Optimal bandpass filters for time-domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

The optimal bandpass filter for signal averaging of the surface QRS complex to detect late potentials is undefined. A study was conducted in 87 patients; 25 (mean age 34 +/- 10 years) were normal (group I), 29 (60 +/- 20 years) had organic heart disease without ventricular tachycardia (group II) and 33 (62 +/- 15 years) had sustained ventricular tachycardia (group III). In all patients signal-averaged electrocardiography (200 beats) was performed using a sharp, bidirectional filter and data analyzed using the following 7 high-pass filter settings: 10, 15, 20, 25, 40, 80 and 100 Hz. For each filter the duration of the signal-averaged QRS complex, the low-amplitude signals of less than 40 microV and the root-mean-square voltage of the terminal 40 ms (RMS-40) were determined. Normal values for each filter were determined from group I patients. In all 3 groups, quantitative signal-averaged variables were filter dependent. There was a progressive and marked decrease in RMS-40 and a progressive and marked increase in low-amplitude signal duration as the high-pass filtering was increased from 10 to 100 Hz. In contrast, high-pass, filter-dependent changes in signal-averaged QRS duration were less marked. The sensitivity and specificity for each filter using RMS-40 as the index of late potentials in separating group III patients from group II patients were: 10 Hz-64% and 52%; 15 Hz-57% and 72%; 20 Hz-57% and 76%; 25 Hz-42% and 90%; 40 Hz-61% and 83%; 80 Hz-88% and 69%; and 100 Hz-79% and 62%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  A H Harken,et al.  Relation between late potentials on the body surface and directly recorded fragmented electrograms in patients with ventricular tachycardia. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  P. Walter,et al.  Influence of left ventricular function on signal averaged late potentials in patients with coronary artery disease with and without ventricular tachycardia. , 1985, American heart journal.

[3]  P. Denes,et al.  Quantitative Analsis of the High‐frequency Components of the Terminal Portion of the Body Surface QRS in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 1983, Circulation.

[4]  D. Mortara,et al.  Body Surface Detection of Delayed Depolarizations in Patients with Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia and Left Ventricular Aneurysm , 1981, Circulation.

[5]  R Lazzara,et al.  Recording from the body surface of arrhythmogenic ventricular activity during the S-T segment. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  J. Machac,et al.  Relation of late potentials to ejection fraction and wall motion abnormalities in acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  S. Winters,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Signal Averaging of the Surface QRS Complex and Signal Averaging of Intracardiac and Epicardial Recordings in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  J A Gomes,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the high-frequency components of the signal-averaged QRS complex in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study. , 1985, Circulation.

[9]  J A Gomes,et al.  Late Potentials and Arrhythmogenesis * , 1985, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  M. Simson.  Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[11]  M. Josephson,et al.  Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, and cardiac catheterization. , 1984, Circulation.