Classification of Selective Attention Within Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potentials From Dry Electrodes Using Mutual Information-Based Spatio-Spectral Feature Selection

Nowadays, the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential (SSSEP)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) has been developed for improving the quality of daily life for people with physical disabilities. However, due to its poor performance of recognizing selective attention tasks and inattention(rest)-state, the SSSEP-based BCI has not been widely used for practical interfaces. In this paper, we propose a mutual information-based spatio-spectral feature selection method for recognizing selective attention tasks and inattention(rest)-state using dry electrodes considering a real-life application, when vibration stimuli were applied to both index fingers. In our methods, the filter-bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) was used for extracting spatio-spectral features of the SSSEP. Then, discriminative features were selected using a mutual information-based best individual feature (MIBIF) algorithm. The regularized linear discriminant analysis (RLDA) used as the classifier. The feasibility of the proposed method was demonstrated through eight healthy subjects using the vibration stimuli induced SSSEP with spatially clear and distinguishable patterns for SSSEP-based BCI. From our study, the proposed method showed the best classification accuracy with a kappa value of 0.35±0.17. Furthermore, based on the ANOVA with posthoc tests, the proposed method showed significantly higher accuracy as 57.9% in decoding three classes ( $p$ -value < 0.01) compared to the fast Fourier transform (FFT) and common spatial pattern (CSP)-based previous feature extraction methods. Consequently, the proposed FBCSP and MIBIF-based methods and findings can further help to improve decoding performance and develop the SSSEP-based BCI systems for real-world applications.

[1]  Amit Konar,et al.  Automatic feature selection of motor imagery EEG signals using differential evolution and learning automata , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[2]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Simultaneous EEG Recordings with Dry and Wet Electrodes in Motor-Imagery , 2011 .

[4]  Bin He,et al.  Brain–Computer Interfaces Using Sensorimotor Rhythms: Current State and Future Perspectives , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  The Role of Transient Target Stimuli in a Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potential-Based Brain–Computer Interface Setup , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[8]  Dong Ming,et al.  Enhancing performance of a motor imagery based brain–computer interface by incorporating electrical stimulation-induced SSSEP , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Seong-Whan Lee,et al.  Commanding a Brain-Controlled Wheelchair Using Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potentials , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Motion-Based Rapid Serial Visual Presentation for Gaze-Independent Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Atilla Kilicarslan,et al.  High accuracy decoding of user intentions using EEG to control a lower-body exoskeleton , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  O. Bai,et al.  Electroencephalography (EEG)-Based Brain–Computer Interface (BCI): A 2-D Virtual Wheelchair Control Based on Event-Related Desynchronization/Synchronization and State Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[14]  Li Zhang,et al.  Differential evolution algorithm as a tool for optimal feature subset selection in motor imagery EEG , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[16]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Common spatial patterns for steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[17]  John Williamson,et al.  A High Performance Spelling System based on EEG-EOG Signals With Visual Feedback , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Detection of braking intention in diverse situations during simulated driving based on EEG feature combination , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[20]  Xin Zhao,et al.  A Hybrid Brain Computer Interface Driven by Motor Imagery of Right Hand Versus Right Forearm , 2018, 2018 9th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST).

[21]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  A lower limb exoskeleton control system based on steady state visual evoked potentials , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  Christoph Pokorny,et al.  A hybrid three-class brain-computer interface system utilizing SSSEPs and transient ERPs. , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  An SSVEP BCI to Control a Hand Orthosis for Persons With Tetraplegia , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005 , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  K. Müller,et al.  Effect of higher frequency on the classification of steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[27]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[28]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Dry versus Wet EEG electrode systems in Motor Imagery Classification , 2017 .

[29]  J. Friedman Regularized Discriminant Analysis , 1989 .

[30]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  „Resonance-like“ Frequencies of Sensorimotor Areas Evoked by Repetitive Tactile Stimulation - Resonanzeffekte in sensomotorischen Arealen, evoziert durch rhythmische taktile Stimulation , 2001, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[31]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.