Decision support towards agile eco-design of microreaction processes by accompanying (simplified) life cycle assessment

Continuously running syntheses in microstructured reactors offers novel ways to intensify conventional chemical processes. An outstanding advantage of microreaction technology is the high surface-to-volume-ratio which enables intensive mixing phenomena as well as high mass and heat transfer rates. Thus, microstructured reactors may be a suitable means to improve multiphase reactions by increasing the interfacial area and the intensification of internal mixing. This improvement in reaction performances may lead to reduced environmental burdens of the process under consideration. The method of simplified life cycle assessment (SLCA) is a suitable tool to evaluate the environmental burdens caused by chemical processes. It has been applied already in research and development to identify the key parameters for a deliberate green process design of two biphasic reactions, the esterification of phenol and benzoyl chloride resulting in phenyl benzoate and the synthesis of one of the corresponding phase transfer catalysts, [BMIM]Cl. Further, SLCA is complemented by a simple cost estimation to investigate the main cost drivers relevant for possible industrial application of the syntheses investigated.

[1]  Holger Löwe,et al.  Aqueous Kolbe−Schmitt Synthesis Using Resorcinol in a Microreactor Laboratory Rig under High-p,T Conditions , 2005 .

[2]  Jean-Claude Charpentier,et al.  In the frame of globalization and sustainability, process intensification, a path to the future of chemical and process engineering (molecules into money) , 2007 .

[3]  Jeremy L. Steinbacher,et al.  Greener approaches to organic synthesis using microreactor technology. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[4]  K. Jensen,et al.  Multiphase microfluidics: from flow characteristics to chemical and materials synthesis. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[5]  Julie Zimmerman,et al.  Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[6]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an ionic liquid versus molecular solvents and their applications. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Faisal Khan,et al.  E-Green − A Robust Risk-Based Environmental Assessment Tool for Process Industries , 2007 .

[8]  Dana Kralisch,et al.  Evaluating the greenness of alternative reaction media , 2008 .

[9]  D. Kralisch,et al.  Implementing objectives of sustainability into ionic liquids research and development , 2007 .

[10]  Volker H. Hoffmann,et al.  Multiobjective Screening and Evaluation of Chemical Process Technologies , 2001 .

[11]  Tak Hur,et al.  Simplified LCA and matrix methods in identifying the environmental aspects of a product system. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Evaluation and analysis of a proxy indicator for the estimation of gate-to-gate energy consumption in the early process design phases: The case of organic solvent production , 2010 .

[13]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Decision framework for chemical process design including different stages of environmental, health, and safety assessment , 2008 .

[14]  A. Jess,et al.  Kinetics of single- and two-phase synthesis of the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride , 2005 .

[15]  Annegret Stark,et al.  Microwave‐Assisted Kolbe‐Schmitt Synthesis Using Ionic Liquids or Dimcarb as Reactive Solvents , 2009 .

[16]  K. Jensen,et al.  Integrated continuous microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[17]  Wulf-Peter Schmidt,et al.  Iterative screening LCA in an eco-design tool , 1997 .

[18]  D. Agar,et al.  The capillary-microreactor: a new reactor concept for the intensification of heat and mass transfer in liquid–liquid reactions , 2003 .

[19]  Barry M. Trost,et al.  Atom Economy—A Challenge for Organic Synthesis: Homogeneous Catalysis Leads the Way , 1995 .

[20]  Nicole Pamme,et al.  Continuous flow separations in microfluidic devices. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[21]  Dana Kralisch,et al.  Assessment of the ecological potential of microreaction technology , 2007 .

[22]  Friedrich Hinterberger,et al.  FORUM: Dematerialization, MIPS and Factor 10 Physical sustainability indicators as a social device , 1999 .

[23]  T. Tagawa,et al.  Ultrasound-assisted phase transfer catalysis in a capillary microreactor , 2009 .

[24]  Arno P. Biwer,et al.  Prozesssimulation zur frühen ökologischen Bewertung biotechnologischer Prozesse: Beispiel Zitronensäure , 2001 .

[25]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[26]  David A Barrow,et al.  Liquid-liquid phase separation: characterisation of a novel device capable of separating particle carrying multiphase flows. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[27]  Masahiko Hirao,et al.  Decision support tools for process design and selection , 2002 .

[28]  Marco Eissen,et al.  Environmental performance metrics for daily use in synthetic chemistry. , 2002, Chemistry.

[29]  Volker Hessel,et al.  Sustainability through green processing – novel process windows intensify micro and milli process technologies , 2008 .

[30]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Assessing Safety, Health, and Environmental Impact Early during Process Development , 2000 .

[31]  Ulrich Kunz,et al.  Potenzialabschätzung der Mikroreaktionstechnik für den Einsatz in der Prozessentwicklung , 2005 .

[32]  Volker Hessel,et al.  Environmentally Benign Microreaction Process Design by Accompanying (Simplified) Life Cycle Assessment , 2009 .

[33]  Thomas E. Graedcl.  Weighted matrices as product life cycle assessment tools , 1996 .