Smart City Governance and Children’s Agency: An Assessment of the Green Infrastructure Impact on Children’s Activities in Cagliari (Italy) with the Tool “Opportunities for Children in Urban Spaces (OCUS)”

The increases in urbanization, pollution, resource depletion, and climate change underline the need for urban planning policies that incorporate blue–green infrastructure (BGI) and ecosystem services. This paper proposes a framework for assessing BGI’s effect on children’s outdoor activities. This effect, called meaningful usefulness, is a central issue due to the influence of experiences with nature on children’s development and the global trend of concentration of children in urban areas. Based on the concept of affordance, the methodology formalizes meaningful usefulness in terms of an index of usefulness of individual settings (IUIS) and a synthetic index of usefulness of BGI in a specific area (ISGI). These are determined via an audit protocol, Opportunities for Children in Urban Spaces (OCUS), which incorporates a set of indicators measuring micro-scale properties of individual places and contextual macro-scale factors. The methodology is applied to BGI components in Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy, which was selected for its superior density of urban green spaces. The application of the OCUS tool confirms its usefulness for investigating functional affordances incorporated into the trans-scalar structures of BGIs. The analytic protocol further contributes to the implementation of urban planning strategies within the smart city paradigm.

[1]  Mohammad Taleai,et al.  Spatial multi-criteria and multi-scale evaluation of walkability potential at street segment level: A case study of tehran , 2017 .

[2]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Can the Neighborhood Built Environment Make a Difference in Children's Development? Building the Research Agenda to Create Evidence for Place-Based Children's Policy. , 2016, Academic pediatrics.

[3]  Alfonso Annunziata,et al.  A Methodological Framework for Assessing Practicability of the Urban Space: The Survey on Conditions of Practicable Environments (SCOPE) Procedure Applied in the Case Study of Cagliari (Italy) , 2018, Sustainability.

[4]  Bo Jellesmark Thorsen,et al.  Trade-off analysis of ecosystem service provision in nature networks , 2017 .

[5]  C. C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch,et al.  Affordances of outdoor settings for children in preschool: revisiting heft’s functional taxonomy , 2017 .

[6]  M. Dennis,et al.  Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens : exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level , 2017 .

[7]  S. Lai,et al.  Green infrastructure and ecological corridors: a regional study concerning Sardinia , 2018 .

[8]  Marketta Kyttä,et al.  Child-friendly urban structures: Bullerby revisited , 2013 .

[9]  A. Schuit,et al.  Environmental determinants of outdoor play in children: a large-scale cross-sectional study. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  R. Hart,et al.  Children's experience of place , 1979 .

[11]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[12]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[13]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Children’s independence and affordances experienced in the context of public open spaces: a study of diverse inner-city and suburban neighbourhoods in Auckland, New Zealand , 2019 .

[14]  Kevin Manaugh,et al.  Eyes on the alley: children’s appropriation of alley space in Riverdale, Toronto , 2019 .

[15]  Melody Oliver,et al.  Children as urbanites: mapping the affordances and behavior settings of urban environments for Finnish and Japanese children , 2018 .

[16]  Jacqueline Kerr,et al.  Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale for Youth (NEWS-Y): reliability and relationship with physical activity. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[17]  C. Stendler One Boy's Day: A Specimen Record of Behavior. , 1952 .

[18]  Carolyn Whitzman,et al.  Creating Child-Friendly High-Rise Environments: Beyond Wastelands and Glasshouses , 2012 .

[19]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Reorientation and Landmark-Guided Search by Young Children , 2006, Psychological science.

[20]  K. Wallace Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions , 2007 .

[21]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Measuring Physical Environments of Parks and Playgrounds: EAPRS Instrument Development and Inter-Rater Reliability. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[22]  A. Sen,et al.  Capability and Well-Being , 1991 .

[23]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Does the walkability of neighbourhoods affect children's independent mobility, independent of parental, socio-cultural and individual factors? , 2014 .

[24]  Rik Leemans,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[25]  R. Barker,et al.  Midwest and its children: the psychological ecology of an American town. , 1954 .

[26]  C. Raymond,et al.  A Framework to Assess Where and How Children Connect to Nature , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[27]  M. Kyttä The extent of children's independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments , 2004 .

[28]  R. Cordovil,et al.  Independent Mobility and Social Affordances of Places for Urban Neighborhoods: A Youth-Friendly Perspective , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[29]  S. P. Tjallingii,et al.  Planning with water and traffic networks. Carrying structures of the urban landscape , 2015 .

[30]  Carl Binning,et al.  Natural Assets: An Inventory of Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Goulburn Broken Catchment , 2001 .

[31]  Rui A. R. Ramos,et al.  Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: the case of Oporto , 2018 .

[32]  Judy Gillespie,et al.  Being and becoming: Writing children into planning theory , 2013 .

[33]  Maria Nordström,et al.  Children’s Views on Child-friendly Environments in Different Geographical, Cultural and Social Neighbourhoods , 2010 .

[34]  A. Broberg,et al.  Urban Environment and Children's Active Lifestyle: SoftGIS Revealing Children's Behavioral Patterns and Meaningful Places , 2012, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[35]  A. Rigolon,et al.  A QUality INdex of Parks for Youth (QUINPY): Evaluating urban parks through geographic information systems , 2018 .

[36]  Harry Heft,et al.  Affordances of children's environments: A functional approach to environmental description. , 1988 .

[37]  Louise Chawla,et al.  Benefits of Nature Contact for Children , 2015 .

[38]  Linda Jones,et al.  Children in the urban environment: an issue for the new public health agenda , 1996 .

[39]  S. Teitelbaum,et al.  Associations between neighborhood resources and physical activity in inner-city minority children. , 2013, Academic pediatrics.

[40]  G. Daily Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[41]  D. McAdams,et al.  Environmentalism as a context for expressing identity and generativity: patterns among activists and uninvolved youth and midlife adults. , 2012, Journal of personality.

[42]  F. Moura,et al.  Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon , 2017 .

[43]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Social and built‐environment factors related to children's independent mobility: The importance of neighbourhood cohesion and connectedness , 2017, Health & place.

[44]  Byungho Min,et al.  Children's neighborhood place as a psychological and behavioral domain , 2006 .

[45]  M. Mears,et al.  Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services , 2015 .

[46]  Chiara Garau,et al.  An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Strategic Spatial Planning: A Study of Sardinian Municipalities , 2016 .

[47]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Public open space desktop auditing tool—Establishing appropriateness for use in Australian regional and urban settings , 2016 .

[48]  Francesco Tonucci Citizen Child: Play as Welfare Parameter for Urban Life , 2005 .

[49]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[50]  Marketta Kyttä,et al.  Affordances and Independent Mobility in the Assessment of Environmental Child Friendliness , 2003 .

[51]  Noora Pyyry,et al.  Thinking with broken glass: making pedagogical spaces of enchantment in the city , 2017, Urban Nature and Childhoods.

[52]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[53]  Susan M. Goltsman,et al.  Raising “Free Range Kids”: Creating Neighborhood Parks that Promote Environmental Stewardship , 2009 .

[54]  C. Garau,et al.  Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities , 2018 .

[55]  Karen Witten,et al.  Children’s everyday encounters and affective relations with place: experiences of hyperdiversity in Auckland neighbourhoods , 2019 .

[56]  Ronald Wiedenhaft Cities for People , 1981 .

[57]  Arnaldo Cecchini,et al.  Evaluating walkability: a capability-wise planning and design support system , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[58]  R. Loomes,et al.  Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems , 2000 .

[59]  D. Lang,et al.  Leverage points for sustainability transformation , 2017, Ambio.

[60]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[61]  B. Fagan-Watson,et al.  Children's Independent Mobility: an international comparison and recommendations for action , 2015 .