Finite element predictions of cartilage contact mechanics in hips with retroverted acetabula.

BACKGROUND A contributory factor to hip osteoarthritis (OA) is abnormal cartilage mechanics. Acetabular retroversion, a version deformity of the acetabulum, has been postulated to cause OA via decreased posterior contact area and increased posterior contact stress. Although cartilage mechanics cannot be measured directly in vivo to evaluate the causes of OA, they can be predicted using finite element (FE) modeling. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare cartilage contact mechanics between hips with normal and retroverted acetabula using subject-specific FE modeling. METHODS Twenty subjects were recruited and imaged: 10 with normal acetabula and 10 with retroverted acetabula. FE models were constructed using a validated protocol. Walking, stair ascent, stair descent and rising from a chair were simulated. Acetabular cartilage contact stress and contact area were compared between groups. RESULTS Retroverted acetabula had superomedial cartilage contact patterns, while normal acetabula had widely distributed cartilage contact patterns. In the posterolateral acetabulum, average contact stress and contact area during walking and stair descent were 2.6-7.6 times larger in normal than retroverted acetabula (P ≤ 0.017). Conversely, in the superomedial acetabulum, peak contact stress during walking was 1.2-1.6 times larger in retroverted than normal acetabula (P ≤ 0.044). Further differences varied by region and activity. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated superomedial contact patterns in retroverted acetabula vs widely distributed contact patterns in normal acetabula. Smaller posterolateral contact stress in retroverted acetabula than in normal acetabula suggests that increased posterior contact stress alone may not be the link between retroversion and OA.

[1]  Michael D. Harris,et al.  The geometry and biomechanics of normal and pathomorphologic human hips , 2013 .

[2]  Kiran H. Shivanna,et al.  Cartilage contact pressure elevations in dysplastic hips: a chronic overload model , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[3]  Steven A Olson,et al.  The role of biomechanics and inflammation in cartilage injury and repair. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M. Naito,et al.  The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  C. Hutchinson,et al.  The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  Justin Cobb,et al.  Cams and Pincer Impingement Are Distinct, Not Mixed: The Acetabular Pathomorphology of Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  R Huiskes,et al.  The role of computational models in the search for the mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of articular cartilage. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Benjamin J. Ellis,et al.  Validation of finite element predictions of cartilage contact pressure in the human hip joint. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  R. Ganz,et al.  Anterior Femoro-Acetabular Impingement Due to Acetabular Retroversion: Treatment with Periacetabular Osteotomy , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  T. Brown,et al.  Baseline articular contact stress levels predict incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis development in the MOST cohort , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  H.W.J. Huiskes,et al.  Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology , 2005 .

[12]  M. Lamontagne,et al.  The effects of cam femoroacetabular impingement corrective surgery on lower-extremity gait biomechanics. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[13]  R. Richards,et al.  Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  L. Engesæter,et al.  Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. , 2011, Radiology.

[15]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  Physical validation of a patient-specific contact finite element model of the ankle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  A. Troelsen,et al.  Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  Whirley DYNA3D: A nonlinear, explicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics , 1993 .

[18]  R. Ganz,et al.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  R. Ganz,et al.  Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: High validity of the “cross‐over‐sign” , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Mechanical response of bovine articular cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression loading at physiological stress levels. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  F. J. Dzida,et al.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  R. Haut,et al.  Impact-induced fissuring of articular cartilage: an investigation of failure criteria. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  M Puso,et al.  NIKE3D a nonlinear, implicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics user's manual update summary , 1991 .

[24]  Stephen J Ferguson,et al.  The effects of impingement and dysplasia on stress distributions in the hip joint during sitting and walking: A finite element analysis , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  W. Barsoum,et al.  Relationship Between Proximal Femoral and Acetabular Alignment in Normal Hip Joints Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  I. Sharp ACETABULAR DYSPLASIA: The Acetabular Angle , 1961 .

[28]  William H. Harris,et al.  The Etiology of Osteoarthritis of the Hip , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  K. Klaue,et al.  Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  J. Weiss,et al.  An algorithmic approach to surgical decision making in acetabular retroversion. , 2011, Orthopedics.

[31]  M. Tannast,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Load transfer across the pelvic bone. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  R. Brand,et al.  Joint contact stress: a reasonable surrogate for biological processes? , 2005, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[34]  M. Bircher Retroversion of the acetabulum. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. , 2006, Radiology.

[36]  Mario Lamontagne,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement alters hip and pelvic biomechanics during gait Walking biomechanics of FAI. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[37]  Van C. Mow,et al.  Structure and function of articular cartilage and meniscus , 2005 .

[38]  Benjamin J. Ellis,et al.  Finite element prediction of cartilage contact stresses in normal human hips , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[39]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  R. Ganz,et al.  Effect of Pelvic Tilt on Acetabular Retroversion: A Study of Pelves From Cadavers , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  C. Larson Arthroscopic Management of Pincer-type Impingement , 2010, Sports medicine and arthroscopy review.

[42]  Marcy Wong,et al.  The mechanobiology of articular cartilage development and degeneration. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[43]  F. Guilak,et al.  Physical regulation of cartilage metabolism , 2005 .

[44]  R. Haut,et al.  Mechanical responses of the rabbit patello-femoral joint to blunt impact. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[45]  Benjamin J. Ellis,et al.  Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  G. Wiberg Shelf operation in congenital dysplasia of the acetabulum and in subluxation and dislocation of the hip. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[47]  D. Wenger,et al.  Surgical treatment of hip dysplasia in children and adolescents. , 2012, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[48]  J. Hunter,et al.  Multilevel Measurement of Acetabular Version Using 3-D CT-generated Models: Implications for Hip Preservation Surgery , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[49]  N. Giori,et al.  Acetabular Retroversion is Associated With Osteoarthritis of the Hip , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[50]  R. Richards,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL CT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE ACETABULAR RETROVERSION , 2010 .

[51]  Christopher L Peters,et al.  Correlation between radiographic measures of acetabular morphology with 3D femoral head coverage in patients with acetabular retroversion , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.