Reliability of signals from a chronically implanted, silicon-based electrode array in non-human primate primary motor cortex

Multiple-electrode arrays are valuable both as a research tool and as a sensor for neuromotor prosthetic devices, which could potentially restore voluntary motion and functional independence to paralyzed humans. Long-term array reliability is an important requirement for these applications. Here, we demonstrate the reliability of a regular array of 100 microelectrodes to obtain neural recordings from primary motor cortex (MI) of monkeys for at least three months and up to 1.5 years. We implanted Bionic (Cyberkinetics, Inc., Foxboro, MA) silicon probe arrays in MI of three Macaque monkeys. Neural signals were recorded during performance of an eight-direction, push-button task. Recording reliability was evaluated for 18, 35, or 51 sessions distributed over 83, 179, and 569 days after implantation, respectively, using qualitative and quantitative measures. A four-point signal quality scale was defined based on the waveform amplitude relative to noise. A single observer applied this scale to score signal quality for each electrode. A mean of 120 (/spl plusmn/17.6 SD), 146 (/spl plusmn/7.3), and 119 (/spl plusmn/16.9) neural-like waveforms were observed from 65-85 electrodes across subjects for all recording sessions of which over 80% were of high quality. Quantitative measures demonstrated that waveforms had signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) up to 20 with maximum peak-to-peak amplitude of over 1200 /spl mu/v with a mean SNR of 4.8 for signals ranked as high quality. Mean signal quality did not change over the duration of the evaluation period (slope 0.001, 0.0068 and 0.03; NS). By contrast, neural waveform shape varied between, but not within days in all animals, suggesting a shifting population of recorded neurons over time. Arm-movement related modulation was common and 66% of all recorded neurons were tuned to reach direction. The ability for the array to record neural signals from parietal cortex was also established. These results demonstrate that neural recordings that can provide movement related signals for neural prostheses, as well as for fundamental research applications, can be reliably obtained for long time periods using a monolithic microelectrode array in primate MI and potentially from other cortical areas as well.

[1]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Silicon microelectrodes for extracellular recording , 2002 .

[3]  Peter G. LoPresti,et al.  Silicon microelectrodes for extracellular recording , 2002 .

[4]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[5]  Daryl R. Kipke,et al.  Methods for modeling the relationship between extracellular recording variability and impedance properties of chronic neural implants , 1999, Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cat. N.

[6]  R A Normann,et al.  The Utah intracortical Electrode Array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Craig T. Nordhausen,et al.  Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array , 1996, Brain Research.

[8]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[9]  X Liu,et al.  Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  D. Kipke,et al.  Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. , 1999, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[11]  A. Rodríguez-Baeza,et al.  Morphological characteristics and distribution pattern of the arterial vessels in human cerebral cortex: A scanning electron microscope study , 1998, The Anatomical record.

[12]  K. Horch,et al.  Biocompatibility of silicon-based electrode arrays implanted in feline cortical tissue. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  D. Edell,et al.  Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  David C. Martin,et al.  In vivo studies of polypyrrole/peptide coated neural probes. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[15]  Scott T. Retterer,et al.  Model neural prostheses with integrated microfluidics: a potential intervention strategy for controlling reactive cell and tissue responses , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  S. Retterer,et al.  Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  A. Branner,et al.  A multielectrode array for intrafascicular recording and stimulation in sciatic nerve of cats , 2000, Brain Research Bulletin.

[18]  R. J. Vetter,et al.  Silicon-substrate intracortical microelectrode arrays for long-term recording of neuronal spike activity in cerebral cortex , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Paul M. George,et al.  Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[21]  S. Meagher.  Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[22]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[23]  E. M. Schmidt,et al.  Long-term chronic recording from cortical neurons , 1976, Experimental Neurology.

[24]  R. Normann,et al.  A method for pneumatically inserting an array of penetrating electrodes into cortical tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  T. Aziz,et al.  Electron microscopy of tissue adherent to explanted electrodes in dystonia and Parkinson's disease. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices , 2003, Brain Research.

[27]  Andrew B Schwartz,et al.  Cortical neural prosthetics. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  E. Maynard,et al.  A technique to prevent dural adhesions to chronically implanted microelectrode arrays , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.