Brain simulation and personhood: a concern with the Human Brain Project

AbstractThe Human Brain Project (HBP) is a massive interdisciplinary project involving hundreds of researchers across more than eighty institutions that seeks to leverage cutting edge information and communication technologies to create a multi-level brain simulation platform (BSP). My worry is that some brain models running on the BSP will be persons. If this is right then not only will the in silico experiments the HBP envisions being carried on the BSP be unethical the mere termination of certain brain models running on the BSP will be unethical. To assess the possible personhood of certain brain simulations I consider John Searle’s critique of strong AI. In arguing that Searle’s critique fails I conclude that the HBP must tread carefully and devise strict rules on how research using the BSP ought to proceed.

[1]  Mary Anne Warren,et al.  On the moral and legal status of abortion. , 1973, The Monist.

[2]  Cecilia Wong,et al.  The Conscious Mind , 2015, Leonardo.

[3]  S. Shieber.  Subcognition and the Limits of the Turing Test , 2004 .

[4]  R. French.  Subcognition and the Limits of the TuringTest , 1990 .

[5]  R. Kurzweil.  How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed , 2012 .

[6]  Stevan Harnad.  Levels of Functional Equivalence in Reverse Bioengineering: The Darwinian Turing Test for Artificial Life , 1994 .

[7]  Robert M. French,et al.  Peeking behind the screen: the unsuspected power of the standard Turing Test , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[8]  Rob Lovering,et al.  A Defense of Abortion , 2003 .

[9]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[10]  John R. Searle,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[12]  Henry Markram,et al.  The human brain project. , 2012, Scientific American.

[13]  Martin Goldstein,et al.  How We Know , 1978 .

[14]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The ‘causal power’ of machines , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  John R. Searle,et al.  Minds, Brains and Science: The 1984 Reith Lectures , 1984 .

[16]  Gerard O'Brien,et al.  The role of representation in computation , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[17]  Stevan Harnad.  Levels of functional equivalence in reverse bioengineering , 1994 .

[18]  J. Searle,et al.  Minds, Brains and Science , 1988 .

[19]  Mark Sprevak,et al.  Chinese Rooms and Program Portability , 2007, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[20]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[21]  Wolfe Mays.  Can Machines Think , 1952 .

[22]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[23]  Donald Gustafson.  Minds, Brains, and Science , 1986 .