Kidney Transplantation Search Filters for PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Embase

Background. Clinicians commonly search bibliographic databases such as Medline to find sound evidence to guide patient care. Unfortunately, this can be a frustrating experience because database searches often miss relevant articles. We addressed this problem for transplant professionals by developing kidney transplantation search filters for use in Medline through PubMed and Ovid Technologies, and Embase. Methods. We began by reading the full-text versions of 22,992 articles from 39 journals published across 5 years. These articles were labeled relevant to kidney transplantation or not forming our “gold standard.” We then developed close to five million kidney transplantation filters using different terms and their combinations. Afterward, these filters were applied to development and validation subsets of the articles to determine their accuracy and reliability in identifying articles with kidney transplantation content. The final kidney transplantation filters used multiple terms in combination. Results. The best performing filters achieved 97.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 96.4%–98.5%), and 98.0% specificity (95% confidence interval, 97.8%–98.3%). Similar high performance was achieved for filters developed for Ovid Medline and Embase. Proof-of-concept searches confirmed more relevant articles are retrieved using these filters. Conclusions. These kidney transplantation filters can now be used in Medline and Embase databases to improve clinician searching.

[1]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Sample size determination for bibliographic retrieval studies , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[2]  K. A. McKibbon,et al.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  P. Morris,et al.  The Transplant Library of Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews , 2011, Transplantation.

[4]  S. Palmer,et al.  Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  D. Manas,et al.  Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  A. Webster,et al.  Antifungal agents for preventing fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  BMC Medicine BioMed Central , 2003 .

[8]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE , 2002, AMIA.

[9]  R. Cullen,et al.  In search of evidence: family practitioners' use of the Internet for clinical information. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[10]  R. Haynes,et al.  Medline : analytical survey scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Optimal search strategies for retrieving , 2004 .

[11]  H. C. Coumou,et al.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  A. Lim,et al.  Fish oil for kidney transplant recipients. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Causation Studies in MEDLINE , 2003, AMIA.

[14]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Filtering Medline for a clinical discipline: diagnostic test assessment framework , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  David W. Johnson,et al.  HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.