Dealing with uncertainty

Processes in the healthcare domain are characterized by coarsely predefined recurring procedures that are flexibly adapted by the personnel to suite-specific situations. In this setting, a workflow management system that gives guidance and documents the personnel's actions can lead to a higher quality of care, fewer mistakes, and higher efficiency. However, most existing workflow management systems enforce rigid inflexible workflows and rely on direct manual input. Both are inadequate for healthcare processes. In particular, direct manual input is not possible in most cases since (1) it would distract the personnel even in critical situations and (2) it would violate fundamental hygiene principles by requiring disinfected doctors and nurses to touch input devices. The solution could be activity recognition systems that use sensor data (e.g., audio and acceleration data) to infer the current activities by the personnel and provide input to a workflow (e.g., informing it that a certain activity is finished now). However, state-of-the-art activity recognition technologies have difficulties in providing reliable information. We describe a comprehensive framework tailored for flexible human-centric healthcare processes that improves the reliability of activity recognition data. We present a set of mechanisms that exploit the application knowledge encoded in workflows in order to reduce the uncertainty of this data, thus enabling unobtrusive robust healthcare workflows. We evaluate our work based on a real-world case study and show that the robustness of unobtrusive healthcare workflows can be increased to an absolute value of up to 91% (compared to only 12% with a classical workflow system). This is a major breakthrough that paves the way towards future IT-enabled healthcare systems.

[1]  Oliver Kopp,et al.  Towards Context-aware Workflows , 2007 .

[2]  Otmar Adam,et al.  Fuzzy Workflows-Enhancing Workflow Management with Vagueness , 2003 .

[3]  Frank Dürr,et al.  On a Generic Uncertainty Model for Position Information , 2009, QuaCon.

[4]  Liqiang Geng,et al.  Bayesian Classification of Events for Task Labeling Using Workflow Models , 2008, Business Process Management Workshops.

[5]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Declarative workflows: Balancing between flexibility and support , 2009, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[6]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  DECLARE: Full Support for Loosely-Structured Processes , 2007, 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007).

[7]  Frank Leymann,et al.  PerFlows for the computers of the 21st century , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.

[8]  Donald E. Brown,et al.  Health-status monitoring through analysis of behavioral patterns , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[9]  Hai Yang,et al.  ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology - Special Section on Urban Computing , 2014 .

[10]  Dragos Manolescu,et al.  Production workflow: concepts and techniques , 2001, SOEN.

[11]  Christopher D. Gill,et al.  Sliver: A BPEL Workflow Process Execution Engine for Mobile Devices , 2006, ICSOC.

[12]  Matthai Philipose,et al.  Towards Activity Databases: Using Sensors and Statistical Models to Summarize People's Lives , 2006, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[13]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[14]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  The ProM Framework: A New Era in Process Mining Tool Support , 2005, ICATPN.

[15]  Kurt Rothermel,et al.  FlexCon - Robust Context Handling in Human-Oriented Pervasive Flows , 2011, OTM Conferences.

[16]  Kurt Rothermel,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Context Awareness for Situated Workflows , 2009, OTM Workshops.

[17]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Adaptable Pervasive Flows - An Emerging Technology for Pervasive Adaptation , 2008, 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops.

[18]  Christopher D. Gill,et al.  Extending BPEL for Interoperable Pervasive Computing , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Services.

[19]  Frank Leymann,et al.  Towards Integration of Uncertain Sensor Data into Context-aware Workflows , 2009, GI Jahrestagung.

[20]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial intelligence - a modern approach, 2nd Edition , 2003, Prentice Hall series in artificial intelligence.

[21]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[22]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Flexibility as a Service , 2009, DASFAA Workshops.

[23]  Dimitra Giannakopoulou,et al.  Automata-based verification of temporal properties on running programs , 2001, Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001).

[24]  Kurt Rothermel,et al.  Robustness in context-aware mobile computing , 2010, 2010 IEEE 6th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications.

[25]  Kurt Rothermel,et al.  Cordies: expressive event correlation in distributed systems , 2010, DEBS '10.

[26]  Weimin Huang,et al.  Health and wellness monitoring through wearable and ambient sensors: exemplars from home-based care of elderly with mild dementia , 2010, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[27]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Verifying Existence, Completeness and Sequences of Semantic Process Patterns in Real Workflow Processes , 2008 .

[28]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Discovery and Analysis of Activity Pattern Co-occurrences in Business Process Models , 2009, ICEIS.

[29]  Oliver Thomas,et al.  Fuzzy-Set-Based Modeling of Business Process Cases , 2005, ICCBR Workshops.

[30]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Clinical Workflows - The Killer Application for Process-oriented Information Systems? , 2000 .