al.  Rational use of fluorides in caries prevention. A concept based on possible cariostatic mechanisms. , 1981, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.