Effect of Gaussian Correlated Channel on Uplink Channel Estimation for Massive MIMO with Nested Array at the Base Station

mmWave massive MIMO can support high data rate on account of enhanced spectral efficiency. Uplink channel estimation is an important intermediate problem. Usually channels between the base station and the user equipment is assumed IID, Rayleigh and flat fading. However, the antennas are closely packed together in a massive MIMO and local scatterers are present around the user equipment. This means that a correlated channel model is more realistic. In this paper, a Gaussian one ring scattering model for the channel is used. The uplink Linear Minimum Mean Square Error (LMMSE) channel estimator performance is analyzed, with a pilot reuse factor of L > 1. The upper limit of the estimation performance for varying degrees of correlation and pilot length is derived and verified by numerical experiments. In place of usual dense uniform linear array, a sparse nested array is employed at the base station. It is verified experimentally that the sparse array performs better when the channels are highly correlated. However, both arrays showed similar performance for the usual IID case when the correlation is small ((σφ>> 0.5).

[1]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Massive MIMO Networks: Spectral, Energy, and Hardware Efficiency , 2018, Found. Trends Signal Process..

[2]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Pilot contamination is not a fundamental asymptotic limitation in massive MIMO , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[4]  Md. Atiqur Rahman Ahad,et al.  Effect of exponential correlation model on channel estimation for massive MIMO , 2016, 2016 19th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT).

[5]  Wei-Ping Zhu,et al.  Joint Doppler and Channel Estimation with Nested Arrays for Millimeter Wave Communications , 2018, 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[6]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Performance of Conjugate and Zero-Forcing Beamforming in Large-Scale Antenna Systems , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Nested Arrays: A Novel Approach to Array Processing With Enhanced Degrees of Freedom , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Optimal Multiuser Transmit Beamforming: A Difficult Problem with a Simple Solution Structure [Lecture Notes] , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Massive MIMO: An Introduction , 2015, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[10]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[11]  Shahid Mumtaz,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Communication for Future Wireless Systems: A Survey , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 2002 .

[13]  More than 50 billion connected devices , 2011 .