Possible transport energy sources for the future

In the medium to long term, low fossil fuel availability will make it necessary to find alternatives. Mass production of biofuels will not be a practical solution because it requires strong competition for land that is used for growing food. Therefore, it will be necessary to revise the frame of transportation energy sources. The number of pure light- and heavy-duty electric vehicles could increase in urban areas. Instead, it will be hard to find a viable alternative to the internal combustion engine for extra-urban transport vehicles, therefore alternative synthetic fuels could be used to compensate for fossil fuel depletion. Aside from a small share obtainable from biomass, most synthetic fuels are expected to be obtained from coal. Among these, synthetic natural gas represents a very good solution. In fact, synthetic natural gas will be advantageous with respect to hydrogen, whose on-board storage will be an unsolved problem in the medium term, and with respect to synthetic liquid fuels, which require more energy in the production phase. Moreover, the carbon content of liquid fuels, which is higher than that of gaseous fuels, will be responsible for higher CO2 emissions from vehicles. Currently, natural gas has poor diffusion in the transport sector, and this paper highlights the motivations for favouring a policy aimed at increasing the share of gaseous fuel-powered vehicles. In addition to the low environmental impact, synthetic natural gas also offers the possibility of optimising the utilisation of future resources.

[1]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass , 2009 .

[2]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Biofuels and biochemicals production from forest biomass in Western Canada , 2011 .

[3]  Diana D. Brehob,et al.  Analysis of Knock in a Dual-Fuel Engine , 1992 .

[4]  C. Johnson Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Municipal Fleets , 2010 .

[5]  G. Karim,et al.  Exhaust Emissions from Dual Fuel Engines at Light Load , 1993 .

[6]  José Roberto Moreira,et al.  Global Biomass Energy Potential , 2006 .

[7]  A. Faaij,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis , 2009 .

[8]  Wennan Zhang,et al.  Automotive fuels from biomass via gasification , 2010 .

[9]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Petrochemicals from oil, natural gas, coal and biomass: Production costs in 2030–2050 , 2009 .

[10]  Guangjian Liu,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch fuels from coal and biomass: Strategic advantages of once-through (“polygeneration”) configurations , 2009 .

[11]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency , 2007 .

[12]  R.W.R. Zwart,et al.  High Efficiency Co-production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) and Fischer−Tropsch (FT) Transportation Fuels from Biomass , 2005 .

[13]  H. Boerrigter,et al.  MILENA gasification technology for high efficient SNG production from biomass , 2005 .

[14]  R.W.R. Zwart,et al.  "GREEN GAS" AS SNG (SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS) A RENEWABLE FUEL WITH CONVENTIONAL QUALITY , 2006 .

[15]  M. Gambino,et al.  Evaluation of emission toxicity of urban bus engines: compressed natural gas and comparison with liquid fuels. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Andreas Brekke,et al.  Environmental impacts and costs of woody Biomass-to-Liquid (BTL) production and use — A review , 2011 .

[17]  Pravat K. Swain,et al.  Biomass to liquid: A prospective challenge to research and development in 21st century , 2011 .

[18]  Hari C. Mantripragada,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants with carbon capture and sequestration , 2011 .