Time and frequency-domain biomedical photoacoustic imaging: a comparative study

In this study, we compare the time-domain (pulsed laser) and frequency-domain (FD) photoacoustic (PA) imaging techniques with respect to their signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast and axial resolution. Experiments are performed using a dual-mode PA system and under the condition of maximum permissible exposure (MPE) for both methods. An analytical model of photoacoustic effect and a Krimholtz-Leedom-Matthaei (KLM) model for employed transducers are developed and used to analyze the experimental results. Experiments reveal that the contrast of the pulsed method suffers from the oscillating baseline and the resolution of the FD-PA is limited by the finite bandwidth as well as combining the in-phase and quadrature signals to generate the envelope signal; both are the requirements to maximize the SNR. It is shown that by increasing the laser power and decreasing the chirp duration within the safety limits, the SNR of the FD-PA method can be enhanced. Also it is demonstrated that the axial resolution of the FD method can be improved by combining its two channels; amplitude and phase. The improved resolution competes with the high resolution generated by pulsed technique.

[1]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  Xu Xiao Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2008 .

[3]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[4]  Wiendelt Steenbergen,et al.  The Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope: system overview and performance , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  G. Kino,et al.  The design of efficient broad-band piezoelectric transducers , 1978 .

[6]  F. Foster,et al.  The Improvement and Quantitative Assessment of B-Mode Images Produced by an Annular Array/Cone Hybrid , 1983 .

[7]  Changhuei Yang,et al.  Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics express.

[8]  Frank K. Tittel,et al.  Laser optoacoustic imaging for breast cancer diagnostics: limit of detection and comparison with x-ray and ultrasound imaging , 1997, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[9]  Andreas Mandelis,et al.  Photothermoacoustic imaging of biological tissues: maximum depth characterization comparison of time and frequency-domain measurements. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  F. M. van den Engh,et al.  Initial results of in vivo non-invasive cancer imaging in the human breast using near-infrared photoacoustics. , 2007, Optics express.

[11]  Dariusz Dobrowolski,et al.  Anterior segment imaging: Fourier‐domain optical coherence tomography versus time‐domain optical coherence tomography , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  A. Oraevsky,et al.  Wide-band acoustic pulse detection in opto-acoustic tomography system , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[13]  A. Oraevsky,et al.  Laser optoacoustic imaging system for detection of breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  Alexander A. Oraevsky,et al.  Ultimate sensitivity of time-resolved optoacoustic detection , 2000, BiOS.

[15]  J.A. Jensen,et al.  Clinical comparison of pulse and chirp excitation , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..

[16]  Andreas Mandelis,et al.  Photoacoustic radar imaging signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, and resolution enhancement using nonlinear chirp modulation. , 2010, Optics letters.

[17]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging of biological tissue with intensity-modulated continuous-wave laser. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  T. Rhyne Characterizing ultrasonic transducers using radiation efficiency and reception noise figure , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  R. Krimholtz,et al.  New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers , 1970 .

[20]  Geng Ku,et al.  Deeply penetrating photoacoustic tomography in biological tissues enhanced with an optical contrast agent. , 2005, Optics letters.

[21]  R. Cobbold Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound , 2006 .

[22]  Andreas Mandelis,et al.  Three-dimensional photothermoacoustic depth-profilometric imaging by use of a linear frequency sweep lock-in heterodyne method , 2004, SPIE BiOS.

[23]  Andreas Mandelis,et al.  Fourier-domain biophotoacoustic subsurface depth selective amplitude and phase imaging of turbid phantoms and biological tissue. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.