The Use of Variable Stiffness Joints in Adaptive Structures

Adaptive structures are defined here as structures capable of counteracting actively the effect of external loads via controlled shape changes and redirection of the internal load path. These structures are integrated with sensors (e.g. strain, vision), control intelligence and actuators. This paper investigates the use of variable stiffness joints in adaptive structures to achieve large shape changes. Large shape changes are employed as a structural adaptation strategy to counteract the effect of the external load. The structure is designed to ‘morph’ into optimal shapes as the load changes. This way the stress can be homogenized avoiding peak demands that occur rarely. Numerical results show that when large shape changes are considered, material mass (and thus embodied energy) reduction is achieved with respect to both adaptive structures limited to small shape changes and optimised passive structures. Embodied energy savings become substantive when shape changes are allowed to go beyond conventional deflection limits. However, large shape changes require significant flexibility of the joints because their fixity can affect load-path and shape control. To address this problem, a variable stiffness joint is proposed. During shape/load-path control, the joint reduces its stiffness so that required deformation patterns can be achieved with low actuation energy. After shape control the joint recovers rigidity. Experimental studies are presented to show the potential for application of joints with variable stiffness in adaptive structures.

[1]  Philippe Duffour,et al.  Infinite stiffness structures via active control , 2015 .

[2]  Q. Meng,et al.  A review of shape memory polymer composites and blends , 2009 .

[3]  N. S. Khot,et al.  Multicriteria Optimization for Design of Structures with Active Control , 1998 .

[4]  Gennaro Senatore Adaptive building structures , 2016 .

[5]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Future directions in structural control , 2009 .

[6]  Franklin E. Eastep,et al.  Optimal structural modifications to enhance the optimal active vibration control of large flexible structures , 1985 .

[7]  Patrick Teuffel Entwerfen adaptiver Strukturen , 2004 .

[8]  M. Friswell,et al.  A review on shape memory alloys with applications to morphing aircraft , 2014 .

[9]  M. Barnes,et al.  Form Finding and Analysis of Tension Structures by Dynamic Relaxation , 1999 .

[10]  Gunnar Tibert,et al.  Deployable Tensegrity Structures for Space Applications , 2002 .

[11]  Sean Hanna,et al.  OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR SHELL AND SPATIAL STRUCTURES : J . IASS 1 PUMPING V . IRON ; LARGE SCALE ADAPTIVE SPATIAL STRUCTURES FOR WHOLE-LIFE ENERGY SAVINGS , 2011 .

[12]  Robert Bogue,et al.  Smart materials: a review of recent developments , 2012 .

[13]  Carlos Lazaro,et al.  Topology Optimized Adaptive Truss Structures , 2009 .

[14]  Daniel Piker,et al.  Interactive real-time physics: An intuitive approach to form-finding and structural analysis for design and education , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  L. Berke,et al.  Modified Fully Utilized Design (MFUD) Method for Stress and Displacement Constraints , 1998 .

[16]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Active tensegrity: A control framework for an adaptive civil-engineering structure , 2008 .

[17]  Alexander Hasse,et al.  Design of compliant mechanisms with selective compliance , 2009 .

[18]  T. T. Soong,et al.  State-of-the-art review: Active structural control in civil engineering , 1988 .

[19]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Adjustable Tensegrity Structures , 2003 .

[20]  Areti Markopoulou Design Behaviors; Programming Matter for Adaptive Architecture , 2015 .

[21]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Large and reversible shape changes as a strategy for structural adaptation , 2017 .

[22]  Christopher Jenkins Compliant structures in nature and engineering , 2005 .