Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners

In this study of prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases, we test the hypothesis that the effect of victim characteristics is conditioned by the relationship between the victim and the suspect. We categorize the victim/suspect relationship as one involving strangers, acquaintances/relatives, or intimate partners, and we examine the effect of victim, suspect, and case characteristics on charging decisions in each type of case. The results of our analysis reveal that the effect of victim characteristics, with one exception, is confined to cases involving acquaintances and intimate partners. In these types of cases, prosecutors were less likely to file charges if there were questions about the victim's character or behavior at the time of the incident. In contrast, the victim's reputation and behavior did not affect charging in cases involving strangers; in those types of cases, prosecutors were more likely to file charges if the suspect used a gun or knife or if the victim was white. We conclude that stereotypes of “real rapes” and “genuine victims” continue to influence the charging decision in at least some types of sexual assault cases.

[1]  David W. Neubauer.  After the Arrest: The Charging Decision in Prairie City , 1974 .

[2]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[3]  A. Piquero,et al.  USING THE CORRECT STATISTICAL TEST FOR THE EQUALITY OF REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS , 1998 .

[4]  Elizabeth A. Stanko.  The Impact of Victim Assessment on Prosecutors' Screening Decisions: The Case of the New York County District Attorney's Office , 1981 .

[5]  D. J. Harris,et al.  Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform , 1984 .

[6]  R. Kingsnorth,et al.  Adult sexual assault: The role of racial/ethnic composition in prosecution and sentencing , 1998 .

[7]  M. Radelet,et al.  RACE AND PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION IN HOMICIDE CASES , 1985 .

[8]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Exploring victim-offender relationships in homicide: The role of individual and event characteristics , 1993 .

[9]  A. Walsh.  The Sexual Stratification Hypothesis and Sexual Assault in Light of the Changing Conceptions of Race , 1987 .

[10]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions , 1996 .

[11]  G. LaFree.  The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. , 1980, American sociological review.

[12]  C. Spohn,et al.  Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis , 1991 .

[13]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  The influence of blame and believability factors on the processing of simple versus aggravated rape cases , 1996 .

[14]  R. Paternoster.  Prosecutorial discretion in requesting the death penalty: A case of victim-based racial discrimination. , 1984 .

[15]  Gary LaFree,et al.  Rape and Criminal Justice: The Social Construction of Sexual Assault , 1989 .

[16]  Thomas W. McCahill,et al.  The Aftermath of Rape , 1979 .

[17]  Gary LaFree,et al.  Official Reactions to Social Problems: Police Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases , 1981 .

[18]  Lisa Frohmann,et al.  Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decisionmaking. , 1997 .

[19]  Howard Abadinsky.  Law and justice , 1988 .

[20]  S. Welch,et al.  THE IMPACT OF THE ETHNICITY AND GENDER OF DEFENDANTS ON THE DECISION TO REJECT OR DISMISS FELONY CHARGES , 1987 .

[21]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  Rape law reform : a grassroots revolution and its impact , 1992 .

[22]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  Rape law reform and the effect of victim characteristics on case processing , 1993 .

[23]  P. Allison,et al.  The Reimposition of Capital Punishment in New Jersey: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion , 1988 .

[24]  P. Ruschmann,et al.  Plea bargaining or trial? : by Lynn M. Mather. Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company (125 Spring Street, Lexington, Massachusetts 02173), 1979, 171 pp., hardcover—$16.95 , 1980 .

[25]  Wayne A. Kerstetter.  Gateway to Justice: Police and Prosecutorial Response to Sexual Assaults against Women , 1990 .

[26]  Christy A. Visher,et al.  The Impacts of Evidence and Extralegal Factors in Jurors' Decisions , 1986 .

[27]  Donald Black,et al.  The behavior of law , 1976 .

[28]  J. Hagan,et al.  Gender and Crime: Offense Patterns and Criminal Court Sanctions , 1983, Crime and Justice.

[29]  Scott R. Eliason.  Maximum likelihood estimation: Logic and practice. , 1994 .

[30]  Celesta A. Albonetti.  Prosecutorial Discretion: The Effects of Uncertainty , 1987 .

[31]  Celesta A. Albonetti.  CRIMINALITY, PROSECUTORIAL SCREENING, AND UNCERTAINTY: TOWARD A THEORY OF DISCRETIONARY DECISION MAKING IN FELONY CASE PROCESSINGS , 1986 .

[32]  T. Liao.  Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models , 1994 .

[33]  Robert A. Weninger.  Factors Affecting the Prosecution of Rape: A Case Study of Travis County, Texas , 1978 .

[34]  F. W. Miller,et al.  Prosecution : the decision to charge a suspect with a crime , 1974 .

[35]  D. Rauma,et al.  Going for the gold: Prosecutorial decision making in cases of wife assault , 1984 .

[36]  G. Vito,et al.  RACE, HOMICIDE SEVERITY, AND APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY: A CONSIDERATION OF THE BARNETT SCALE* , 1989 .

[37]  H. S. Feild,et al.  Jurors and rape : a study in psychology and law , 1980 .

[38]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[39]  R. MacIntosh,et al.  Sexual assault: The role of prior relationship and victim characteristics in case processing , 1999 .

[40]  S. Feldman-Summers,et al.  Perceptions of Victims and Defendants in Criminal Assault Cases , 1976 .

[41]  Charles E. Silberman,et al.  Criminal Violence, Criminal Justice. , 1978 .

[42]  W. D. Loh.  The Impact of Common Law and Reform Rape Statutes on Prosecution: An Empirical Study , 1980 .

[43]  David P. Bryden,et al.  Rape in the Criminal Justice System , 1997 .

[44]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  Decision Making in Criminal Justice , 1988 .

[45]  Janell D. Schmidt,et al.  PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION IN FILING CHARGES IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES , 1989 .

[46]  F. Feeney,et al.  Arrests without conviction : how often they occur and why , 1983 .

[47]  M. Myers.  Common Law in Action: the Prosecution of Felonies and Misdemeanors* , 1982 .

[48]  Leonore M. J. Simon.  Legal Treatment of the Victim-Offender Relationship in Crimes of Violence , 1996 .

[49]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1967 .

[50]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases , 1997 .

[51]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[52]  Lisa Frohmann,et al.  Discrediting Victims' Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections , 1991 .

[53]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  The Impact of Rape Law Reform on the Processing of Simple and Aggravated Rape Cases , 1996 .