Structure-based analysis of dynamic engineering process behavior

The dynamic behavior of complex systems is a well-known challenge within engineering. The major drawback of dependency modeling approaches for system analysis such as the Design Structure Matrix is that they depict a static view on the system and therefore only allow very limited statements about the dynamic behavior of systems even though the structure mainly defines the system's behavior. Approaches to model the dynamic behavior of complex systems such as System Dynamics, do not offer the possibilities of dependency modeling, as static aspects such as the underlying structure of the system cannot be easily described. This paper proposes a framework for a structure-based analysis of the dynamic behavior of systems and combines dependency modeling approaches and System Dynamics. The framework can be used as an approach to generate dynamic system understanding, decision support through simulation experiments and benchmark different process structures by analyzing the relationship between underlying structure and dynamic behavior of the system. This allows for a projection of the performance of the system over time, based on its structure. The paper gives an overview of the framework, including the initial structural Multiple Domain Matrix model, the dynamizing and customizing of the model, model verification, the simulation of different variants of the underlying system structure and the analysis of the system structure based on the simulation results. The framework is applied within an exemplary case study where two different system structures of a design process are analyzed.

[1]  Kenneth Cooper Naval Ship Production: A Claim Settled and a Framework Built , 1980 .

[2]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Computer Simulation in Management Science (3rd Edition) , 1998 .

[3]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[4]  S. Hanson,et al.  Real World Applications , 1997 .

[5]  David N. Ford,et al.  Dynamic modeling of product development processes , 1998 .

[6]  Alexandre G. Rodrigues,et al.  The application of system dynamics to project management : an integrated methodology , 2000 .

[7]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[8]  Alexandre G. Rodrigues,et al.  Managing and Modelling Project Risk Dynamics A System Dynamics-based Framework , 2001 .

[9]  A. Borshchev,et al.  From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling : Reasons , Techniques , Tools , 2004 .

[10]  Steffen Bayer,et al.  Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world , 2004 .

[11]  Maik Maurer,et al.  Structural Awareness in Complex Product Design , 2007 .

[12]  David N. Ford,et al.  System Dynamics Applied to Project Management: A Survey, Assessment, and Directions for Future Research , 2007, System Dynamics.

[13]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach , 2007 .

[14]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Structural Complexity Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design , 2008 .

[15]  U. Lindemann,et al.  Structural Complexity Management , 2009 .

[16]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  RE-DESIGNING PD PROCESS ARCHITECTURE BY TRANSFORMING TASK NETWORK MODELS INTO SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODELS , 2010 .

[17]  Koji Kimita,et al.  The Philosopher's Stone for Sustainability , 2013 .

[18]  Andreas Kohn,et al.  Identifying Uncertainties within Structural Complexity Management , 2013 .

[19]  Daniel Kasperek,et al.  Coupling Structural Complexity Management and System Dynamics to represent the dynamic behavior of product development processes , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon).

[20]  Mario Boßlau,et al.  Design and Engineering of Dynamic Business Models for Industrial Product-Service Systems , 2013 .