Artificial intelligence-derived 3-Way Concentration-dependent Antagonism of Gatifloxacin, Pyrazinamide, and Rifampicin During Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Background In the experimental arm of the OFLOTUB trial, gatifloxacin replaced ethambutol in the standard 4-month regimen for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. The study included a nested pharmacokinetic (PK) study. We sought to determine if PK variability played a role in patient outcomes. Methods Patients recruited in the trial were followed for 24 months, and relapse ascertained using spoligotyping. Blood was drawn for drug concentrations on 2 separate days during the first 2 months of therapy, and compartmental PK analyses was performed. Failure to attain sustained sputum culture conversion at the end of treatment, relapse, or death during follow-up defined therapy failure. In addition to standard statistical analyses, we utilized an ensemble of machine-learning methods to identify patterns and predictors of therapy failure from among 27 clinical and laboratory features. Results Of 126 patients, 95 (75%) had favorable outcomes and 19 (15%) failed therapy, relapsed, or died. Pyrazinamide and rifampicin peak concentrations and area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) were ranked higher (more important) than gatifloxacin AUCs. The distribution of individual drug concentrations and their ranking varied significantly between South African and West African trial sites; however, drug concentrations still accounted for 31% and 75% of variance of outcomes, respectively. We identified a 3-way antagonistic interaction of pyrazinamide, gatifloxacin, and rifampicin concentrations. These negative interactions disappeared if rifampicin peak concentration was above 7 mg/L. Conclusions Concentration-dependent antagonism contributed to death, relapse, and therapy failure but was abrogated by high rifampicin concentrations. Therefore, increasing both rifampin and gatifloxacin doses could improve outcomes. Clinical Trials Registration NCT002216385.

[1]  D. Deshpande,et al.  Efficacy Versus Hepatotoxicity of High-dose Rifampin, Pyrazinamide, and Moxifloxacin to Shorten Tuberculosis Therapy Duration: There Is Still Fight in the Old Warriors Yet! , 2018, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  S. Heysell,et al.  Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics, Dosing, Susceptibility Breakpoints, and Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. , 2018, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  K. Dheda,et al.  Antibacterial and Sterilizing Effect of Benzylpenicillin in Tuberculosis , 2017, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  J. Alffenaar,et al.  Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic science. , 2017, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[5]  E. Wakeland,et al.  Linezolid Dose That Maximizes Sterilizing Effect While Minimizing Toxicity and Resistance Emergence for Tuberculosis , 2017, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  P. Olliaro,et al.  Effects on the QT Interval of a Gatifloxacin-Containing Regimen versus Standard Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis , 2017, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[7]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Concentration-Dependent Antagonism and Culture Conversion in Pulmonary Tuberculosis , 2017, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  S. Swaminathan,et al.  Drug Concentration Thresholds Predictive of Therapy Failure and Death in Children With Tuberculosis: Bread Crumb Trails in Random Forests , 2016, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  S. Swaminathan,et al.  Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo , 2016, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  W. Bishai,et al.  The Non-Linear Child: Ontogeny, Isoniazid Concentration, and NAT2 Genotype Modulate Enzyme Reaction Kinetics and Metabolism , 2016, EBioMedicine.

[11]  S. Swaminathan,et al.  A Long-term Co-perfused Disseminated Tuberculosis-3D Liver Hollow Fiber Model for Both Drug Efficacy and Hepatotoxicity in Babies , 2016, EBioMedicine.

[12]  R. Chaisson,et al.  Shortening Tuberculosis Treatment With Fluoroquinolones: Lost in Translation? , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[13]  L. Myer,et al.  Tuberculous Pericarditis is Multibacillary and Bacterial Burden Drives High Mortality , 2015, EBioMedicine.

[14]  K. Romero,et al.  Forecasting Accuracy of the Hollow Fiber Model of Tuberculosis for Clinical Therapeutic Outcomes. , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  K. Romero,et al.  Correlations Between the Hollow Fiber Model of Tuberculosis and Therapeutic Events in Tuberculosis Patients: Learn and Confirm. , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[16]  K. Romero,et al.  Nonclinical models for antituberculosis drug development: a landscape analysis. , 2015, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  T. Gumbo,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and dose-response relationships of antituberculosis drugs: recommendations and standards for industry and academia. , 2015, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[18]  P. Clevenbergh,et al.  Shorter moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  R. Aarnoutse,et al.  Shorter moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  A. Crook,et al.  Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  B. D. de Jong,et al.  A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  P. V. van Helden,et al.  Impact of Nonlinear Interactions of Pharmacokinetics and MICs on Sputum Bacillary Kill Rates as a Marker of Sterilizing Effect in Tuberculosis , 2014, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[23]  H. McIlleron,et al.  Redefining Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Based on Clinical Response to Combination Therapy , 2014, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[24]  P. V. van Helden,et al.  The pyrazinamide susceptibility breakpoint above which combination therapy fails , 2014, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[25]  H. McIlleron,et al.  Serum drug concentrations predictive of pulmonary tuberculosis outcomes. , 2013, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[26]  T. Gumbo Biological variability and the emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[27]  John Horton,et al.  Evaluation of Initial and Steady-State Gatifloxacin Pharmacokinetics and Dose in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients by Using Monte Carlo Simulations , 2013, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[28]  J. Pasipanodya,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Self-Administered vs Directly Observed Therapy Effect on Microbiologic Failure, Relapse, and Acquired Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis Patients , 2013, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[29]  J. Pasipanodya,et al.  Meta-analysis of clinical studies supports the pharmacokinetic variability hypothesis for acquired drug resistance and failure of antituberculosis therapy. , 2012, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[30]  Akash Khandelwal,et al.  A Semimechanistic Pharmacokinetic-Enzyme Turnover Model for Rifampin Autoinduction in Adult Tuberculosis Patients , 2012, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[31]  J. Pasipanodya,et al.  Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis not due to noncompliance but to between-patient pharmacokinetic variability. , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[32]  S. Srivastava,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mismatch Does Not Lead to Emergence of Isoniazid- or Rifampin-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis but to Better Antimicrobial Effect: a New Paradigm for Antituberculosis Drug Scheduling , 2011, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[33]  G. Drusano,et al.  The Combination of Rifampin plus Moxifloxacin Is Synergistic for Suppression of Resistance but Antagonistic for Cell Kill of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as Determined in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model , 2010, mBio.

[34]  J. Pasipanodya,et al.  Meningeal Tuberculosis: High Long-Term Mortality Despite Standard Therapy , 2010, Medicine.

[35]  J. Grosset,et al.  Paradoxical Effect of Isoniazid on the Activity of Rifampin-Pyrazinamide Combination in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis , 2009, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[36]  D. Mitchison,et al.  A Phase II study of the sterilising activities of ofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. , 2008, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[37]  H. McIlleron,et al.  Elevated gatifloxacin and reduced rifampicin concentrations in a single-dose interaction study amongst healthy volunteers. , 2007, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[38]  H. McIlleron,et al.  Determinants of Rifampin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, and Ethambutol Pharmacokinetics in a Cohort of Tuberculosis Patients , 2006, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[39]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[40]  Max Salfinger,et al.  Selection of a moxifloxacin dose that suppresses drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, by use of an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model and mathematical modeling. , 2004, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[41]  R. Chaisson,et al.  Bactericidal Activity of Increasing Daily and Weekly Doses of Moxifloxacin in Murine Tuberculosis , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[42]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[43]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[44]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .

[45]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Prediction Games and Arcing Algorithms , 1999, Neural Computation.

[46]  L. Breiman Arcing the edge , 1997 .