Fluid Grouping: Quantifying Group Engagement around Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in the Wild

Interactive surfaces are increasingly common in museums and other informal learning environments where they are seen as a medium for promoting social engagement. However, despite their increasing prevalence, we know very little about factors that contribute to collaboration and learning around interactive surfaces. In this paper we present analyses of visitor engagement around several multi-touch tabletop science exhibits. Observations of 629 visitors were collected through two widely used techniques: video study and shadowing. We make four contributions: 1) we present an algorithm for identifying groups within a dynamic flow of visitors through an exhibit hall; 2) we present measures of group-level engagement along with methods for statistically analyzing these measures; 3) we assess the effect of observational techniques on visitors' engagement, demonstrating that consented video studies do not necessarily reflect visitor behavior in more naturalistic circumstances; and 4) we present an analysis showing that groups of two, groups with both children and adults, and groups that take turns spend longer at the exhibits and engage more with scientific concepts.

[1]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Learning As Conversational Elaboration : A Proposal to Capture , Code , and Analyze Talk in Museums , 2000 .

[2]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware , 2004, CSCW.

[3]  Jeff Shrager,et al.  Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent‐child activity , 2001 .

[5]  Sherman Rosenfeld A Naturalistic Study of Visitors at an Interactive Mini‐Zoo , 1982 .

[6]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[7]  Orit Shaer,et al.  Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction , 2011, CHI.

[8]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  How pairs interact over a multimodal digital table , 2007, CHI.

[9]  Francesco Setti,et al.  F-Formation Detection: Individuating Free-Standing Conversational Groups in Images , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Ann Morrison,et al.  Worlds of information: designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display , 2010, CHI.

[11]  Judy Diamond,et al.  California Academy of Sciences Discovery Room , 1988 .

[12]  Chris Quintana,et al.  Synergistic scaffolding of technologically-enhanced STEM learning in informal institutions , 2014 .

[13]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  Living Liquid: Design and Evaluation of an Exploratory Visualization Tool for Museum Visitors , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface , 2011, CHI.

[15]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments , 2011, CSCW.

[16]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Futura: design for collaborative learning and game play on a multi-touch digital tabletop , 2010, TEI.

[17]  Judy Diamond,et al.  The Behavior of Family Groups in Science Museums , 1986 .

[18]  Paulette M. McManus It's the company you keep …: The social determination of learning‐related behaviour in a science museum , 1987 .

[19]  Minda Borun,et al.  Enhancing Family Learning through Exhibits. , 1997 .

[20]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  The DeepTree Exhibit: Visualizing the Tree of Life to Facilitate Informal Learning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[21]  J. Falk,et al.  Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning , 2000 .

[22]  Cynthia Abbott Cone,et al.  Space, Time, and Family Interaction: Visitor Behavior at the Science Museum of Minnesota , 1978 .

[23]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Of BATs and APEs: an interactive tabletop game for natural history museums , 2012, CHI.

[24]  K. Crowley,et al.  Learning conversations in museums , 2002 .

[25]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Beyond one-size-fits-all: how interactive tabletops support collaborative learning , 2011, IDC.

[26]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  G. W. Mullins,et al.  Children's Gender Behavior at Science Museum Exhibits , 1992 .

[28]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  It's just a toolbar!: using tangibles to help children manage conflict around a multi-touch tabletop , 2010, TEI.

[29]  John J. Koran,et al.  The Relationship of Age, Sex, Attention, and Holding Power with Two Types of Science Exhibits , 1986 .

[30]  Joshua P. Gutwill,et al.  Fostering Active Prolonged Engagement : The Art of Creating APE Exhibits , 2017 .

[31]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits , 2011, CHI.

[32]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  FlowBlocks: a multi-touch ui for crowd interaction , 2012, UIST.

[33]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre , 2008, CHI.

[34]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays , 2006, CHI.

[35]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table , 2009, ITS '09.