Status of Preconceptual Design of the Advanced High-Temperature Reactor (AHTR)

A new reactor plant concept is presented that combines the benefits of ceramic-coated, high-temperature particle fuel with those of clean, high-temperature, low-pressure molten salt coolant. The Advanced High-Temperature Reactor (AHTR) concept is a collaboration of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, and the University of California at Berkeley. The purpose of the concept is to provide an advanced design capable of satisfying the top-level functional requirements of the U.S. Department of Energy Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP), while also providing a technology base that is sufficiently robust to allow future development paths to higher temperatures and larger outputs with highly competitive economics. This report summarizes the status of the AHTR preconceptual design. It captures the results from an intense effort over a period of 3 months to (1) screen and examine potential feasibility concerns with the concept; (2) refine the conceptual design of major systems; and (3) identify research, development, and technology requirements to fully mature the AHTR design. Several analyses were performed and are presented to quantify the AHTR performance expectations and to assist in the selection of several design parameters. The AHTR, like other NGNP reactor concepts, uses coated particle fuel in a graphite matrix. But unlike the other NGNP concepts, the AHTR uses molten salt rather than helium as the primary system coolant. The considerable previous experience with molten salts in nuclear environments is discussed, and the status of high-temperature materials is reviewed. The large thermal inertia of the system, the excellent heat transfer and fission product retention characteristics of molten salt, and the low-pressure operation of the primary system provide significant safety attributes for the AHTR. Compared with helium coolant, a molten salt cooled reactor will have significantly lower fuel temperatures (150-200-C lower) for the equivalent temperature of heat delivered to either the power conversion system or a hydrogen production plant. Using a comparative cost analysis, the construction costs per unit output are projected to be 50-55% of the costs for modular gas-cooled or sodium-cooled reactor systems. This is primarily a consequence of substantially larger power output and higher conversion efficiency for the AHTR. The AHTR has a number of unique technical challenges in meeting the NGNP requirements; however, it appears to offer advantages over high-temperature helium-cooled reactors and provides an alternative development path to achieve the NGNP requirements. Primary challenges include optimizing the core design for improved response to transients, designing an internal blanket to thermally protect the reactor vessel, and engineering solutions to high-temperature refueling and maintenance.

[1]  Theodore M. Besmann,et al.  Carbon/Carbon Composite Bipolar Plate for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells , 2000 .

[2]  Per F. Peterson,et al.  Advanced CSiC Composites for High-temperature Nuclear Heat Transport with Helium, Molten Salts, and Sulphur-iodine Thermochemical Hydrogen Process Fluids , 2004 .

[3]  R. C. Robertson,et al.  CONCEPTUAL DESIGN STUDY OF A SINGLE-FLUID MOLTEN-SALT BREEDER REACTOR. , 1971 .

[4]  Charles W. Forsberg,et al.  Hydrogen, nuclear energy, and the advanced high-temperature reactor , 2003 .

[5]  Per F. Peterson,et al.  Multiple-Reheat Brayton Cycles for Nuclear Power Conversion with Molten Coolants , 2003 .

[6]  Malcolm P. LaBar The Gas Turbine – Modular Helium Reactor: A Promising Option for Near Term Deployment , 2002 .

[7]  W. R. Grimes Molten-Salt Reactor Chemistry , 1970 .

[8]  J. Shaffer,et al.  PREPARATION AND HANDLING OF SALT MIXTURES FOR THE MOLTEN SALT REACTOR EXPERIMENT. , 1971 .

[9]  Akihiko Shimizu,et al.  Design and development of the Flibe blanket for helical-type fusion reactor FFHR , 2000 .

[10]  Karl Verfondern,et al.  Source Term Estimation for Small-Sized HTRs: Status and Further Needs, Extracted from German Safety Analyses , 2001 .

[11]  R. L. Klueh,et al.  Materials considerations for molten salt accelerator-based plutonium conversion systems , 1995 .

[12]  P. Peterson,et al.  Molten-Salt-Cooled Advanced High-Temperature Reactor for Production of Hydrogen and Electricity , 2003 .

[13]  W. R. Grimes,et al.  Fission product behavior in the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment , 1975 .

[14]  J. Ogden,et al.  A Study of Options for the Deployment of Large Fusion Power Plants , 2001 .

[15]  Deborah Hairston,et al.  The utility of hydrogen , 2001 .

[16]  R. B. Briggs,et al.  Molten-Salt Reactor Program Semiannual Progress Report for Period Ending July 31, 1964 , 1964 .

[17]  K. R. Schultz,et al.  Initial Screening of Thermochemical Water-Splitting Cycles for High Efficiency Generation of Hydrogen Fuels Using Nuclear Power , 1999 .

[18]  S. Cantor,et al.  PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF MOLTEN-SALT REACTOR FUEL, COOLANT, AND FLUSH SALTS. , 1968 .

[19]  C. W. Forsberg,et al.  HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AS A MAJOR NUCLEAR ENERGY APPLICATION , 2001 .

[20]  M. El-Wakil,et al.  Nuclear Energy Conversion , 1971 .

[21]  L. M. Toth,et al.  Fluorine generation by gamma radiolysis of a fluoride salt mixture , 1990 .

[22]  Michael Deyerler,et al.  Short carbon fiber reinforced ceramic - Cesic - for optical-mechanical applications , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[23]  Redox Potential of Novel Electrochemical Buffers Useful for Corrosion Prevention in Molten Fluorides , 2002 .

[24]  R. Hino,et al.  38. R&D on hydrogen production by high-temperature electrolysis of steam , 2004 .

[25]  Edward J. Parma,et al.  Very High Efficiency Reactor (VHER) Concepts for Electrical Power Generation and Hydrogen Production , 2003 .

[26]  L. E. McNeese,et al.  Molten-salt reactor program. Semiannual progress report for period ending August 31, 1974 , 1975 .

[27]  J. Baker,et al.  HIGH INTENSITY GAMMA IRRADIATION OF MOLTEN SODIUM FLUOROBORATE--SODIUM FLUORIDE EUTECTIC SALT. , 1970 .