NIAC Phase 1 Final Study Report on Titan Aerial Daughtercraft

Saturns giant moon Titan has become one of the most fascinating bodies in the Solar System. Even though it is a billion miles from Earth, data from the Cassini mission reveals that Titan has a very diverse, Earth-like surface, with mountains, fluvial channels, lakes, evaporite basins, plains, dunes, and seas [Lopes 2010] (Figure 1). But unlike Earth, Titans surface likely is composed of organic chemistry products derived from complex atmospheric photochemistry [Lorenz 2008]. In addition, Titan has an active meteorological system with observed storms and precipitation-induced surface darkening suggesting a hydrocarbon cycle analogous to Earths water cycle [Turtle 2011].Titan is the richest laboratory in the solar system for studying prebiotic chemistry, which makes studying its chemistry from the surface and in the atmosphere one of the most important objectives in planetary science [Decadal 2011]. The diversity of surface features on Titan related to organic solids and liquids makes long-range mobility with surface access important [Decadal 2011]. This has not been possible to date, because mission concepts have had either no mobility (landers), no surface access (balloons and airplanes), or low maturity, high risk, and/or high development costs for this environment (e,g. large, self-sufficient, long-duration helicopters). Enabling in situ mobility could revolutionize Titan exploration, similarly to the way rovers revolutionized Mars exploration. Recent progress on several fronts has suggested that small-scale rotorcraft deployed as daughtercraft from a lander or balloon mothercraft may be an effective, affordable approach to expanding Titan surface access. This includes rapid progress on autonomous navigation capabilities of such aircraft for terrestrial applications and on miniaturization, driven by the consumer mobile electronics market, of high performance of sensors, processors, and other avionics components needed for such aircraft. Chemical analysis, for example with a mass spectrometer, will be important to any Titan surface mission. Anticipating that it may be more practical to host chemical analysis instruments on a mothership than a daughtercraft, we defined system and mission concepts that deploy a small rotorcraft, termed a Titan Aerial Daughtercraft (TAD), from a lander or balloon to perform high-resolution imaging and mapping, potentially land to acquire microscopic images or other in situ measurements, and acquire samples to return to analytical instruments on the mothership. In principle, the ability to recharge batteries in TAD from a radioisotope or other long-lived power source on the mothership could enable multiple sorties. For a lander-based mission, a variety of landing sites is conceivable, including near lake margins, in dry lake beds, or in regions of plains, dunes, or putative cryovolanic or impact melt features. Such missions may require landing with greater precision than in previous missions (Huygens) and mission studies; this could also enhance the ability of TAD to reach interesting terrain from the landing site. Precision descent may also benefit balloon missions, with or without a daughtercraft, by increasing the probability that the balloon will drift over desired terrain early in its mission. Given these potential benefits, the overall concept studied here includes brief consideration of precision descent for landing or balloon deployment, followed by one or more sorties by a rotorcraft deployed from the mothership, with the ability to return to the mothership.

[1]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Optimizing science return from Titan aerial explorers , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[2]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Flight Power Scaling of Airplanes, Airships, and Helicopters: Application to Planetary Exploration , 2001 .

[3]  B. Rizk,et al.  The Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer (DISR) Experiment on the Huygens Entry Probe of Titan , 2002 .

[4]  Mike McHenry,et al.  Detecting water hazards for autonomous off-road navigation , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  An overview of the descent and landing of the Huygens probe on Titan , 2005, Nature.

[6]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Vision Guided Landing of an Autonomous Helicopter in Hazardous Terrain , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  R. Prakash,et al.  Design of a long endurance Titan VTOL vehicle , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[8]  Stefan E. Schröder,et al.  DISR imaging and the geometry of the descent of the Huygens probe within Titan's atmosphere , 2007 .

[9]  Randolph L. Kirk,et al.  Distribution and interplay of geologic processes on Titan from Cassini radar data , 2010 .

[10]  R. Lorenz Titan Bumblebee: A 1kg Lander-Launched UAV Concept , 2008 .

[11]  R. Kirk,et al.  Titan's inventory of organic surface materials , 2008 .

[12]  Aerovironment Raven,et al.  Titan Bumblebee: a 1 Kg Lander-launched Uav Concept , 2008 .

[13]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Terrain Adaptive Navigation for planetary rovers , 2009, J. Field Robotics.

[14]  Stewart Sherrit,et al.  Self-contained harpoon and sample handling device for a remote platform , 2009, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[15]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Multi-modal image registration for localization in Titan's atmosphere , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  Stergios I. Roumeliotis,et al.  Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation for Spacecraft Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  S. Debei,et al.  AEROBOT AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATION AND MAPPING FORPLANETARY EXPLORATION , 2009 .

[18]  Jonathan L. Mitchell,et al.  AVIATR—Aerial Vehicle for In-situ and Airborne Titan Reconnaissance , 2010 .

[19]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  Compact beam scanning 240GHz radar for navigation and collision avoidance , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Daytime water detection based on sky reflections , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  Anastasios I. Mourikis,et al.  Real-time motion tracking on a cellphone using inertial sensing and a rolling-shutter camera , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  James Savage,et al.  Flight Test Results for Autonomous Obstacle Field Navigation and Landing Site Selection on the RASCAL JUH-60A , 2013 .

[23]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Monocular Vision for Long‐term Micro Aerial Vehicle State Estimation: A Compendium , 2013, J. Field Robotics.

[24]  Roland Brockers,et al.  Computer Vision for Micro Air Vehicles , 2014 .

[25]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Collision Avoidance for Quadrotors with a Monocular Camera , 2014, ISER.

[26]  J. Balaram,et al.  FIXED AND ROTARY WING FLIGHT OF SMALL AIR VEHICLES ON MARS, VENUS, AND TITAN. , 2014 .

[27]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  IMU Preintegration on Manifold for Efficient Visual-Inertial Maximum-a-Posteriori Estimation , 2015, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[28]  Flavio Fontana,et al.  Continuous on-board monocular-vision-based elevation mapping applied to autonomous landing of micro aerial vehicles , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[29]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Quadrotor Kinematics and Dynamics , 2015 .

[30]  R. Lorenz,et al.  Twilight on Ligeia: Implications of communications geometry and seasonal winds for exploring Titan’s seas 2020–2040 , 2015 .

[31]  Sebastian Scherer,et al.  Autonomous Exploration and Motion Planning for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Navigating Rivers , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[32]  Michael Bosse,et al.  Keyframe-based visual–inertial odometry using nonlinear optimization , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[33]  Jörg Stückler,et al.  Multilayered Mapping and Navigation for Autonomous Micro Aerial Vehicles , 2016, J. Field Robotics.

[34]  David Henriquez High Performance Spaceflight Computing (HPSC) , 2016 .