Evaluating control strategies for outbreaks in BHV1-free areas using stochastic and spatial simulation.

Several countries within the EU have successfully eradicated bovine herpesvirus type I (BHV1), while others are still making efforts to eradicate the virus. Reintroduction of the virus into BHV1-free areas can lead to major outbreaks - thereby causing severe economic losses. To give decision-makers more insight into the risk and economic consequences of BHV1 reintroduction and into the effectiveness of various control strategies, we developed the simulation model InterIBR. InterIBR is a dynamic model that takes into account risk and uncertainty and the geographic location of individual farms. Simulation of a BHV1-outbreak in the Netherlands starts with introduction of the virus on a predefined farm type, after which both within-farm and between-farm transmission are simulated. Monitoring and control measures are implemented to simulate detection of the infection and subsequent control. Economic consequences included in this study are related to losses due to infection and costs of control. In the simulated basic control strategy, dairy farms are monitored by monthly bulk-milk tests and miscellaneous farms are monitored by half-yearly serological tests. After detection, movement-control measures apply, animal contacts are traced and neighbour farms are put on surveillance. Given current assumptions on transmission dynamics, we conclude that a strategy with either rapid removal or vaccination of infected cattle does not reduce the number of infected farms compared to this basic strategy - but will cost more to control. Farm type with first introduction of BHV1 has a considerable impact on the expected number of secondarily infected farms and total costs. To limit the number of infected farms and total costs due to outbreaks, we suggest intensifying the monitoring program on farms with a high frequency of cattle trade, and monthly bulk-milk testing on dairy farms.

[1]  M. D. Jong,et al.  Mathematical modelling in veterinary epidemiology: why model building is important , 1995 .

[2]  M. Ackermann,et al.  Pathogenesis of ruminant herpesvirus infections. , 1996, Veterinary microbiology.

[3]  H. Barkema,et al.  Population dynamics of bovine herpesvirus 1 infection in a dairy herd. , 1996, Veterinary microbiology.

[4]  Robert Lawrence Sanson The development of a decision support system for an animal disease emergency : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Massey University , 1993 .

[5]  F. Rijsewijk,et al.  Persistence of antibodies against bovine herpesvirus 1 and virus reactivation two to three years after infection. , 1996, Veterinary microbiology.

[6]  A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Animal Health Economics: Principles and Applications , 2002 .

[7]  A A Dijkhuizen,et al.  An epidemiological and economic simulation model to evaluate the spread and control of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in The Netherlands. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[8]  E. Thiry,et al.  The role of latency in the epizootiology of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis , 1984 .

[9]  O. Straub Chapter 11 – Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis Virus , 1990 .

[10]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Simulation: A Statistical Perspective , 1992 .

[11]  J. Bosch,et al.  Inactivated bovine herpesvirus 1 marker vaccines are more efficacious in reducing virus excretion after reactivation than a live marker vaccine. , 1997, Vaccine.

[12]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  Implications derived from a mathematical model for eradication of pseudorabies virus. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  R. Huirne,et al.  Risk factors for existence of Bovine Herpes Virus 1 antibodies on nonvaccinating Dutch dairy farms. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[14]  E. Thiry,et al.  Round table on infectious bovine rhinotracheitis/infectious pustular vulvovaginitis virus infection diagnosis and control. , 1990, Veterinary microbiology.

[15]  A. A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Introduction of contagious animal diseases into The Netherlands: elicitation of expert opinions , 1998 .

[16]  A. A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Quantification of contacts between Dutch farms to assess the potential risk of foot-and-mouth disease spread. , 1996 .

[17]  A. H. Kroese,et al.  An attenuated bovine herpesvirus 1 marker vaccine induces a better protection than two inactivated marker vaccines. , 1996, Veterinary microbiology.

[18]  H. Cornwell,et al.  An acute severe outbreak of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis: clinical, epidemiological, microbiological and pathological aspects , 1978, Veterinary Record.

[19]  H. Rziha,et al.  Latent Herpes Virus Infections in Veterinary Medicine , 1984, Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science.

[20]  David Vose,et al.  Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modelling , 1996 .

[21]  J. Verhoeff,et al.  Risk of infection with bovine herpes virus 1 (BHV1): a review. , 1993, The Veterinary quarterly.

[22]  R. Sanson THE DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR AN ANIMAL DISEASE EMERGENCY , 1993 .

[23]  P. Franken,et al.  Epidemiological characteristics of bovine herpesvirus 1 infections determined by bulk milk testing of all Dutch dairy herds , 1998, Veterinary Record.

[24]  H. Barkema,et al.  Milk production and reproduction during a subclinical bovine herpesvirus 1 infection on a dairy farm. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[25]  P. Franken,et al.  Probability of detecting antibodies to bovine herpesvirus 1 in bulk milk after the introduction of a positive animal on to a negative farm , 1997, Veterinary Record.