Quantitative Characterization of Tissue Using Ultrasound

Present medical ultrasound systems are based on energy detection methods and therefore only utilize echo intensity information. However, phase, as well as spectral, information is recorded by the transducer, which is a pressure sensitive device, but is not utilized in present display or measurement schemes. This additional information may be of diagnostic significance since the interaction between sound and tissue is exceedingly complex, since many types of tissue can be categorized in terms of their acoustical properties, and since changes in tissue acoustical properties can be correlated with specific pathological states. Thus, in principle, in vivo techniques could be devised which would extract and separate the medically significant features of the ultrasound interactions with tissue and would display ultrasonic tissue signatures appropriate for a differential diagnosis. The development of such quantitative techniques for the measurement of ultrasonic tissue parameters and/or the display of ultrasonic tissue signatures is known as ultrasonic tissue characterization. In this paper we review the physical and clinical basis for ultrasonic tissue characterization, describe several characterization schemes currently being explored, and attempt to assess the importance such techniques may play in the future of diagnostic medicine.

[1]  R. Mountford,et al.  Ultrasonic liver scanning: the A-scan in the normal and cirrhosis. , 1972, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  R C Chivers,et al.  The scattering of ultrasound by human tissues--some theoretical models. , 1977, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  D. J. Fritch,et al.  MEASUREMENTS OF ARTICULAR TISSUES WITH ULTRASOUND , 1958, American journal of physical medicine.

[4]  L. J. Busse,et al.  Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization: Correlation Between Biochemical and Ultrasonic Indices of Myocardial Injury , 1976 .

[5]  F. Fry,et al.  Transkull transmission of an intense focused ultrasonic beam. , 1977, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  K. Erikson,et al.  Ultrasound in Medicine-A Review , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[7]  O. Takatani,et al.  Differential diagnosis of breast tumors. The sensitivity graded method of ultrasonotomography and clinical evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy , 1974 .

[8]  F. L. Lizzi,et al.  Power Spectra Measurements of Ultrasonic Backscatter from Ocular Tissues , 1975 .

[9]  J. Ferrucci Body ultrasonography (first of two parts). , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Ferrucci Body ultrasonography (second of two parts). , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Mountford,et al.  Ultrasonic liver scanning: the quantitative analysis of the normal A-scan. , 1972, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J. Reid,et al.  Further pilot echographic studies on the histologic structure of tumors of the living intact human breast. , 1952, The American journal of pathology.

[13]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Measurement of spatial distribution of refractive index in tissues by ultrasonic computer assisted tomography. , 1978, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  William D. O'Brien,et al.  The Role of Collagen in Determining Ultrasonic Propagation Properties in Tissue , 1977 .

[15]  O. Takatani,et al.  Differential diagnosis of breast tumors. The sensitivity graded method ultrasonotomography and clinical evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy. , 1974, Cancer.

[16]  K. Taylor,et al.  Scanning techniques in grey-scale ultrasonography. , 1975, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  K F Etzold,et al.  Differences in the attenuation of ultrasound by normal, benign, and malignant breast tissue , 1976, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[18]  F. Dunn,et al.  Letter: Correlation of echographic visualizability of tissue with biological composition and physiological state. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.