Perceptual Expertise Effects Are Not All or None: Spatially Limited Perceptual Expertise for Faces in a Case of Prosopagnosia

We document a seemingly unique case of severe prosopagnosia, L. R., who suffered damage to his anterior and inferior right temporal lobe as a result of a motor vehicle accident. We systematically investigated each of three factors associated with expert face recognition: fine-level discrimination, holistic processing, and configural processing (Experiments 1-3). Surprisingly, L. R. shows preservation of all three of these processes; that is, his performance in these experiments is comparable to that of normal controls. However, L. R. is only able to apply these processes over a limited spatial extent to the fine-level detail within faces. Thus, when the location of a given change is unpredictable (Experiment 3), L. R. exhibits normal detection of features and spatial configurations only for the lower half of each face. Similarly, when required to divide his attention over multiple face features, L. R. is able to determine the identity of only a single feature (Experiment 4). We discuss these results in the context of forming a better understanding of prosopagnosia and the mechanisms used in face recognition and visual expertise. We conclude that these mechanisms are not all-or-none, but rather can be impaired incrementally, such that they may remain functional over a restricted spatial area. This conclusion is consistent with previous research suggesting that perceptual expertise is acquired in a spatially incremental manner [Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 431-446, 2002].

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Levine,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A defect in visual configural processing , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Recognition of faces versus Greebles: A case study in model selection Case Studies in Bayesian Stati , 2002 .

[4]  A. Damasio Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of acquired prosopagnosia , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal Greeble Learning in a Severe Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2004, Neuron.

[8]  V. Bruce,et al.  Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Constraining the cortical face network by neuroimaging studies of acquired prosopagnosia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  T. Langdell,et al.  Recognition of faces: an approach to the study of autism. , 1978, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[12]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Joseph,et al.  Holistic and part-based face recognition in children with autism. , 2003, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Are Greebles like faces? Using the neuropsychological exception to test the rule , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[17]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Richard J. Brown Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[21]  J Sergent,et al.  Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[24]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Pearson,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: Should it be Taken at Face Value? , 2001, Neurocase.

[26]  Constantine Gatsonis Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics , 1993 .

[27]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  J Sergent,et al.  Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing: evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal subjects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Galia Avidan,et al.  A detailed investigation of facial expression processing in congenital prosopagnosia as compared to acquired prosopagnosia , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  David K. A. Barnes,et al.  correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[36]  A. Benton Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual , 1983 .

[37]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Recognition of human faces from isolated facial features: A developmental study , 1966 .

[38]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[41]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Attending to Faces: Change Detection, Familiarization, and Inversion Effects , 2003, Perception.

[43]  Leonard A. Marascuilo,et al.  Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses , 1970 .

[44]  Katharina Henke,et al.  Specificity of Face Recognition: Recognition of Exemplars of Non-Face Objects In Prosopagnosia , 1998, Cortex.

[45]  S. McKelvie,et al.  The Role of Eyes and Mouth in the Memory of a Face. , 1976 .

[46]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[47]  G. J. Walker-Smith,et al.  The effects of delay and exposure duration in a face recognition task , 1978 .

[48]  B. Stephan,et al.  The recognition of emotional expression in prosopagnosia: Decoding whole and part faces , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[49]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[50]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Reclassification , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[52]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[53]  A. Young,et al.  Aspects of face processing , 1986 .

[54]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[55]  J. Keenan,et al.  Perception of global facial geometry in the inversion effect and prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[57]  James I. Brown The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. , 1960 .

[58]  M. Kilwein,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories revisited : a replication with sighted and blind college students / , 1993 .

[59]  L. Rapport,et al.  Validation of the Warrington theory of visual processing and the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.