A Dual Response DNA Probe for Simultaneously Monitoring Enzymatic Activity and Environmental pH by Nanopores.

Both protease overexpression and local pH in tumor environment are key signatures of cancer. However, sensitive detection of protease activities and accurate measurement of pH in a tumor environment remain challenging. Here, we develop a dual response DNA probe that can simultaneously monitor protease activities and measure the local pH by translocation through α-hemolysin (αHL). The DNA probe bears a short peptide containing phenylalanine (F) at a pre-designed position. Enzymatic cleavage of the peptide either exposes or removes N-terminal F which could form complexes with cucurbit[7]uril. Translocation of the DNA hybrid through αHL generates current signatures that can be used for quantifying protease activities. Furthermore, the current signatures possess pH-dependent pattern which can precisely reflect the local pH. Our results demonstrate that the versatile DNA probe may be further explored for simultaneously measuring multiple parameters of a complex system such as single cells in the future.

[1]  Adam R. Urbach,et al.  Nanomolar binding of peptides containing noncanonical amino acids by a synthetic receptor. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  He Tian,et al.  Discrimination of oligonucleotides of different lengths with a wild-type aerolysin nanopore. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[3]  Deqiang Wang,et al.  Real-time monitoring of peptide cleavage using a nanopore probe. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  Hai‐Chen Wu,et al.  Analyte-Triggered DNA-Probe Release from a Triplex Molecular Beacon for Nanopore Sensing. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  Yana K Reshetnyak,et al.  A novel technology for the imaging of acidic prostate tumors by positron emission tomography. , 2009, Cancer research.

[6]  Hongyuan Chen,et al.  Lysosome-Targeting Fluorogenic Probe for Cathepsin B Imaging in Living Cells. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  Tumor pH and Its Measurement , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Pernille R. Jensen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate , 2008, Nature.

[9]  Christoph R Bauer,et al.  Unprecedented Sensitivity in a Probe for Monitoring Cathepsin B: Chemiluminescence Microscopy Cell-Imaging of a Natively Expressed Enzyme. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[10]  S. Knapp,et al.  Stochastic detection of Pim protein kinases reveals electrostatically enhanced association of a peptide substrate , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  K. Burgess,et al.  A ratiometric pH reporter for imaging protein-dye conjugates in living cells. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Liang Wang,et al.  Label-free nanopore single-molecule measurement of trypsin activity. , 2016, ACS sensors.

[13]  Huimin Ma,et al.  Leucine aminopeptidase may contribute to the intrinsic resistance of cancer cells toward cisplatin as revealed by an ultrasensitive fluorescent probe , 2015, Chemical science.

[14]  D. Shangguan,et al.  Protease-activated ratiometric fluorescent probe for pH mapping of malignant tumors. , 2015, ACS nano.

[15]  M. Moses,et al.  Matrix metalloproteinases as novel biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in human cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Y. Ko,et al.  Sequence recognition and self-sorting of a dipeptide by cucurbit[6]uril and cucurbit[7]uril. , 2008, Chemical communications.

[17]  Baorui Liu,et al.  Successively activatable ultrasensitive probe for imaging tumour acidity and hypoxia , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Huangxian Ju,et al.  Folate receptor-targeted and cathepsin B-activatable nanoprobe for in situ therapeutic monitoring of photosensitive cell death. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  C. Gondi,et al.  Cathepsin B as a cancer target , 2013, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[20]  J. Whisstock,et al.  Bestatin-based chemical biology strategy reveals distinct roles for malaria M1- and M17-family aminopeptidases , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Tom Chou,et al.  Enhancement of charged macromolecule capture by nanopores in a salt gradient. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  A. Taylor Aminopeptidases: structure and function , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  Tomaso Zambelli,et al.  Localized detection of ions and biomolecules with a force-controlled scanning nanopore microscope , 2019, Nature Nanotechnology.

[24]  D. Shangguan,et al.  Dual-Ratiometric Target-Triggered Fluorescent Probe for Simultaneous Quantitative Visualization of Tumor Microenvironment Protease Activity and pH in Vivo. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  Costas P. Grigoropoulos,et al.  Stochastic transport through carbon nanotubes in lipid bilayers and live cell membranes , 2014, Nature.

[26]  C. Wloka,et al.  Label-Free and Real-Time Detection of Protein Ubiquitination with a Biological Nanopore , 2017, ACS nano.

[27]  George M Yousef,et al.  Human tissue kallikreins: a family of new cancer biomarkers. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[28]  R. Gillies,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy in cancer. , 2005, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[29]  Alexander Y. Grosberg,et al.  Electrostatic Focusing of Unlabeled DNA into Nanoscale Pores using a Salt Gradient , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[30]  Moungi G Bawendi,et al.  A ratiometric CdSe/ZnS nanocrystal pH sensor. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  M. Duffy,et al.  Proteases as prognostic markers in cancer. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[32]  R. Weissleder Molecular Imaging in Cancer , 2006, Science.

[33]  Neha Aggarwal,et al.  Cathepsin B: Multiple roles in cancer , 2014, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[34]  W. Tan,et al.  Stable DNA Nanomachine Based on Duplex–Triplex Transition for Ratiometric Imaging Instantaneous pH Changes in Living Cells , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  Stefan Howorka,et al.  Nanopore-based electrical and label-free sensing of enzyme activity in blood serum. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[36]  R. Daniel,et al.  Kinetics of enzymatic degradation of high molecular weight polysaccharides through a nanopore: experiments and data-modeling. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  P. Trail,et al.  Cathepsin B-labile dipeptide linkers for lysosomal release of doxorubicin from internalizing immunoconjugates: model studies of enzymatic drug release and antigen-specific in vitro anticancer activity. , 2002, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[38]  H. White,et al.  Base-excision repair activity of uracil-DNA glycosylase monitored using the latch zone of α-hemolysin. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[39]  J. Joyce,et al.  Proteolytic networks in cancer. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[40]  Hai‐Chen Wu,et al.  Simultaneous Quantification of Multiple Cancer Biomarkers in Blood Samples through DNA-Assisted Nanopore Sensing. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[41]  Weihong Zhu,et al.  A Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Monitoring Leucine Aminopeptidase in Living Cells and Zebrafish Model. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[42]  Ki Young Choi,et al.  Protease-Activated Drug Development , 2012, Theranostics.

[43]  A. Szpaderska,et al.  An intracellular form of cathepsin B contributes to invasiveness in cancer. , 2001, Cancer research.

[44]  Jiani Xie,et al.  A universal strategy for aptamer-based nanopore sensing through host-guest interactions inside α-hemolysin. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[45]  X. Guan,et al.  Real-time label-free measurement of HIV-1 protease activity by nanopore analysis. , 2014, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[46]  H. Bayley,et al.  Stochastic sensors inspired by biology , 2001, Nature.

[47]  Juyoung Yoon,et al.  In vivo near-infrared imaging and phototherapy of tumors using a cathepsin B-activated fluorescent probe. , 2017, Biomaterials.