Prospective evaluation of bowel function and quality of life after colon cancer surgery – is it time for routine screening for late sequelae?

AIM Bowel dysfunction after colon cancer (CC) surgery is widely neglected in current follow up programmes. This study explored changes in bowel function and quality of life (QoL) from three (3 m) to twelve months (12 m) after surgery in CC patients undergoing right- or left-sided colon resection (RightSCR/LeftSCR) and investigated differences between the two groups 12 m after surgery. METHOD CC patients undergoing surgical resection in 2018-2020 at five surgical departments were included in this population-based prospective cohort study. Included patients completed electronic surveys consisting of a collection of validated scores 3 m and 12 m after surgery. RESULTS A total of 708 CC patients (423 RightSCR, 285 LeftSCR) were included. In RightSCR, no improvement was observed from 3 m to 12 m in most scores/items, on the contrary, symptom worsening in flatus- and faecal incontinence and urgency was observed (p < 0.05). Also, the proportion of patients rating their bowel function as very good/good decreased (p < 0.05) in this group. In LeftSCR improvement was found in flatus and faecal incontinence, urgency and night-time defaecation (p < 0.02), while no improvement was observed in the remaining scores/items. At 12 m, higher proportions of RightSCR than LeftSCR reported loose stools, incontinence and urgency (all p < 0.001), whereas LeftSCR more often reported hard stools and flatus incontinence (p < 0.05). Among all CC patients 18.3% reported bowel-related impairment of QoL at 12 m with no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION From 3 m to 12 m no significant change was observed in the majority of bowel function and QoL scores/items, however, some symptoms worsened in RightSCR, while a few improved in LeftSCR. Bowel dysfunction and impaired QoL were still common in both groups at 12 m, although the symptom pattern differed between the groups. These findings call for a systematic screening for bowel dysfunction to ensure early treatment of symptoms.

[1]  T. Juul,et al.  Coping strategies and considerations regarding low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life among patients with rectal cancer; a qualitative interview study , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[2]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Chronic loose stools following right‐sided hemicolectomy for colon cancer and the association with bile acid malabsorption and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth , 2022, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[3]  E. Furnée,et al.  Surviving rectal cancer at the cost of a colostomy: global survey of long-term health-related quality of life in 10 countries , 2022, BJS open.

[4]  J. Guillem,et al.  Quality of life and function after rectal cancer surgery with and without sphincter preservation , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[5]  L. Ventzel,et al.  Management of treatment‐related sequelae following colorectal cancer , 2022, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[6]  E. Furnée,et al.  Life with a stoma across five European countries—a cross-sectional study on long-term rectal cancer survivors , 2022, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[7]  C. Gudex,et al.  Danish population health measured by the EQ-5D-5L , 2021, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[8]  Yi Xiao,et al.  The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  J. Ijzermans,et al.  Actual survival after resection of primary colorectal cancer: results from a prospective multicenter study , 2021, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Differences in work participation between incident colon and rectal cancer patients—a 10-year follow-up study with matched controls , 2021, Journal of cancer survivorship.

[11]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Systematic screening for late sequelae after colorectal cancer—a feasibility study , 2021, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[12]  J. Burgerhof,et al.  Functional outcomes of surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Time for a paradigm shift in the follow‐up of colorectal cancer , 2020, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[14]  I. Gögenur,et al.  Validation of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk) database – on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group , 2020, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[15]  P. Lagergren,et al.  Prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome and impact on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: population‐based study , 2020, BJS open.

[16]  A. Gavin,et al.  Colon and rectal cancer survival in seven high-income countries 2010–2014: variation by age and stage at diagnosis (the ICBP SURVMARK-2 project) , 2020, Gut.

[17]  J. Reilly,et al.  Systematic review: the effect of right hemicolectomy for cancer on postoperative bowel function , 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[18]  S. Gill,et al.  Trends in the epidemiology of young-onset colorectal cancer: a worldwide systematic review , 2020, BMC Cancer.

[19]  A. Williams,et al.  Demographic trends in the incidence of young‐onset colorectal cancer: a population‐based study , 2020, The British journal of surgery.

[20]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Impact of bowel- and stoma dysfunction on Female sexuality after treatment for rectal cancer. , 2020, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[21]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Quality of life with or without sphincter preservation for rectal cancer , 2019, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[22]  V. Zadnik,et al.  Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years , 2019, Gut.

[23]  A. Martling,et al.  Low anterior resection syndrome after right‐ and left‐sided resections for colonic cancer , 2018, BJS open.

[24]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Bowel dysfunction after sigmoid resection for cancer and its impact on quality of life , 2018, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[26]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Chronic diarrhoea following surgery for colon cancer—frequency, causes and treatment options , 2018, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[27]  R. Kerstens,et al.  The PAC‐SYM questionnaire for chronic constipation: defining the minimal important difference , 2017, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[28]  A. Jackson,et al.  The efficacy of a low-fat diet to manage the symptoms of bile acid malabsorption – outcomes in patients previously treated for cancer , 2017, Clinical medicine.

[29]  K. Whelan,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Bristol Stool Form Scale in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome , 2016, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[30]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Chronic pain in the pelvic area or lower extremities after rectal cancer treatment and its impact on quality of life: a population-based cross-sectional study , 2015, Pain.

[31]  M. Schuurmans,et al.  Ostomy-related problems and their impact on quality of life of colorectal cancer ostomates: a systematic review , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[32]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Urinary and sexual dysfunction in women after resection with and without preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a population‐based cross‐sectional study , 2015, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[33]  M. Neary,et al.  Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer , 2010, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[34]  John E. Brazier,et al.  Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[35]  M. Kamm,et al.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems , 1999, Gut.

[36]  J. Virjee,et al.  Detection of pseudodiarrhoea by simple clinical assessment of intestinal transit rate. , 1990, BMJ.

[37]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, BJS Open.

[38]  L. Taylor,et al.  Psychometric validation of a constipation symptom assessment questionnaire. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.