The rabbit gingival tissue response to retraction liquids and tetrahydrozoline.

UNLABELLED BACKROUND/AIM: Retraction agents for temporary vertical and lateral suppression of gingival tissue as well as bleeding control and fluid flow in the gingival sulcus are expected to have maximal efficiency without irreversible damage of local tissue and adverse systemic effects. The research started from the assumption that tetrahydrozoline is a biologically more acceptable means of gingival retraction than commercially available preparations. The aim of the study was to comparatively analyse the inflammatory effects of different retraction materials and tetrahydrozoline. METHODS The effect of retraction liquid on the basis of aluminum chloride and epinephrine and tetrahydrozoline hydrochloride on gingival tissue of rabbits was investigated. The application time in the rabbit's gingival sulcus was 7 minutes. Tissue biopsy was performed after an hour, a day, and 7 and 30 days. Tissue preparations were analyzed under a microscope. RESULTS The obtained results indicate a reversible damage of gingival tissues as a result of local application of aluminum chloride- and epinephrine-based retraction agents. Their use led to acute inflammatory response after an observation period of 1 and 7 days. After 30 days reparation of damaged tissue was observed. The use of tetrahydrozoline resulted in a visibly weaker inflammatory response. CONCLUSION Retraction liquids insertion led to an acute inflammatory response of gingival tissue which in time assumed a chronic character. The inflammatory response to the administered tetrahydrozoline was significantly lower with complete reparation of gingival tissue. Taking this fact into account it is recommended as a potential retraction agent.

[1]  S. Najman,et al.  Contemporary aspect of dental materials biocompatibility examination tests , 2010 .

[2]  A. Choromańska,et al.  Dynamic oxidoreductive potential of astringent retraction agents. , 2010, Folia biologica.

[3]  H. Dumfahrt,et al.  Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth. , 2009, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[4]  Khaled Q. Al Hamad,et al.  A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  M. Balkenhol,et al.  Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  A. Ozdemir,et al.  Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  Á. Fazekas,et al.  Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  S. Weiner,et al.  The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: a pilot study. , 2006, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[9]  M. Chou,et al.  Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. , 2004, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  J. Bader,et al.  A systematic review of cardiovascular effects of epinephrine on hypertensive dental patients. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[11]  E. Cvetko,et al.  Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in beagle dogs. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[12]  I. Kopač,et al.  Electron microscopic analysis of the effects of chemical retraction agents on cultured rat keratinocytes. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  E. Cvetko,et al.  Gingival tissue inflammatory response following treatment with chemical retraction agents in Beagle dogs , 2001, Pflügers Archiv.

[14]  A. Jokstad Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  L. P. Felpel A review of pharmacotherapeutics for prosthetic dentistry: Part I. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  H. Brand,et al.  Cardiovascular responses induced by dental treatment. , 2010, European journal of oral sciences.

[17]  S. Rosenstiel,et al.  Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  S. Tardy,et al.  Evaluation of New Gingival Retraction Agents , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[19]  T. Donovan,et al.  Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  J. Martinoff,et al.  A comparison of gingival inflammation related to retraction cords. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  M. el-Sadeek,et al.  Histopathologic response of gingival tissues to hemodent and aluminum chloride solutions as tissue displacement materials. , 1972, Egyptian dental journal.

[22]  J. D. Harrison Effect of retraction materials on the gingival sulcus epithelium , 1961 .