Comparing Graphical and Tangible User Interfaces for a Tower Defense Game

This paper presents the design and test results of a tabletop Tangible User Interface (TUI) for a real-time strategy game. An experiment was conducted comparing the TUI and Graphical User Interface (GUI) versions of the same tower defense game application. The results show that users performed better with the GUI and found it easier to use, but reported more interest and enjoyment with the TUI. Overall, however, preference was split evenly between the two interface types. Analysis of qualitative user feedback provided further insight into these results, and based on this, suggestions are made for future research in the area of Tangible User Interfaces.

[1]  Orit Shaer,et al.  A specification paradigm for the design and implementation of tangible user interfaces , 2009, TCHI.

[2]  Kenneth P. Fishkin,et al.  A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: beyond pixels , 2008, TEI.

[4]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[5]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces , 2008, TEI.

[6]  Ross Bencina,et al.  reacTIVision: a computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction , 2007, TEI.

[7]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction , 2006, CHI.

[8]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[9]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  Janice Lander.  Within-Subject Designs , 1998 .

[11]  Orit Shaer,et al.  Reality-based interaction: unifying the new generation of interaction styles , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Gwm Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  New directions in User-System Interaction: augmented reality, ubiquitous and mobile computing , 1999 .

[13]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[15]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  How to show that 9 > 221 : Collect judgments in a between-subjects design , 1999 .

[16]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[17]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .