Technology's Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction

We present results from a randomized study of a well-defined use of computers in schools: a popular instructional computer program for pre-algebra and algebra. We assess the program using a test designed to target pre-algebra and algebra skills. Students randomly assigned to computer-aided instruction score 0.17 of a standard deviation higher on pre-algebra/algebra tests than students randomly assigned to traditional instruction. We hypothesize that the effectiveness arises from increased individualized instruction as the effects appear larger for students in larger classes and in classes with high student absentee rates.

[1]  Alan B. Krueger,et al.  Putting Computerized Instruction to the Test: A Randomized Evaluation of a "Scientifically-Based" Reading Program , 2004 .

[2]  S. Machin,et al.  New Technology in Schools: Is There a Payoff? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Lisa Barrow,et al.  Technology's Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction. NBER Working Paper No. 14240. , 2008 .

[4]  E. Lazear,et al.  Educational Production , 1999 .

[5]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[6]  R. Murnane,et al.  The Growing Importance of Cognitive Skills in Wage Determination , 1995 .

[7]  Colleen F. Surber.  Self-Pacing Versus Pacing Requirements: Criterion Measures, Student Evaluations, and Retention. , 1976 .

[8]  Donald Boyd,et al.  The Effect of Certification and Preparation on Teacher Quality , 2007, The Future of children.

[9]  Max E. Jerman,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1969, Science.

[10]  J. R. Enochs,et al.  Relating Learning Style, Reading Vocabulary, Reading Comprehension, and Aptitude for Learning to Achievement in the Self-Paced and Computer-Assisted Instructional Modes , 1986 .

[11]  Harold H. Wenglinsky.  Does It Compute? The Relationship between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. , 1998 .

[12]  A. Krueger,et al.  Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions , 1997 .

[13]  Sidney W. Bijou,et al.  Self- versus instructor-pacing: Achievement, evaluations, and retention. , 1978 .

[14]  Xiaoping Wang,et al.  Usage of Instructional Materials in High Schools: Analyses of NELS Data. , 2002 .

[15]  James S. Braswell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics, 2000. , 2001 .

[16]  Jeffrey Grogger,et al.  Does School Quality Explain the Recent Black/White Wage Trend? , 1996, Journal of Labor Economics.

[17]  Marjorie Ragosta.  Computer-Assisted Instruction and Compensatory Education: The ETS/LAUSD Study. The Final Report. , 1982 .

[18]  R. Murnane,et al.  What Is the Problem? The Challenge of Providing Effective Teachers for All Children , 2007, The Future of children.

[19]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. , 1991 .

[20]  Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach,et al.  What Have Researchers Learned from Project STAR? , 2006 .

[21]  P. Twining.  Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[22]  Stig Enemark.  The Growing Importance of CPD , 1998 .

[23]  James S. Braswell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics, 2000. , 2001 .

[24]  J. Staudenmeier.  Children and computers. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[25]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Computers Make Kids Smarter—Right? , 1998 .

[26]  B. Annexure.  DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION , 2002 .

[27]  J. Angrist,et al.  New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research , 2008 .

[29]  M. Lepper,et al.  Children and computers. Approaching the twenty-first century. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[30]  Cecilia Elena Rouse,et al.  Do Accountability and Voucher Threats Improve Low-Performing Schools? , 2005 .