Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.

CONTEXT Substantial discrepanies exist between clinical diagnoses and findings at autopsy. Autopsy may be used as a tool for quality management to analyze diagnostic discrepanies. OBJECTIVE To determine the rate at which autopsies detect important, clinically missed diagnoses, and the extent to which this rate has changed over time. DATA SOURCES A systematic literature search for English-language articles available on MEDLINE from 1966 to April 2002, using the search terms autopsy, postmortem changes, post-mortem, postmortem, necropsy, and posthumous, identified 45 studies reporting 53 distinct autopsy series meeting prospectively defined criteria. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional studies, and the final bibliography was distributed to experts in the field to identify missing or unpublished studies. STUDY SELECTION Included studies reported clinically missed diagnoses involving a primary cause of death (major errors), with the most serious being those likely to have affected patient outcome (class I errors). DATA EXTRACTION Logistic regression was performed using data from 53 distinct autopsy series over a 40-year period and adjusting for the effects of changes in autopsy rates, country, case mix (general autopsies; adult medical; adult intensive care; adult or pediatric surgery; general pediatrics or pediatric inpatients; neonatal or pediatric intensive care; and other autopsy), and important methodological features of the primary studies. DATA SYNTHESIS Of 53 autopsy series identified, 42 reported major errors and 37 reported class I errors. Twenty-six autopsy series reported both major and class I error rates. The median error rate was 23.5% (range, 4.1%-49.8%) for major errors and 9.0% (range, 0%-20.7%) for class I errors. Analyses of diagnostic error rates adjusting for the effects of case mix, country, and autopsy rate yielded relative decreases per decade of 19.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-33.8%) for major errors and 33.4% (95% [CI], 8.4%-51.6%) for class I errors. Despite these decreases, we estimated that a contemporary US institution (based on autopsy rates ranging from 100% [the extrapolated extreme at which clinical selection is eliminated] to 5% [roughly the national average]), could observe a major error rate from 8.4% to 24.4% and a class I error rate from 4.1% to 6.7%. CONCLUSION The possibility that a given autopsy will reveal important unsuspected diagnoses has decreased over time, but remains sufficiently high that encouraging ongoing use of the autopsy appears warranted.

[1]  M. Britton Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[2]  James H. Diaz,et al.  Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical Errors: Preventability Is in the Eye of the Reviewer , 2002 .

[3]  M. Mckenney,et al.  Unexpected findings in trauma patients dying in the intensive care unit: results of 153 consecutive autopsies. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  M. Podbregar,et al.  Should we confirm our clinical diagnostic certainty by autopsies? , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[5]  N. Kabra,et al.  Correlation between clinical diagnoses at the time of death and autopsy findings in critically sick neonates at a regional neonatal intensive care unit in India. , 2001, Journal of tropical pediatrics.

[6]  J. Sinard Factors affecting autopsy rates, autopsy request rates, and autopsy findings at a large academic medical center. , 2001, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[7]  R Platt,et al.  Is There a “Best” Way to Detect and Minimize Publication Bias? , 2001, Evaluation & the health professions.

[8]  M. Lamarre-Cliche,et al.  Association between the burden of disease and research funding by the Medical Research Council of Canada and the National Institutes of Health. A cross-sectional study. , 2001, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[9]  P. Sanderson,et al.  A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnoses of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  E. Mascha,et al.  A study of consecutive autopsies in a medical ICU : a comparison of clinical cause of death and autopsy diagnosis. , 2001, Chest.

[11]  H. Sox,et al.  How many deaths are due to medical error? Getting the number right. , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[12]  American College of Clinical Pharmacology Response to the Institute of Medicine Report “To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System” , 2000, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[13]  C J McDonald,et al.  Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in Institute of Medicine report. , 2000, JAMA.

[14]  Katharina Sonderegger-lseli,et al.  Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study , 2000, The Lancet.

[15]  G. Tse,et al.  A 12-month review of autopsies performed at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Hong Kong. , 2000, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[16]  Burton Ec,et al.  Medical error and outcomes measures: where have all the autopsies gone? , 2000 .

[17]  R. Truog,et al.  Autopsy consent practice at US teaching hospitals: results of a national survey. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  P. Lee,et al.  Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  N. Powe,et al.  The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  H. Varmus,et al.  Evaluating the burden of disease and spending the research dollars of the National Institutes of Health. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  P. Barr,et al.  An evaluation of the autopsy following death in a Level IV neonatal intensive care unit , 1999, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[22]  T. Mort,et al.  The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[23]  L. Nichols,et al.  Are autopsies obsolete? , 1998, American journal of clinical pathology.

[24]  J. Stauffer,et al.  Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected? , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[25]  H. Mangurten,et al.  Autopsies in children: are they still useful? , 1998, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[26]  R. Hruban,et al.  The autopsy: still important in cardiac surgery. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  P. J. Howanitz,et al.  Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting, final autopsy report turnaround time, and autopsy rates: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 10003 autopsies from 418 institutions. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  R. Atmar,et al.  Unanticipated diagnoses found at autopsy in an urban public teaching hospital. , 1996, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[29]  C. Cox,et al.  Association of pre mortem diagnosis and autopsy findings in pediatric intensive care unit versus emergency department versus ward patients. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[30]  F. DiCarlo,et al.  Lessons learned from autopsies at a pediatric teaching hospital. , 1995, New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.

[31]  M. Sanner Medical students' attitudes toward autopsy. How does experience with autopsies influence opinion? , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[32]  D. Saller,et al.  The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy. , 1995, JAMA.

[33]  D McLerran,et al.  Using administrative data to describe casemix: a comparison with the medical record. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  N. Kissoon,et al.  The utility of autopsies in a pediatric emergency department , 1994, Pediatric emergency care.

[35]  I. Alafuzoff,et al.  A retrospective analysis of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 3,042 cases during two different time periods. , 1994, Human pathology.

[36]  P. Romano,et al.  Can Administrative Data be Used to Compare the Quality of Health Care? , 1993, Medical care review.

[37]  I. Alafuzoff,et al.  Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras. , 1993, Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care.

[38]  V. Gadaleanu,et al.  The reliability of autopsy diagnostics: inter-observer variation between pathologists, a preliminary report. , 1993, Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care.

[39]  I. Hägerstrand,et al.  The importance of post-mortem examinations of abortions and perinatal deaths. , 1993, Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care.

[40]  Jesse Green,et al.  How Accurate are Hospital Discharge Data for Evaluating Effectiveness of Care? , 1993, Medical care.

[41]  R. Boxer,et al.  Correlation between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in critically ill children. , 1993, Pediatrics.

[42]  B. Radotra,et al.  Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: a review of 1,000 cases. , 1993, Human pathology.

[43]  G. Ferraro,et al.  Use of computers in anticoagulant clinics. , 1992, Journal of clinical pathology.

[44]  P. Mckelvie,et al.  Autopsy rate and a clinicopathological audit in an Australian metropolitan hospital — cause for concern? , 1992, The Medical journal of Australia.

[45]  J. Stothert,et al.  Autopsy in general surgery practice. , 1991, American journal of surgery.

[46]  M. R. Widmer,et al.  Clinical diagnosis versus autopsy. , 1991, Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization.

[47]  C. Mangione,et al.  Treatable abdominal pathologic conditions and unsuspected malignant neoplasms at autopsy in veterans who received mechanical ventilation. , 1991, JAMA.

[48]  P. Yarnold,et al.  An autopsy-based study of diagnostic errors in geriatric and nongeriatric adult patients. , 1989, Archives of internal medicine.

[49]  B. Blackbourne,et al.  Use of autopsy results in the emergency department quality assurance plan. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[50]  C R Key,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades. Toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. , 1989, JAMA.

[51]  A. Lázaro,et al.  Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit. , 1988, Critical care medicine.

[52]  J. Hermans,et al.  Value of autopsy in internal medicine: a 1 ‐year prospective study of hospital deaths , 1988, European journal of clinical investigation.

[53]  L. Goldman,et al.  Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[54]  C. Key,et al.  Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. , 1987, JAMA.

[55]  V. Kanjuh,et al.  Correlation of clinical diagnoses with autopsy findings: a retrospective study of 2,145 consecutive autopsies. , 1986, Human pathology.

[56]  E. J. Fulton,et al.  Unexpected findings and complications at autopsy after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). , 1986, Archives of internal medicine.

[57]  A. Schned,et al.  A comprehensive quality assessment program on the autopsy service. , 1986, American journal of clinical pathology.

[58]  W. Clewell,et al.  Perinatal Autopsy: Its Clinical Value , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  M. Horowitz,et al.  The value of the autopsy in medical audit--a combined clinical and pathological assessment of 100 cases. , 1983, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[60]  J. Ahronheim,et al.  Age trends in autopsy rates. Striking decline in late life. , 1983, JAMA.

[61]  J. Puxty,et al.  NECROPSIES IN THE ELDERLY , 1983, The Lancet.

[62]  L. Goldman,et al.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[63]  D. Schottenfeld,et al.  The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. , 1982, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[64]  W. Thurlbeck Accuracy of clinical diagnosis , 1982 .

[65]  W. Thurlbeck Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in a Canadian teaching hospital. , 1981, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[66]  H. M. Cameron,et al.  A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification , 1981, The Journal of pathology.

[67]  E. Mcgoogan,et al.  A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: II. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical diagnoses and their significance , 1981, The Journal of pathology.

[68]  E. Mcgoogan,et al.  Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses. , 1980, British medical journal.

[69]  Davis Cj Autopsy rates: the decline with age. , 1979 .

[70]  J. G. West,et al.  Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. , 1979, Archives of surgery.

[71]  R. Cabot DIAGNOSTIC PITFALLS IDENTIFIED DURING A STUDY OF THREE THOUSAND AUTOPSIES , 1912 .

[72]  L. Goldman,et al.  The autopsy as an outcome and performance measure. , 2002, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[73]  P. Nemetz,et al.  Medical error and outcomes measures: where have all the autopsies gone? , 2000, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[74]  H. Mangurten,et al.  Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience. , 2000, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[75]  E. Cutz,et al.  Autopsy in a neonatal intensive care unit: utilization patterns and associations of clinicopathologic discordances. , 1998, The Journal of pediatrics.

[76]  W Kirch,et al.  Misdiagnosis at a university hospital in 4 medical eras. , 1996, Medicine.

[77]  F. Fabris,et al.  Autopsy and multiple pathology in the elderly. , 1993, Gerontology.

[78]  J. Shanks,et al.  Use of the autopsy in Northern Ireland and its value in perioperative deaths. , 1991, IARC scientific publications.