Contribution of Connectivity Assessments to Green Infrastructure (GI)

A major goal of green infrastructure (GI) is to provide functional networks of habitats and ecosystems to maintain biodiversity long-term, while at the same time optimizing landscape and ecosystem functions and services to meet human needs. Traditionally, connectivity studies are informed by movement ecology with species-specific attributes of the type and timing of movement (e.g., dispersal, foraging, mating) and movement distances, while spatial environmental data help delineate movement pathways across landscapes. To date, a range of methods and approaches are available that (a) are relevant across any organism and movement type independent of time and space scales, (b) are ready-to-use as standalone freeware or custom GIS implementation, and (c) produce appealing visual outputs that facilitate communication with land managers. However, to enhance the robustness of connectivity assessments and ensure that current trends in connectivity modeling contribute to GI with their full potential, common denominators on which to ground planning and design strategies are required. Likewise, comparable, repeatable connectivity assessments will be needed to put results of these scientific tools into practice for multi-functional GI plans and implementation. In this paper, we discuss use and limitations of state-of-the-art connectivity methods in contributing to GI implementation.

[1]  L. Tischendorf Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda , 2016 .

[3]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Using individual-based movement models to assess inter-patch connectivity for large carnivores in fragmented landscapes , 2013 .

[4]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Linking movement behavior and fine-scale genetic structure to model landscape connectivity for bobcats (Lynx rufus) , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[5]  Maarten J van Strien,et al.  A new analytical approach to landscape genetic modelling: least‐cost transect analysis and linear mixed models , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[6]  Philip Leitner,et al.  Multiscale connectivity and graph theory highlight critical areas for conservation under climate change. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  Sara Meerow,et al.  Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit , 2017 .

[8]  N. Charney Evaluating expert opinion and spatial scale in an amphibian model , 2012 .

[9]  Rob Slotow,et al.  Structural habitat predicts functional dispersal habitat of a large carnivore: how leopards change spots. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  Allan Hollander,et al.  Managing biodiversity under climate change: challenges, frameworks, and tools for adaptation , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[11]  J. Row,et al.  Habitat distribution influences dispersal and fine‐scale genetic population structure of eastern foxsnakes (Mintonius gloydi) across a fragmented landscape , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[12]  Jeff Bowman,et al.  Multi-species genetic connectivity in a terrestrial habitat network , 2017, Movement ecology.

[13]  Cecil C. Konijnendijk,et al.  Green Infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions , 2013 .

[14]  Edward C. Lefroy,et al.  Characterising landscape connectivity for conservation planning using a dispersal guild approach , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  Leo Polansky,et al.  Elucidating the significance of spatial memory on movement decisions by African savannah elephants using state–space models , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Movement behavior explains genetic differentiation in American black bears , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Assessing landscape connectivity for large mammals in the Caucasus using Landsat 8 seasonal image composites , 2017 .

[18]  P. Verburg,et al.  Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation : How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? , 2017 .

[19]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least‐cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? , 2011 .

[20]  Janine Bolliger,et al.  Increasing Pond Density to Maintain a Patchy Habitat Network of the European Treefrog (Hyla arborea) , 2015 .

[21]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study , 2015 .

[22]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Assessing species vulnerability to climate and land use change : the case of the Swiss breeding birds MAGGINI , 2018 .

[24]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[25]  C. Jackson,et al.  Evaluating habitat connectivity methodologies: a case study with endangered African wild dogs in South Africa , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  N. Mittal,et al.  Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  J. Zalapa,et al.  Woodland and floral richness boost bumble bee density in cranberry resource pulse landscapes , 2019, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  Nicholas A. Miller,et al.  Habitat availability for multiple avian species under modeled alternative conservation scenarios in the Two Hearted River watershed in Michigan, USA , 2014 .

[29]  Fei Wang,et al.  A socio-ecological perspective of urban green networks: the Stockholm case , 2017, Urban Ecosystems.

[30]  H. Leirs,et al.  Genetic distinction between contiguous urban and rural multimammate mice in Tanzania despite gene flow , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[31]  Sean A. Parks,et al.  Combining resource selection and movement behavior to predict corridors for Canada lynx at their southern range periphery , 2013 .

[32]  David O. Wallin,et al.  Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  Naiara Pinto,et al.  Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  W. S. Brown,et al.  Integrating individual behaviour and landscape genetics: the population structure of timber rattlesnake hibernacula , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[35]  Ryan M. Perkl,et al.  Geodesigning landscape linkages: Coupling GIS with wildlife corridor design in conservation planning , 2016 .

[36]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[37]  P. Sunnucks,et al.  Disrupted fine-scale population processes in fragmented landscapes despite large-scale genetic connectivity for a widespread and common cooperative breeder: the superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[38]  M. Forister,et al.  Identification of source‐sink dynamics in mountain lions of the Great Basin , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[39]  Ellen Banzhaf,et al.  Towards a better understanding of Green Infrastructure: A critical review , 2018 .

[40]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Evaluating multispecies landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal community , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  Ron Corstanje,et al.  Ecological connectivity networks in rapidly expanding cities , 2017, Heliyon.

[42]  B. Šljukić,et al.  The concept of green infrastructure and urban landscape planning: a challenge for urban forestry planning in Belgrade, Serbia , 2018, iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry.

[43]  Gabriela Maksymiuk,et al.  Can we face the challenge: how to implement a theoretical concept of green infrastructure into planning practice? Warsaw case study , 2017, Green Infrastructure.

[44]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to dispersal , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  Janine Bolliger,et al.  How to make landscape genetics beneficial for conservation management? , 2014, Conservation Genetics.

[46]  V. Ezenwa,et al.  Drivers and consequences of variation in individual social connectivity , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  Janine Bolliger,et al.  Combining landscape genetics, radio-tracking and long-term monitoring to derive management implications for Natterjack toads (Epidalea calamita) in agricultural landscapes , 2016 .

[48]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Urban growth and landscape connectivity threats assessment at Saguaro National Park, Arizona, USA , 2018 .

[49]  Marco Saerens,et al.  Predicting the continuum between corridors and barriers to animal movements using Step Selection Functions and Randomized Shortest Paths. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[50]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Ecological resistance surfaces predict fine‐scale genetic differentiation in a terrestrial woodland salamander , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[51]  Janine Bolliger,et al.  Landscape genetics since 2003: status, challenges and future directions , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[52]  P. Sunnucks,et al.  Does reduced mobility through fragmented landscapes explain patch extinction patterns for three honeyeaters? , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[53]  E. Randi,et al.  Expert-based versus habitat-suitability models to develop resistance surfaces in landscape genetics , 2016, Oecologia.

[54]  E. Randi,et al.  Ecological connectivity assessment in a strongly structured fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) population , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[55]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels , 2010, Ecology letters.

[56]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[57]  John A. Litvaitis,et al.  Modeling landscape connectivity for bobcats using expert‐opinion and empirically derived models: how well do they work? , 2017 .

[58]  S. Manel,et al.  Role of habitat heterogeneity and landscape connectivity in shaping gene flow and spatial population structure of a dominant rodent species in a tropical dry forest , 2016 .

[59]  S. Cushman,et al.  Tiger abundance and gene flow in Central India are driven by disparate combinations of topography and land cover , 2017 .

[60]  Ron Corstanje,et al.  A bird’s eye view: using circuit theory to study urban landscape connectivity for birds , 2017, Landscape Ecology.

[61]  Ines Hrdalo,et al.  Implementation of Green Infrastructure Principles in Dubrovnik, Croatia to Minimize Climate Change Problems , 2015 .

[62]  Erin L. Landguth,et al.  UNICOR: a species connectivity and corridor network simulator , 2012 .

[63]  F. Canters,et al.  Analysing urban green space accessibility and quality: A GIS-based model as spatial decision support for urban ecosystem services in Brussels , 2017 .

[64]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  K. Bell,et al.  Conservation versus cluster subdivisions and implications for habitat connectivity , 2011 .

[66]  A. Irwin The dark side of light: how artificial lighting is harming the natural world , 2018, Nature.

[67]  Robert C. Fleischer,et al.  Prioritizing Tiger Conservation through Landscape Genetics and Habitat Linkages , 2014, PloS one.

[68]  Zhenzhen Zhang,et al.  Enhancing landscape connectivity through multifunctional green infrastructure corridor modeling and design , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[69]  S. Cushman,et al.  Ecological differences and limiting factors in different regional contexts: landscape genetics of the stone marten in the Iberian Peninsula , 2017, Landscape Ecology.

[70]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Spatio-Temporal Process of Township Urbanization: A Large-Scale Data-Driven Approach , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[71]  Christopher T. Rota,et al.  Insights from Ecological Theory on Temporal Dynamics and Species Distribution Modeling , 2011 .

[72]  A. Davidson,et al.  Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[73]  A. Hansen,et al.  Connecting models to movements: testing connectivity model predictions against empirical migration and dispersal data , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[74]  N Perrin,et al.  Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go? , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[75]  Martina L. Hobi,et al.  Countrywide Stereo-Image Matching for Updating Digital Surface Models in the Framework of the Swiss National Forest Inventory , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[76]  Amanda E. Martin,et al.  Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[77]  Peter H. Singleton,et al.  Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[78]  S. Dong,et al.  Using cross-scale landscape connectivity indices to identify key habitat resource patches for Asian elephants in Xishuangbanna, China , 2018 .

[79]  J. Bolliger,et al.  Landscape genetics as a tool for conservation planning: predicting the effects of landscape change on gene flow. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[80]  Alexandra Pavlova,et al.  Aquatic communities in arid landscapes: local conditions, dispersal traits and landscape configuration determine local biodiversity , 2015 .

[81]  Christophe Claramunt,et al.  On Integrating Size and Shape Distributions into a Spatio-Temporal Information Entropy Framework , 2019, Entropy.

[82]  G. Henebry,et al.  Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: Review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions , 2009 .

[83]  E. L. Koen,et al.  The effect of cost surface parameterization on landscape resistance estimates , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.

[84]  Riccardo Privitera,et al.  Reducing Seismic Vulnerability and Energy Demand of Cities through Green Infrastructure , 2018, Sustainability.

[85]  M. Obrist,et al.  Assessing habitat connectivity for ground-dwelling animals in an urban environment. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[86]  Janine Bolliger,et al.  When landscape variables do not explain migration rates: An example from an endangered dragonfly, Leucorrhinia caudalis (Odonata: Libellulidae) , 2011 .

[87]  Erin L. Koen,et al.  Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps , 2014 .

[88]  Curtis M. Bradley,et al.  A multi-method approach to delineate and validate migratory corridors , 2017, Landscape Ecology.

[89]  Alex M. Lechner,et al.  A framework for incorporating fine-scale dispersal behaviour into biodiversity conservation planning , 2015 .

[90]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[91]  F. Gugerli,et al.  No distinct barrier effects of highways and a wide river on the genetic structure of the Alpine newt (Ichthyosaura alpestris) in densely settled landscapes , 2018, Conservation Genetics.

[92]  S. Cushman,et al.  Landscape-level analysis of mountain goat population connectivity in Washington and southern British Columbia , 2015, Conservation Genetics.

[93]  Jane Elith,et al.  Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services , 2015, Environmental Management.

[94]  L. Hannah,et al.  Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve‐selection methods , 2004 .

[95]  M. A. Donnelly,et al.  Evaluating connectivity for tropical amphibians using empirically derived resistance surfaces. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[96]  E. Revilla,et al.  Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[97]  A. J. Lynch,et al.  Is It Good to Be Green? Assessing the Ecological Results of County Green Infrastructure Planning , 2016 .

[98]  Virgilio Hermoso,et al.  Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[99]  S. Otto Adaptation, speciation and extinction in the Anthropocene , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[100]  Brett G. Dickson,et al.  Single-Species and Multiple-Species Connectivity Models for Large Mammals on the Navajo Nation , 2017, Western North American Naturalist.

[101]  J. Bolliger,et al.  Changes in demand and supply of ecosystem services under scenarios of future land use in Vorarlberg, Austria , 2019, Journal of Mountain Science.

[102]  Fabio Terribile,et al.  A geospatial decision support system to assist olive growing at the landscape scale , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[103]  W. Steffen,et al.  The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration , 2015 .

[104]  Megan K. Jennings,et al.  Are all data types and connectivity models created equal? Validating common connectivity approaches with dispersal data , 2018 .

[105]  L. Fahrig Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se , 2017 .

[106]  N. Roche,et al.  Effects of greenway development on functional connectivity for bats , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[107]  Diogo F. Ferreira,et al.  Predicting biodiversity loss in island and countryside ecosystems through the lens of taxonomic and functional biogeography , 2019, Ecography.

[108]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Balancing Forest‐Regeneration Probabilities and Maintenance Costs in Dry Grasslands of High Conservation Priority , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[109]  H. Wehrden,et al.  Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas , 2016 .

[110]  Víctor M. Rodríguez-Espinosa,et al.  Green infrastructure design using GIS and spatial analysis: a proposal for the Henares Corridor (Madrid-Guadalajara, Spain) , 2020, Landscape Research.

[111]  Alex M. Lechner,et al.  From static connectivity modelling to scenario-based planning at local and regional scales , 2015 .

[112]  K. Rusche,et al.  Green infrastructure under pressure. A global narrative between regional vision and local implementation , 2019, European Planning Studies.

[113]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? , 2018, Biological Conservation.

[114]  Erin L. Koen,et al.  Mapping landscape connectivity for large spatial extents , 2019, Landscape Ecology.

[115]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[116]  R. Verburg,et al.  A framework to estimate biodiversity loss and associated costs due to nitrogen emissions from single power plants , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[117]  J. Fattebert,et al.  Landscape effects on wild boar home range size under contrasting harvest regimes in a human-dominated agro-ecosystem , 2017, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[118]  R. Kays,et al.  Animal behavior, cost-based corridor models, and real corridors , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[119]  J. Koprowski,et al.  Circuit theory to estimate natal dispersal routes and functional landscape connectivity for an endangered small mammal , 2017, Landscape Ecology.

[120]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[121]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[122]  Andrew Fall,et al.  The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[123]  F. Gugerli,et al.  Evaluating the functionality of expert-assessed wildlife corridors with genetic data from roe deer , 2016 .

[124]  Alan Peters,et al.  Spatio-temporal patterns in green infrastructure as driver of land surface temperature variability: The case of Sydney , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[125]  Greg Stuart-Hill,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of local- and regional-scale wildlife corridors using quantitative metrics of functional connectivity , 2018 .

[126]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Making It Spatial Makes It Personal: Engaging Stakeholders with Geospatial Participatory Modeling , 2019, Land.

[127]  Paul B. Leonard,et al.  Landscape connectivity losses due to sea level rise and land use change , 2017 .