A quantitative framework to group nanoscale and microscale particles by hazard potency to derive occupational exposure limits: Proof of concept evaluation

&NA; The large and rapidly growing number of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) presents a challenge to assessing the potential occupational health risks. An initial database of 25 rodent studies including 1929 animals across various experimental designs and material types was constructed to identify materials that are similar with respect to their potency in eliciting neutrophilic pulmonary inflammation, a response relevant to workers. Doses were normalized across rodent species, strain, and sex as the estimated deposited particle mass dose per gram of lung. Doses associated with specific measures of pulmonary inflammation were estimated by modeling the continuous dose‐response relationships using benchmark dose modeling. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify similar materials. The 18 nanoscale and microscale particles were classified into four potency groups, which varied by factors of approximately two to 100. Benchmark particles microscale TiO2 and crystalline silica were in the lowest and highest potency groups, respectively. Random forest methods were used to identify the important physicochemical predictors of pulmonary toxicity, and group assignments were correctly predicted for five of six new ENMs. Proof‐of‐concept was demonstrated for this framework. More comprehensive data are needed for further development and validation for use in deriving categorical occupational exposure limits. HighlightsQuantitative framework to group nanoscale and microscale particles by hazard potency.Dose‐response modeling and clustering of rodent pulmonary inflammation data.Hazard group prediction by physicochemical properties using random forest method.Proof‐of‐concept demonstrated while recognizing the need for more comprehensive data.

[1]  P. Biswas,et al.  Concept of Assessing Nanoparticle Hazards Considering Nanoparticle Dosemetric and Chemical/Biological Response Metrics , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[2]  Lirong Zheng,et al.  Species-specific toxicity of ceria nanoparticles to Lactuca plants , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[3]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A weight of evidence approach for hazard screening of engineered nanomaterials , 2014, Nanotoxicology.

[4]  Christoph Studer,et al.  Sameness: The regulatory crux with nanomaterial identity and grouping schemes for hazard assessment. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  QSAR modeling of nanomaterials. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[7]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making. , 2015, ACS nano.

[8]  Khara Grieger,et al.  A relative ranking approach for nano-enabled applications to improve risk-based decision making: a case study of Army materiel , 2014, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[9]  Jeremy M. Gernand,et al.  Nanoparticle Characteristic Interaction Effects on Pulmonary Toxicity: A Random Forest Modeling Framework to Compare Risks of Nanomaterial Variants , 2016 .

[10]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  IMMUNE BIOMARKERS IN RELATION TO EXPOSURE TO PARTICULATE MATTER: A Cross-Sectional Survey in 17 Cities of Central Europe , 2000, Inhalation toxicology.

[11]  Daniel Aschwanden,et al.  Development of The Structure , 2017 .

[12]  Teresa F. Fernandes,et al.  The MARINA Risk Assessment Strategy: A Flexible Strategy for Efficient Information Collection and Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  K. Donaldson,et al.  Inhalation of poorly soluble particles. II. Influence Of particle surface area on inflammation and clearance. , 2000, Inhalation toxicology.

[14]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[15]  Hedwig M Braakhuis,et al.  Grouping nanomaterials to predict their potential to induce pulmonary inflammation. , 2016, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[16]  Kristine Krajnak,et al.  Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Responses of Rats to Inhalation of Silver Nanoparticles , 2013, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[17]  J. Everitt,et al.  Pulmonary responses of mice, rats, and hamsters to subchronic inhalation of ultrafine titanium dioxide particles. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[18]  A. Nel,et al.  Interlaboratory Evaluation of Rodent Pulmonary Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  Robert Gelein,et al.  Equivalent titanium dioxide nanoparticle deposition by intratracheal instillation and whole body inhalation: the effect of dose rate on acute respiratory tract inflammation , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[20]  Raluca Mihalache,et al.  Occupational exposure limits for manufactured nanomaterials, a systematic review , 2017, Nanotoxicology.

[21]  Chao Chen,et al.  Using Random Forest to Learn Imbalanced Data , 2004 .

[22]  Mark S V Maier,et al.  Setting occupational exposure limits for unstudied pharmaceutical intermediates using an in vitro parallelogram approach , 2011, Toxicology mechanisms and methods.

[23]  P. Morrow,et al.  Possible mechanisms to explain dust overloading of the lungs. , 1988, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[24]  J. Pauluhn Subchronic inhalation toxicity of iron oxide (magnetite, Fe3O4) in rats: pulmonary toxicity is determined by the particle kinetics typical of poorly soluble particles , 2012, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[25]  K. Norén,et al.  Occupational exposure , 1996, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[26]  David B Warheit,et al.  Long-term pulmonary responses of three laboratory rodent species to subchronic inhalation of pigmentary titanium dioxide particles. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[27]  Jeremy M. Gernand,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Carbon Nanotube Pulmonary Toxicity Studies—How Physical Dimensions and Impurities Affect the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  V. Castranova,et al.  Progression of lung inflammation and damage in rats after cessation of silica inhalation. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  Annie M Jarabek,et al.  Dosimetric Adjustments for Interspecies Extrapolation of Inhaled Poorly Soluble Particles (PSP) , 2005, Inhalation toxicology.

[30]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. , 2012, ACS nano.

[31]  A. Maier,et al.  The Scientific Basis of Uncertainty Factors Used in Setting Occupational Exposure Limits , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[32]  Feng Yang,et al.  Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotube surface modification on bioactivity in the C57BL/6 mouse model , 2014, Nanotoxicology.

[33]  P. A. Schulte,et al.  Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[34]  N. Wu,et al.  Kriging-Based Design of Experiments for Multi-Source Exposure–Response Studies in Nanotoxicology , 2017 .

[35]  Robert Gelein,et al.  Effects of subchronically inhaled carbon black in three species. I. Retention kinetics, lung inflammation, and histopathology. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[36]  Enrico Burello,et al.  Profiling the biological activity of oxide nanomaterials with mechanistic models , 2013 .

[37]  Paul A Schulte,et al.  Workshop report: strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[38]  Jürgen Pauluhn,et al.  Poorly soluble particulates: searching for a unifying denominator of nanoparticles and fine particles for DNEL estimation. , 2011, Toxicology.

[39]  A J Bailer,et al.  Lung Dosimetry and Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles: Evaluating and Extending Current Models in Rats and Humans , 2006, Inhalation toxicology.

[40]  V. Ferrans,et al.  Interstitial lung disease: current concepts of pathogenesis, staging and therapy. , 1981, The American journal of medicine.

[41]  Mohammad Wahid Ansari,et al.  The legal status of in vitro embryos , 2014 .

[42]  Claudia Röhl,et al.  Manufactured nanomaterials: categorization and approaches to hazard assessment , 2014, Archives of Toxicology.

[43]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  An in vitro alveolar macrophage assay for predicting the short-term inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials , 2016, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[44]  Enrico Burello,et al.  Proposal for a risk banding framework for inhaled low aspect ratio nanoparticles based on physicochemical properties , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[45]  Otmar Schmid,et al.  Surface area is the biologically most effective dose metric for acute nanoparticle toxicity in the lung , 2016 .

[46]  K S Crump,et al.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1984, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[47]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[48]  C. L. Tran,et al.  Concordance Between In Vitro and In Vivo Dosimetry in the Proinflammatory Effects of Low-Toxicity, Low-Solubility Particles: The Key Role of the Proximal Alveolar Region , 2008 .

[49]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Grouping and Read-Across Approaches for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[50]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[51]  Reinhard Kreiling,et al.  Case studies putting the decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into practice. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[52]  B D Naumann,et al.  Performance-based exposure control limits for pharmaceutical active ingredients. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[53]  M. O’Reilly,et al.  Pulmonary chemokine and mutagenic responses in rats after subchronic inhalation of amorphous and crystalline silica. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[54]  J. Nakanishi,et al.  Comparative pulmonary toxicity study of nano-TiO(2) particles of different sizes and agglomerations in rats: different short- and long-term post-instillation results. , 2009, Toxicology.

[55]  Meiying Wang,et al.  Use of a pro-fibrogenic mechanism-based predictive toxicological approach for tiered testing and decision analysis of carbonaceous nanomaterials. , 2015, ACS nano.

[56]  P. Morrow,et al.  Pulmonary response to toner upon chronic inhalation exposure in rats. , 1991, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[57]  Andrew Williams,et al.  Nano-risk Science: application of toxicogenomics in an adverse outcome pathway framework for risk assessment of multi-walled carbon nanotubes , 2015, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[58]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[59]  G. Raghu,et al.  The effects of chronic bronchitis and chronic air-flow obstruction on lung cell populations recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage. , 1985, The American review of respiratory disease.

[60]  Igor L. Medintz,et al.  Meta-analysis of cellular toxicity for cadmium-containing quantum dots. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[61]  P. Schulte,et al.  Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: state of the art , 2010 .

[62]  T. Xia,et al.  Development of structure-activity relationship for metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[63]  Lang Tran,et al.  ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[64]  Peter Morfeld,et al.  Translational toxicology in setting occupational exposure limits for dusts and hazard classification – a critical evaluation of a recent approach to translate dust overload findings from rats to humans , 2015, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[65]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  A multi-stakeholder perspective on the use of alternative test strategies for nanomaterial safety assessment. , 2013, ACS nano.

[66]  Stephen S. Olin,et al.  THE RELEVANCE OF THE RAT LUNG RESPONSE TO PARTICLE OVERLOAD FOR HUMAN RISK ASSESSMENT: A Workshop Consensus Report , 2000, Inhalation toxicology.

[67]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  Nanotechnology: Health and Environmental Risks , 2008 .

[68]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Demonstration of a modelling-based multi-criteria decision analysis procedure for prioritisation of occupational risks from manufactured nanomaterials , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[69]  R A Ford,et al.  Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[70]  K. Crump,et al.  Critical issues in benchmark calculations from continuous data. , 2002, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[71]  Lung-Chi Chen,et al.  Computational modeling of nanoscale and microscale particle deposition, retention and dosimetry in the mouse respiratory tract , 2014, Inhalation toxicology.

[72]  D. Krewski,et al.  The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits—Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[73]  A. Nel,et al.  Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Small.

[74]  Fred A. Wright,et al.  Standardizing Benchmark Dose Calculations to Improve Science-Based Decisions in Human Health Assessments , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[75]  A. Mitropoulos,et al.  A framework for health-related nanomaterial grouping. , 2017, Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects.

[76]  Thomas A. Louis,et al.  The Future Use of in Vitro Data in Risk Assessment to Set Human Exposure Standards: Challenging Problems and Familiar Solutions , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[77]  D. Landsittel,et al.  Time course of pulmonary response of rats to inhalation of crystalline silica: histological results and biochemical indices of damage, lipidosis, and fibrosis. , 2001, Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer.

[78]  Robert Gelein,et al.  Increased Pulmonary Toxicity of Inhaled Ultrafine Particles: Due to Lung Overload Alone? , 1994 .

[79]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article Conditional variable importance for random forests , 2008 .

[80]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  A New Stochastic Kriging Method for Modeling Multi-Source Exposure–Response Data in Toxicology Studies , 2014, ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering.

[81]  Ord,et al.  Benchmark Dose Software (BMDS) , 2015 .

[82]  J. Pauluhn Derivation of occupational exposure levels (OELs) of Low-toxicity isometric biopersistent particles: how can the kinetic lung overload paradigm be used for improved inhalation toxicity study design and OEL-derivation? , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[83]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  Interlaboratory Evaluation of in Vitro Cytotoxicity and Inflammatory Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[84]  Y. Cohen,et al.  In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[85]  M. A. Al-Bayati,et al.  Regional Deposition of Inhaled Monodisperse Coarse and Fine Aerosol Particles in Small Laboratory Animals , 1988 .

[86]  Lisa M. Sweeney,et al.  Advances in Inhalation Dosimetry Models and Methods for Occupational Risk Assessment and Exposure Limit Derivation , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[87]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Decreased dissolution of ZnO by iron doping yields nanoparticles with reduced toxicity in the rodent lung and zebrafish embryos. , 2011, ACS nano.

[88]  Feng Yang,et al.  Differential mouse pulmonary dose and time course responses to titanium dioxide nanospheres and nanobelts. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[89]  W. MacNee,et al.  The pro-inflammatory effects of low-toxicity low-solubility particles, nanoparticles and fine particles, on epithelial cells in vitro: the role of surface area , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[90]  A. Zuckerman,et al.  IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans , 1995, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[91]  Christian Micheletti,et al.  Weight of Evidence approach for the relative hazard ranking of nanomaterials , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[92]  W. Rom Relationship of inflammatory cell cytokines to disease severity in individuals with occupational inorganic dust exposure. , 1991, American journal of industrial medicine.